Hello and welcome to my list of the best freeride snowboard boots for the 2020/21 season. This list covers what I consider to be the best 5 men’s freeride boot choices.
Each pair of boots in this list has been rated on a number of factors that are important for boots that will serve the freerider/big mountain rider and, as always here at SnowboardingProfiles.com, given a total score out of 100.
Some Quick Stats Before We Start the List
Of 14 boots that I rated:
O.k. let’s get into the top 5!
FREERIDE BOOT #5
Boot: Ride Insano
- CANADA
- UK/EUROPE
Lacing System: Double Boa
Flex: Stiff (10 out of 10)
Rating: 90.5/100
The Insanos are the equal cheapest boots on this list but this by no means compromises their performance (and by no means, means they're cheap either - just in comparison to the average boot price for this category).
What can I say, these boots perform well in every factor that I assessed them on. Just awesome across the board – super responsive, great heel hold, comfortable, good shock absorption and plenty of traction for hiking.
And these are the stiffest boots I've ridden - so if you like em stiff, these are right up there, without going into hard boots.
Learn more about the Insanos in the Video Below
Score Breakdown for the Insano
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 5.0 | 35/35 |
TRACTION | 4.0 | 12/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 4.5 | 9/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.5 | 9/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 3.5 | 7/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 3.0 | 6/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 90.5/100 |
FREERIDE BOOT #4
Boot: Vans Verse
- CANADA
- UK/EUROPE
Lacing System: Double Boa
Flex: Stiff (9 out of 10)
Rating: 91.1/100
The Vans Verse are a rugged, responsive boot, built for hard charging and big mountain missions.
Featuring TNF Flashdry™ to wick away moisture from your feet and a waterproof zipper cover, the Verse will help to keep your feet warm and dry no matter what the conditions.
The other great feature of these boots is that they use Vans' removable tongue stiffeners, which means, if you want, you can remove those for a softer flexing boot. So on those days where you want a bit more forgiveness - at the end of the day or for more casual riding with mates in the resort, then the Verse have you covered without needing another pair of boots.
Learn more about the Verse in the Video Below
Score Breakdown for the Verse
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 5.0 | 35/35 |
TRACTION | 3.5 | 10.5/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 4.5 | 9/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.0 | 8/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 4.5 | 9/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 3.5 | 7/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.1/100 |
FREERIDE BOOT #3
Boot: Burton Driver X
- CANADA
- UK/EUROPE
Lacing System: Speed Lace (Speed Zone™)
Flex: Stiff (9.5 out of 10)
Rating: 91.6/100
A true freeride boot in every sense of the word.
Stiff as hell, responsive as hell and aggressive as hell.
The Driver X will do just what it suggests – help to drive you hard down the mountain. If you like your boots super aggressive and have a stiff/aggressive board (s), then these just might be the boots for you. In fact the only boots I've ridden that are stiffer are the Ride Insanos (see #5 above) and there's not much difference there.
But they also offer great shock absorption and some awesome traction to help you out when hiking the backcountry.
Add to all of that, some great footprint reduction, allowing you to ride a narrower board for more precision and reducing the risk of catching a boot in the snow on those hard carves, and you’ve just about got yourself the perfect freeride/aggressive all-mountain snowboard boots.
Learn more about the Driver X in the Video Below
Score Breakdown for the Driver X
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 5.0 | 35/35 |
TRACTION | 4.0 | 12/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 3.5 | 7/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.0 | 8/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 4.0 | 8/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 4.5 | 9/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.6/100 |
FREERIDE BOOT #2
Boot: Adidas Acerra 3ST ADV
- CANADA
- uK/EUROPE
Lacing System: Double Boa
Flex: Stiff (8 out of 10)
Rating: 91.6/100
The Acerra are the softest flexing in this list (along with the Vans Verse when you take the tongue stiffeners out) – but still really quite stiff. They’ve just got that little bit more give, which I like. If you’re after more stiffness, then there are stiffer options on this list, but if you want a boot that has just a little more give, but still provides awesome response, then the Accera should be high on your list.
They’re also super shock-absorbing (thanks to the boost tech in their sole), have a really reduced outersole footprint (the best in the business) and are super comfortable.
Learn more about the Acerra in the Video Below
Score Breakdown for the Acerra
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 4.5 | 31.5/35 |
TRACTION | 3.5 | 10.5/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 4.0 | 8/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.0 | 8/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 5.0 | 10/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 5.0 | 10/10 |
COMFORT | 4.5 | 9/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.6/100 |
FREERIDE BOOT #1
Boot: K2 Thraxis
- CANADA
Lacing System: Triple Boa
Flex: Stiff (9 out of 10)
Rating: 93.2/100
And in at #1, we have K2's Thraxis boots.
The Thraxis are bursting with tech and their performance reflects this. You do pay for it though (but in saying that, they are pretty close to the average price of boots on this list - freeride boots are just expensive!).
With all the response you could ask for, great traction for those hiking missions and a locked down, yet comfortable fit (fit is different for everyone though of course), the Thraxis boast everything you need in hard charging, take no prisoner boots - perfect paired with stiff/aggressive boards.
Learn more about the Thraxis in the Video Below
Score Breakdown for the Thraxis
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 5.0 | 35/35 |
TRACTION | 4.5 | 13.5/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 4.5 | 9/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.5 | 9/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 4.0 | 8/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 3.0 | 6/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 93.2/100 |
Over to You…
Well there you have my list of the top freeride boots for the 2020/21 season. I hope this has helped to make your decision easier.
If you are interested in any of the boots in this list check out the links for each boot above to learn more and to check prices.
If you think you would prefer something with just a bit of a softer flex – but still want something that is responsive and performance oriented, check out the link below.
Hi Note!!
Thank you the lot of test! 😉
I have lot of problem the boots. The last 2-3 years testing some boots. I ordered 6-8 boots for testing… 😬. The previous boots Burton Imperial but little bigger than my foot and little softer since some seasons. Staying from my orders Ride Fuse, very comfortable and good heel hold, at home. But the first weekend at the season, broke my arch. I have lot of pain all season, all day. The doctor said, i need the operation, but for the covid, behind the times.
I’coming back the new Imperial boots.
Not bad boots, but i would like stiffer boots for deep carving. I’ m testing Ride Insano at the snowboardshop, very comfortable but I little fear from broke. :). I’am testing the Burton Ion at home, very good flex for me, but i have little pressure point my inside my foot. I’ sending back to the distributor.
I think the next test, Burton Driver X, Ride Insano, Thirty Two TM 2, Vans Infuse, etc… 😅
I have little problems, mid /high arch at my broked foot and the little size foot (40, MP: 25/25.5cm)
I don’t know when find the right size, best flex, comfortable boots without pressure points… 😔😬
What do you think, which boot probe next time? 😉
Sorry bad English… 😅
Peace 👊:
Krisztián
Hi Krisztián
Thanks for your message.
Because of your medium to high arch, I probably wouldn’t look at the Vans Infuse or Verse, just because they tend to not be good for high arches, in my experience and from what other people have told me.
I think the Driver X is a great option to try, given that you like the fit of the Imperial but want something stiffer. If you’re concerned with Ride, due to your experience with the Fuse, then maybe skip that one. I would try the K2 Thraxis as well, if you can – and the TM 2 – if you’re looking for stiff, then the TM 2 XLT will be a better bet. The TM 2 isn’t soft – it’s around 7/10 to my feel, but not as stiff as the other options you’re looking at.
For reference, these are how stiff I found each of these boots:
– TM 2 XLT: 9/10
– TM 2: 7/10
– Driver X: 9.5/10
– Thraxis: 9/10
– Insano: 10/10
– Imperial: 6.5/10
So the regular TM2 was only a little bit stiffer than the Imperial (by my feel).
Hopefully one of the Driver X, TM 2 XLT or Thraxis will fit well for you!
whats up, im considering the adidas accera, wondering how they compare to my current boot, the burton imperial, for an all mountain freeride boot. how would these two compare. i really like the imperials. but might like to try something different
Hi Philip
Thanks for your message.
In my experience, the following are some of the differences:
– Acerra a bit stiffer than the Imperial – like 8/10 for the Acerra versus more like a 6.5/10 for the Imperial (by my feel)
– Largely because of that extra stiffness Acerra a little better for hard carves/bombing with the Imperials a little more forgiving when riding at slower speeds
– Acerra have better shock absorption. That boost in the soles is like walking (or riding) on a cloud)
– Acerra are lower profile. Imperial are quite low profile themselves, but not to the extent of the Acerra. But this is only really a factor if you’re in that borderline zone between regular width and wide boards.
– Comfort-wise, the Acerra were the ever so slightly more comfortable boot for me, but very little difference in it – and also this can be quite subjective with everyone’s feet/ankles/calves being different.
– The Acerra are a little wider. But the Imperial aren’t narrow or anything – I would say the Imperial are wider than average themselves. I have regular width feet and didn’t find either too wide, so this is only really a consideration if you have particularly wide feet or particularly narrow feet, I would say.
Hope this gives you more to go off
Hi Nate any thoughts on Travis Rice boot 20/21 ? I have narrowed my choice to Vans Versa, Infuse and DC T Rice but surprised you haven’t got it on your list! any reason why as I’m leaning towards it over the others, haha. Good site and reviews by the way 😉
Hi Bob
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t ridden the DC Travis Rice, so I couldn’t say, first hand, how I would compare them to the Verse or Infuse. I heard that these boots got a lot softer than they used to be, even though their flex rating from DC didn’t change. But I’ve heard they’re stiffer again now, in the 2021 model, so it’s hard to say even on the flex how they would be. I’m hoping to get on a pair soon, but for now can’t really give you any insight.
Nate, Thanks so much for all these great reviews and responses.
I have been riding Burton boots for the last 14 years. (Sean Whites 2010, Ions 2014 & Ion Custom with reflective fabric 2018). I am disappointed in the longevity of the boots, as they all seem to fall apart by the 3rd season. What do recommend as a good alternative to Burton as I am done spending $500 on boots that have no support from their manufacturer.
For anyone interested: I have had issues with: Ripped stitching on the outside of the boots. Lace clips break their rivets. Their inner speedlace system loses its functionality after a season and does not hold tight throughout a day, meaning I am re-lacing my boots several times a day. The inner liners lose their cushion after a season and are horribly vented aka smelly. And what is more frustrating is Burton customer service denies any fixing or replacement under-warranty as they consider this all “normal wear & tear”. Whereas Burton used to replace or fix all legitimate issues with no questions asked, they would even send you this seasons boots if they did not have the parts. For reference I had a high-back break on my burton custom est binding and they made me wait 10 months for a replacement part, and the part they sent did not match my original binding which they claim is to help reduce their global footprint. When all i hear is that they are saving money. Luckily I could make do with a jerry-rigged binding, but what if you have an issue with a defective part and can’t ride. You will need to wait until they can conveniently send a part, which would mean you are buying a new pair of bindings (or etc) so you can finish your season – and that sucks.
Further, having been a rider for 29 years now I can tell you Burton’s customer service is a fraction of what it once was, this all changed when they sold to a Venture Capital fund in the late 2000’s. And what was once a pinnacle brand of the snowboard industry and did a phenomenal job supporting their equipment and riders now has its hands tied by corporate profit. I have had 3 issues with their customer service. 2 issues they did not back, and the 3rd was the high-back they replaced with a different color, not the experience I would expect when buying premium goods.
Hi A.L.
Thanks for your message and sorry to hear about your experience with their customer service.
For the most part I don’t vouch for durability of gear, as I only test it for a limited time – and I’m often replacing my boots early to get more experience with different brands. Of the boots that I’ve ridden for more than 30 days, Vans have been the best in terms of longevity. I had Vans Auras which I rode for well over 100 days and no issues. I could put them on and ride with them now, no worries. Couldn’t say how many more days they would last but that’s the longest pair of boots I’ve had. The Vans Verse I tested seemed to be very high quality in terms of materials, so my guess is that they would last, but couldn’t say for sure. But if you’re looking for stiff boots and ones that will last, that would be my only insight.
Hope this somewhat helps
Hi, what would you feel would be more suitable to pair with a Capita Mercury, older Flow Nxt at bindings ( will change them to nx2 gt prob) for carving, pow, some jumps and side hits, no park…thraxis or Burton Ion boa’s?
Also.I can find the 2020 thraxis for about 100 $ cheaper than the 2021, and I see no diff except the colorway?
Hi Paul
Thanks for your message.
Assuming fit was the same, probably the Ion Boa, just because I see it as a closer flex match. However, with boots, I don’t mind them being stiffer than the rest of the setup, so I don’t think the Thraxis is out or range flex-wise. Personally I typically like to go either match or stiffer with boots versus the rest of the setup. For me the Thraxis felt like a 9/10, maybe 8.5 – and the Ion Boa a 7/10. The Mercury a 6.5/10 for me.
In terms of if you did go Thraxis, then assuming you can get the 2020 in your size, then I would go for it. As far as I know there are no major changes between 2020 and 2021 models.
If you think you want to go stiffer then I would go Thraxis, but if you want more of a mid-stiff flex, then Ion-Boa. Also, if you need any kind of reduced footprint, the Ion Boa is a lower profile boot.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
I like the claimed durability of the Thraxis, and the tripple boa setup, but not sure if I’ll need the stifness for my riding. I dont do backcountry more than 40% of the time, so the Ion’s might be a better fit, especially since the reduced footprint might be better suited for the width of the board in the 159 size and size 11 boots. Generally, I like the idea of the stiffer boot more than I actually need one. I have a narrow foot so not sure if thats a considerarion…..can only try the Butrons locally, no K2 dealer here.
Hi Paul
Yeah, then probably Ion Boa is best bet for all those reason’s including having that reduced footprint for 11s on the Mercury. Burton’s tend to be mid-wide, but I find with medium feet that I have no issues with mid-wide and wide. So with narrow feet you’re probably good with mid-wide, but if you’re able to try on locally, even if they don’t necessarily have the Ion Boa, then I would still do that for sure. K2s are a narrower boot – I would say they’re medium in terms of width.
Can you make a review on the thirtytwo focus boa?
Hi Dave
Been a long time since I rode the Focus Boa and didn’t take great notes back then – wasn’t doing full reviews of boots back then. If I can get old of a pair to test this year, I’ll put out a review for them.
Hi, Nate.
I’m looking to upgrade from my size 11 Burton Motos (13+ years old). I’m riding a 161 Mullair with Genesis (L) bindings. Thinking the Motos are a very soft boot – especially that old – and looking for something stiffer/more responsive with a small footprint. I’m a freerider who likes to charge, not interested in pipe or park.
I’m debating between Photon Boa and Imperial – what’s your recommendation? A rep I chatted with on the Burton site recommended going to a 10.5 in either model as my mondo size is 28/28.5.
Great site BTW, really appreciate the in-depth product detail and advice!
Hi Gary
Thanks for your message.
Yeah, the Moto’s are pretty soft to begin with – after 13 years I imagine they are super-soft. And to drive the Mullair and for your riding style, I definitely agree that something stiffer is a great idea.
Both the Photon Boa and Imperial are fairly similar boots, with the Photon being maybe 1/2 a notch stiffer, by my feel. The other main difference is the lacing system – with the Photon being Boa and Imperial speed lace. I slightly prefer Boa myself to speed lace, but the lacing system isn’t enough on its own to make me choose between boots, unless it’s the tie breaker, which in this case it might be.
In terms of sizing to a 10.5, I would be careful, if you can’t try on first. Most people I speak to can’t fit into a boot exactly on their mondo. Typically you’d need to go half a size higher. So if you’re mondo is more like 28.5, I would still go 11, if you don’t have the chance to try on. However, if it’s closer to 28, then the 10.5 might be doable. Personally, I have a 27.3 Mondo and size 10 is the best size for Burton for me. But I can even ride a 10.5 pretty comfortably, particularly for demoing purposes where I’m not spending enough time in it to pack it out. If buying a Burton boot I would go 10, but can ride a 10.5. so If you’re longest foot is 28.5, I would be hesitant to try a 10.5 in a Burton boot. That’s my experience anyway.
Hope this helps
What boots would you pair with a Jones Ultra craft with Apollo bindings?
Hi G$
Anything from this list would be suitable, IMO. I haven’t ridden the Ultra Craft, but it looks fairly stiff by specs, so I would be looking at something at least 8/10 in terms of flex in the boots – with the Apollo bindings too being quite stiff. So yeah, something from this list that fit you the best. Preferable to be able to try on in person, but if you can’t and not sure which brands tend to fit you best, check out this for a few things:
Sizing Snowboard Boots: The Different Brands
Hope this helps
Hello,
I just purchased the Burton Flight Attendant and the Burton X-base bindings. i’m looking at the Driver X for a boot. Do you think this boot is too stiff for this board?
Thanks,
Clay
Hi Clayton
Thanks for your message.
Potentially too stiff. But I think it depends on how stiff you like your boots. I try to match the flex of a setup fairly closely in terms of flex, however, when it comes to bindings and boots, and particularly boots, I’d much sooner go stiffer than softer. Like, even if I’m riding a really soft board – like a 3/10 flex, I still wouldn’t want boots softer than 5/10. Bindings I could go 4/10. If I’m riding a mid-flexing board, I’m happy with 5/10 binding and boot flex, but wouldn’t want to go softer than that. If I’m riding a mid-stiff board (like the Flight Attendant), I wouldn’t want to go softer than 7/10 for both bindings and boots. And I would sooner go stiffer than softer – like I would prefer to go 8/10 or 9/10 for bindings on the FA before I would go 5/10, 6/10. And for boots, I would even prefer 9/10 flex vs 6/10. I would probably still prefer to go more 7/10, 8/10 flex for boots on the FA, but that’s my preference no to go too stiff. If you know that you like really stiff boots, then I think the Driver X could work on the FA. They probably wouldn’t be my choice, but they are certainly doable if you like stiff boots. And they would match well with the X-Base, IMO.
Hope this makes sense/helps
Hi, deciding between getting a new pair of DriverX or the Acerra.
I have been riding the DriverX for a while but want to get a new pair.
Very tempted by the Acerra because of the Boost shock absorption is it significantly better then the DriverX? Also are they similar to the DriverX in terms of flex or quite a bit softer?
Are they closer to the Ion or DriverX flex wise?
If I am reding a DriverX 11 I assume I have to get a Acerra 10.5 is that correct?
Cheers,
Suebo
Hi Suebo
Thanks for your message.
In terms of sizing, yeah I would go 10.5 for the Acerra, is you ride 11 for the Driver X.
In terms of flex, I would say close to half way between the Driver X and Ion, but slightly towards the Ion. I’d say Ion 7/10, Acerra 8/10 and Driver X 10/10, or borderline 9.5/10. Older Ion’s I thought were more 7.5/10 but are just a touch softer now.
The Shock Absorption is a good step better in terms of shock absorption. My head works in numbers – so 4/5 for Driver X in terms of shock absorption. I still find they absorb shock fairly well. The Acerra on another level in that respect – 5/5 for sure, IMO.
Hope this helps with your decision
Great thanks.
The DriverX in my experience drop rather quickly from a 10 to a 9 or even 8.5 once broken in, and stay there for a while.
Do the Acerra also drop in flex like that once broken in?
Or do they come broken in like the new Ion for example?
Hi Suebo
Good to know re the Driver X. I don’t test boots for long enough to really get a feel for how long they keep their flex, so I couldn’t really say for sure, but from what I’ve heard Adidas boots tend to keep their flex a little more than Burton boots – but I think it definitely does depend on the model too. But I’ve heard the Acerra is decent in terms of keeping it’s flex. But I’m not sure how it compares to the Driver X.
Hi! Updated list with this years boots coming?
Hi Johan
Yeah the boots lists will be updated for sure. Hopefully soon! Super busy at the moment, but working on it
Hey Nate, do know if there is a difference in terms of stiffness between Thirty Two Jones MTB, Jones TM-2 XLT and the non Jones TM-2 XLT?
Hi Mark
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t ridden the Jones MTB or Jones TM-2 XLT, but from what I can tell the TM-2 XLT is the same flex as the TM-TWO XLT and the MTB is around the same, but it has the “recoil” which are inserts you can have in or out. With them in it makes the boot a bit stiffer and with them out a bit softer. According to 32, you could range between 8/10 flex or 10/10 flex with or without these. Vs a 9/10 flex on the TM-2 XLT and TM-2 Jones XLT.
Hope this helps with your decision
Hi Nate,
As per my comment in the bindings section I have finally decided to go with the Genesis X for my Mullair and Custom X (rather than Falcor…). Got a really good price on the Genesis X and since I had very good experience with Burton bindings felt a bit more confident with that decision. I reckon there is no point taking both is there (or are they very dissimilar)?
Now, I am also looking at new boots I wanted to buy at the end of the season and I’m not sure which ones would suit my set up best. I currently am on a 2011 Ruler (US 11) which (possibly due to lack of comparison) are just fine but I was wondering whether a stiffer boot would be better. I mostly go off piste and carve down groomers. I had a look at the Burton Ion and Driver X and was wondering whether you could give me some advice if either of these would be a good fit (or if you’d suggest something different)?
Thanks a lot for your advice in advance
Dom
Hi Dom
Thanks for the update. I would say that the Genesis X and Falcor are too similar to have both. The only reason you might want both, is if you wanted to have both boards always with bindings on them and didn’t want to have to swap the bindings over.
In terms of boots, assuming you want to stay Burton I would say the Ion (7.5/10 flex) or the Photon Boa (8/10 flex) would be a good match to your setup. I think going a little stiffer would be a good idea. The Driver X is very stiff (10/10 flex, I would say) and whilst they wouldn’t be completely out of place on your boards, if you’re used to the Ruler (5/10 flex by my feels), I think they are going to feel very stiff and unforgiving. So, I probably wouldn’t go that stiff unless you know that you like you’re boots really stiff. And since you say you feel fine with the Ruler’s I think they would feel too stiff. The Ion and Photon would work well though, IMO – or you could look at the SLX, if you wanted a little more freedom (7/10 flex, I would say).
Hope this helps
Thanks very much for the feedback Nate! That’s actually what I thought but wanted to double check. Sales on in Europe now so managed to get my hands on the Ions at a good price too. Will check them out and see what they feel like. Very helpful input, thanks again!
Btw, did you ever encounter any issues with the genesis x (or other double take buckle bindings) and ice? I rode my new bindings in Switzerland at average temperatures around -7 celsius and had issues with ice building up underneath the tooth releasing the ratchet so opening the bindings was very hard….
Cheers
Dom
Hi Dom
You’re very welcome.
I haven’t had that issue with double take buckles (ride the Burton Malavita as my control test bindings, so I use bindings with double take buckles a lot). I don’t often get days below -7 celcius where I ride (if you don’t take into account wind chill factor). But do sometimes, and haven’t had any issues. I was riding with my brother once and he was having difficulty unbinding at one point. He got it loose eventually and then it was fine the rest of the day. Didn’t occur to me that it could have been because of ice build up, but it’s possible as I do remember that being a particularly cold day. I don’t imagine it will be a regular issue. Hopefully not.
Hi Nate
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Have received the Ions now and first impression is very good (think it was good tho not to go with stiffer boots as the difference to my rulers is definitely more than noticeable!).
In terms of the brinings that’s exactly what happened to me. Temperatures are Usually a bit lower where I ride as it’s relatively high altitude. I’ll see the next couple of times I ride and might then speak with Burton if the issue persists…
Cheers
Dom
You’re very welcome Dom. Awesome that you’re enjoying the Ions. Yeah, going from Ruler to Driver X would have been quite a shock to the system for sure!
Hey Nate, i’m looking To buy some new boots for this season and I really loke the way you rate the boots! I was wondering about the northwave domain… do you get a chance to rate them? I have seen a lot of good review but was wondering how much they score on your grid?! Thanks
Hi Charles
Unfortunately Northwave isn’t a brand that I currently test. I’ve heard good things about them, and would like to have the opportunity to in the future, but don’t currently. Wish I could be more help
Today i have tried in the shop the Response and the Judge. The response has a much smaller Shell, the Judge is huge.
But the Response didnt’t felt comfy.
I Will go to try on the Trident, what’s your overall opinion about them?
Hi Francesco
Yeah Adidas have the lowest profile outersole at the moment of any boots I’ve come across, so most look pretty big in comparison!
Ride boots aren’t as low profile as Adidas, but they are more low profile than DC, so they might work for you. The Trident is a great boot, IMO. It only missed out on the top 5 by one spot. It’s definitely recommendable. You can check out more here:
>>Ride Trident Review
When I did that review I rated it as an all-mountain binding and I’m yet to update it. But I changed it to freeride after I decided not to have anything over a flex of 7/10 in the all-mountain list. I have had a couple of people comment about leaking issues. Not sure if those have been resolved or not in the later models.
Hi Nate, I have tried also the Burton Ion Boa and they felt very comfy, I didn’t get the chance yet to try the Trident.
Anyway how you compare the Ion boa vs the Trident?
Thanks
Hi Francesco
Yeah the Ion Boas are sweet boots. Pricey, but nice. You can see how I’ve rated them at the following:
>>My Top All Mountain (medium-stiff flex) Snowboard Boots
They are what I would consider a 7/10 flex. So a touch softer than the Trident, IMO, but not by heaps. Certainly still suitable for all-mountain-freeride style riding. The one thing I don’t like about them is that they don’t have an articulation cuff – but if you’re not doing any freestyle stuff, that’s not a big thing.
I wonder why a high end boot like the Ion has no articulation… I Think its a must this days.
I have tried Also the Thirtytwo Focus Boa, they fit nice but are very heavy.
I can’t decide between the Insano, Trident, Focus Boa and Ion….
Hi Francesco
Yeah most do have that articulation these days. I guess they’re just going for something that’s for a particular feel with those. Or maybe they’ve just been in the line so long and don’t want to change that feature?
Ho Nate, could you please send me the full list of the best freeride boots? I am looking at the DC Judge and the Ride Trident, but your list Will give me a better idea about what boot to get. Thanks
Hi Francesco
Thanks for your message. This is the full list, in order:
Adidas Acerra
Burton Driver X
Ride Insano
k2 Thraxis
DC Travis Rice
Ride Trident
Thirty Two Jones MTB
Thirty Two Sequence
k2 T1
DC Torstein Horgmo
Burton Photon
Salomon Malamute
k2 Aspect
Thirty Two Focus Boa
DC Scendent
The DC Judge I rated in my All-Mountain list (I give it a 7/10 flex and this list is for 8/10 flex and up). But if I was to bring it into this list, it would fit in just above the Thirty Two Focus Boa.
Thanks for quick really.
So the DC Judge Would you recommended for all-mountain/freeride use? How is the footprint reduction?
My current freeride boots are Nike Kaiju, but are old and soft Now.
I dont want to go too stiff as the Insano, so I am looking at the Judge, Trident and Response ADV. I live in Czech Republic and seems to be impossibile to find the Acerra Adv here.
Thanks
Hi Francesco
DC are typically middle of the road for reduced footprint – so not amazing but not too bad either.
In terms of flex, this is what I got from the mentioned boots:
~ Insano: 9/10
~ Trident: 8/10
~ Judge: 7/10
~ Response ADV: 6/10
The Judge would be best suited for all-mountain or freeride, if you don’t want super-stiff. I would say response 3.5/5 but good heel hold, decent traction and shock absorption. Not super comfortable, but everyone is different for comfort, typically.
Sorry, but all this industrial boots are really too fragile.
I’ve riden many brands, and they were dead after 3 or 4 months (sewings cut or broken, shape tired, sole comes away…). And they are not made for real mountain and walking or touring.
I’m not very heavy 72kg (about 160lbs) but i have a powerful style that tired the boots quickly.
The only good brand for me, after more than 30 years riding the snow is Fitwell (Fitwell Boots). A small company with real quality products handmade in Italy. Of course, there is no freestyle boots, just freeride/mountain boots. Perfect for exposed riding, touring, carving and freeride.
Hey
Thanks for your input.
I don’t make any judgement on durability on gear as I typically don’t have it long enough to be able to make that call. But in my experience boots tend to last me between 70 and 100 days, which is 1 1/2 to 2 typical seasons for me. If you’re riding more often or doing a lot more hiking and that kind of thing, I can see them lasting less – and also if you’re riding quite aggressively most of the time.
I’d never heard of Fitwell. Thanks for pointing them out.
Hi Nate ! I´ve another question, wich boot would you recommend me thinking in durability, the Ride Insano or the Salomon Malamute ? Because I`ve been reading many reviews about both boots and many people say that the Ride Insano don’t last more than a full season.
Hi Patricio
One thing that I don’t really comment on is durability because I never have gear for long enough to test it for durability. Typically I have found boots to last anywhere from 50 to 100 days. I can’t comment on the Insano’s particularly though.
And lasting a full season depends on your definition of a full season too. A 10 day season is a lot different to a 100 day season. If you’re only doing say 10 days a season, then I would expect you should have your boot for at least 4-5 years. But if your season is 50+ days, then they might only last 1-2 years.
If you’re worried about the durability of the Insanos, the Malamutes are great boots – but I couldn’t tell you one way or another if they are more durable. One thing to watch out for on the Malamutes is that the reduced footprint isn’t great on them. So, if you’ve got large feet, then that would be something to watch for.
Thanks again for your time Nate ! I`ll probably buy the Insano !
You’re very welcome Patricio.
Hey Nate !
I want to know what do you think about 32 TM TWO XLT boots ? how stiff you found them on your scale ?
Hi Patricio
I would say that the TM Twos are Mid-Stiff. They’re not off the scale stiff, but they’re more than a medium flexer. I’d say 7/10.
thanks Nate your answer was very helpfull !
You’re very welcome! Thanks for visiting the site
Ey Nate , first off thanks for the reviews , i just want’d to comment on my experience on boots, bin riding for almost twenty yrs and have gone thru the northwave , nidecker ,burton boots trial and errors and determined that burton ion worked best for my application of riding (im sixty now) i ride an average of 50-80 days a season just carving and was blowing thru boots, and was fortunate to have burton warranty my boots for awile (then they got wise and would send me the same yr model so i couldnt return them) cause i would wear them out in a season. i carefully take my boots apart and dry them every time i rode them. when i would return them they asked how many days i had on them , they couldnt believe how well they looked and for how many days i had on them!, they told me the average boarder only puts 10-12 days a season riding. my thoughts are im paying 400 bucks for boots and would wear em out after being really good on taking care of them. i wish they would make a bullet proof boot for us old school surf the sno boarders, anyway im going for the driver x , i believe will be best for my application! oh i also recommend getting fitted insoles as they add to ur riding ability 15-20 percent in my opinion. Thanks man Rick
Hey Rick
Thanks for your input. Appreciate it.
Yeah boots don’t last that long when you’re doing 50+ days that’s for sure. It would feel like they lasted a lot longer if you were only doing 10 days a season and they lasted 5 years! But when you do 50+ and you’re getting new boots every season it doesn’t feel like they last that long, for sure.
Thanks for the advice on fitted insoles. I haven’t personally used fitted insoles but it sounds like they’ve made a real difference for you – I might just have to try them.
Nate,
Really appreciate the run down on these boots! My question pertains to the D.C. TRS, I have found a size 12 and I wear a 12 in work boots and such. I know snowboard boots are hitting closer to true to size these days and wondered what your experience was.
Hi Alex
In my experience snowboard boots are typically 1/2 a size down or true to size, these days. For the DC Travis Rice I would say true to size. But everyone seems to have a different experience with boot fitting. I’ve heard some say that they had to go a full size up. This isn’t my experience but I’ve seen a couple of reviews that say this.
So I would say that these definitely aren’t the type that you would need to go 1/2 size down for but potentially that you’d have to go up for. I would say that the 12s would be best if you where 12s in work boots – but no guarantees just based on others experiences with them – which is why is always good when possible to try boots on in person – if not, then make sure you buy them from somewhere that will take them back if they don’t fit.
Hope this helps
Hey Nate,
Great reviews and very helpful!
Trying to understand why the Thraxis scored low on adjustability, despite the 3 Boas and the comments about great heel-hold.
Can you explain? Thanks!
Hi Josh
Maybe a little bit harsh to give it a 2.5 but certainly no more than a 3/5. The reason for this is that all 3 Boas are kind of centered around that heel hold. They have amazing heel hold – and part of that is the fact that all 3 Boas actually help with that heel hold. But because both the upper and lower Boas overlap at the ankle (which is the case with most Boas and why Boas tend to be good with heel hold but not as adjustable). So when you crank the upper boa it will pull around the ankle and when you crank the lower boa it will pull the wires around the ankle. They’re not completely independent – which means if you want tight around your lower boot and looser on the upper if you like a bit more flex around there, you can’t really do it that well.
This isn’t a problem for a lot of people though. I personally really like great heel hold and I’m happy to sacrifice a little bit of lower/upper adjustability to get it – others are the other way around.
Hope this explains it.
Nate’s response is 100% accurate, just wanted to confirm the same; stiffness is 8-9/10. The “problem” is that you can’t precisely adjust zones even with 3 BOAs, because they are overlapping. Clearly, it is a keeper, despite on the latter. Make sure the boot size/bindings is right and play with boas to make thrm comfy as much as possible.
Hi Lenka. Thanks for the input. Good to hear someone elses experience with the these.
Hi Nate, I have the 2009 driver x and love them. Have you got any idea if size wise the driver x’s have stayed the same. Also, just compared to Ions, what gives them the edge? I like stiff boots also since I’m 6,5 and 200 pounds. Thanks!
Hey Tim
I’m not that familiar with the 2009s but I think that the sizing should be pretty consistent. I think that the boots, though still super-stiff, have softened slightly in the last few years – but the idea behind that is to make them easier to break in. They are slightly more forgiving but still really stiff and super responsive.
The Ions aren’t as stiff, so if you like them really stiff then the Driver X’s are the better bet. The Ion’s are marginally more comfortable but there’s very little in it these days as they’ve made the Driver Xs more comfortable. The Driver Xs have just that little bit better response. And they have slightly better traction – which is good if you do any hiking in the backcountry. That said, the Ions also have great traction but the Driver Xs just have the slight edge. I think that the Driver Xs have superior shock absorption over the Ions too.
Hope this helps
Thanks for the very swift reply! I think I’ll order a pair!
Hey Nate,
thank you for that very helpful list! I sent you an email via the contact page but I think it didn’t work. I just wanted to ask if you could send me your spreadsheet with all the tested freeride boots – that’d be very nice! 🙂
Thanks!
Hey
I didn’t get your email. Thanks for letting me know. I will have to check and make sure everything is working properly there.
I’ll send that freeride boot list through to you now. Let me know if you don’t get it.
was the salomon malamut considered!?
mind sharing the list of 25 boots your looked at?
Hey
Thanks for the message
Yes the Malamut was considered. It scored 83/100 in my rating system and was 8th on the list.
If you want to send me a private message by going to the contact page and I can email you the spreadsheet with all the freeride boots I looked at and their score breakdowns.
Hey Nate,
Thanks a lot for all your insightful articles!
As you might remember from your snowboard width post (I´m the one getting the Hel Yes) I’m looking at getting some new gear which includes Boots (and bindings).
The boots you mention here sound really nice but would be a bit of a stretch for me (price wise) because I don’t get to ride too much and have to renew everthing this winter. Do you have any other recommendations? I was looking at the Burton Ruler because I can get them somewhat cheaply but I think that they might not be stiff enough.
I will be going into stores to test some boots but I would like some references 🙂
Thanks a lot!
Hey Manuel
The ruler is a mid-flexing boot – a 6/10 on Burton’s scale – so if you’re looking for something quite stiff then it may not be stiff enough for you.
Unfortunately stiffer boots do tend to be more pricey but below I’ve mentioned a couple that were close to making this list but are a little bit cheaper.
Burton Imperial – stiffness = 7/10 – price = $299 (USD Recommended price) – scored 81.5/100
K2 T1 – stiffness = 8/10 – price also $299 recommended price in USD – scored 85/100
If you’re happy with a 6/10 stiffness then the Ruler are also a good option especially if you can get them cheap.
You could also check out these links for outlet stores to see if you can find a past year’s model of any of these boots which you’ll be able to get at a cheaper price – after you’ve tried them on in store. I saw past year’s models of some of these boots – it just depends if they’re cheap enough still and if they have them in your size.
evo outlet store men’s snowboard boots
the-house outlet store men’s snowboard boots
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other question and let me know what you go with in the end.