Hello and welcome to my Never Summer Proto Slinger review.
In this review, I will take a look at the Proto Slinger as a freestyle snowboard.
As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Proto Slinger a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how it compares with other freestyle snowboards.
Overall Rating
Board: Never Summer Proto Slinger 2021
Price: $549
Style: Freestyle
Flex Rating: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Flex Feel on Snow: Medium-Soft (3.5/10)
Rating Score: 91.8/100
Compared to other Men’s Freestyle Boards
Out of the 37 men’s freestyle snowboards that I rated:
Overview of the Proto Slinger’s Specs
Check out the tables for the Proto Slinger’s specs and available sizes.
Specs
Style: | Freestyle |
Price: | $549 |
Ability Level: |  |
Flex: |  |
Feel: |  |
Turn Initiation: | Fast |
Edge-hold: |  |
Camber Profile: | Hybrid Rocker Never Summer's "Shock Wave Rocker Camber" |
Shape: | |
Setback Stance: | Centered |
Base: | Durasurf Sintered 4501 |
Weight: | Feels Normal |
Sizing
LENGTH (cm) | Waist Width (mm) | Rec Rider Weight (lb) | Rec Rider Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
146 | 245 | not available | n/a |
149 | 247 | n/a | n/a |
151 | 248 | n/a | n/a |
153 | 250 | n/a | n/a |
156 | 253 | n/a | n/a |
159 | 255 | n/a | n/a |
154X | 258 | n/a | n/a |
157X | 262 | n/a | n/a |
160X | 264 | n/a | n/a |
Who is the Proto Slinger Suited To?
The Proto Slinger is a great option for those looking for a freestyle oriented deck to hit the park on, but that can also do pretty well on the rest of the mountain, particularly if you're using the mountain like a park. It's soft and buttery but also has a good dose of camber, which helps with carving.
Not great for powder and not quite for a beginner, just because of all that camber, but low intermediate and up should be good on this board.
The Proto Slinger in More Detail
O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Proto Slinger is capable of.
Demo Info
Board: Never Summer Proto Slinger 2021, 156cm (253mm waist width)
Date: February 29, 2020
Conditions: Cloudy with some blue sky and sun at times. Perfect visibility.
Quite cold at -4°C (24.8°F) and was supposed to be -11°C (12.2°F) with wind chill, but didn't feel as cold as that.
20cm (8") of fresh snow overnight, so plenty of fresh to test in. Conditions were awesome on and off groomer.
Bindings angles: +15/-15
Stance width: 545mm (21.5″)
Stance Setback: Centered
Width at Inserts: 263mm (10.35")
Rider Height: 6'0"
Rider Weight: 175lbs
Rider Boot Size: US10 Salomon Lo-Fi
Bindings Used: Burton Malavita M
Note: The Proto Slinger replaces the Funslinger. The Proto Slinger is quite similar to the old Funslinger. The only real change is the new "Shock Wave Rocker Camber" camber profile, which adds more camber. Otherwise it's very similar to the old Funslinger.
Powder
Had a bit to test in. Though not super deep, it was moderate. Any board is fun in powder, IMO, and the Proto Slinger is no exception. But I could feel from the brief time I had it in there that if it was deeper and you were in it for a longer period of time, then keeping the nose floating would become quite a back leg burning effort. But in 20cm (8") for brief amounts of time, was fine.
It's true twin and centered and whilst it has a little rocker in the profile, it's not a whole lot, so not really designed for powder.
Carving & Turning
Carving: Fun board for short sharp carves. Certainly not worlds better than the old Funslinger for carving, but just that little bit more carvy, with that extra camber. Not as suited to big, long carves, but fun for short sharp ones.
Turning: General turning is really fun on this board. It feels snappy and it's easy to initiate turns on.
Maneuverability at Slow Speeds: Really easy to maneuver at slow speeds. Quick and easy edge to edge transition, without having to put much effort in.
Skidded Turns: Given all that camber, it's surprisingly forgiving of skidded turns. Not like a beginner board with lots of rocker, but still pretty forgiving of them.
Speed
Given it's flex, being a centered twin and all that, it's never going to be a bomber, but it can handle a fair bit of speed well enough.
Uneven Terrain
Nice and maneuverable for slow speed weaving through bumps and going over top of bumps is good. Not a crud crusher - you get bounced around a bit in it, but not terrible either.
Jumps
So much fun for jumps! Great pop and so easy to access, and just everything about this board for jumps. The only reason I didn't give it 5/5 is that it's not quite as suited to really large jumps, in terms of speed of approach you need and stability of landing, but for small to medium jumps and side hits, it would be hard to think of a board I preferred more than this one.
Pop: Great pop and so easy to access. Effortless and snappy pop.
Approach: It's not an ultra stable feel for larger jumps, but it's stable enough for those approaches to most size jumps and has great maneuverability for trickier approaches.
Landing: A great balance of solid and forgiving.
Side-hits: Perfection. So maneuverable for trickier approaches and great pop that's super easy to access. Landing and setting up switch is awesome too.
Small jumps/Big Jumps: Best suited to small to medium jumps, IMO, but can handle larger jumps too.
Switch
As good as it gets, IMO.
Spins
Pretty much perfect for spins. The only reason, again, that this didn't get 5/5, is that it's not as suited to large tricks. But for anything else - you know for those of use mere mortals that typically don't send it massive - it's amazing. Easy to get the spin around, great for setting up and landing switch and great/effortless pop.
Jibbing
Great for jibs. Felt confident hitting them. The setup is great, the pop on and off great and felt good on the jib too.
Butters
Super buttery. I wondered if it would become less butterable with the new "Shock Wave" camber profile, but it's still super easy and fun to butter with.
Score Breakdown and Final Verdict
Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
JUMPS | 4.5 | 18/20 |
JIBBING | 4.0 | 16/20 |
SWITCH | 5.0 | 15/15 |
BUTTERING | 5.0 | 10/10 |
SPINS | 4.5 | 9/10 |
UNEVEN TERRAIN | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
POWDER | 2.0 | 2/5 |
CARVING/TURNS | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
SPEED | 3.0 | 3/5 |
PIPE | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.8/100 |
Like buttering, jumps, sidehits, jibs, treating the mountain like a park, when not in the park - and just like a springy, snappy, playful yet explosive ride, in general? Then the Proto Slinger is a board you should get excited about. One of those boards that I just felt buzzed from after unstrapping. This one might have to be added to the quiver this year!
More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online
If you want to learn more about the Proto Slinger, or if you are ready to buy, or if you just want to research prices and availability, check out the links below.
If you want to check out some other freestyle snowboard options, or if you want to compare how the Proto Slinger compares to other freestyle snowboards, then check out the next link.
I forgot to mention in my previous message that my ride warpis is a 154 and my bindings are union atlas L!
Hi Mike
Thanks for your message.
Yeah I think 157X is what I would say for, for this board too. When I rode the Warpig, I found the 154 to feel more like a 160, so I think the 157X Proto Slinger is still going to feel smaller than that. It’s certainly sizing down a bit from your all-mountain size, IMO. There is a chance you’d get on the 156, but it would be pushing it width-wise. If you have low profile 11s and aren’t planning on carving too hard when riding the Proto Slinger, then I think 156 is doable. You could also potentially even go 154X, if you wanted something super short/soft and playful, but I think that’s getting a bit too small for your specs. I would be leaning towards 156 or 157X for you, depending on whether or not you think you could squeeze onto the 156.
For reference, I loved the 156 and bought it – 6’0″, 175lbs, size 10 boots. If I was to get it as my do-it-all, I’d likely go for the 159, but it’s my new freestyle board.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate, thanks a lot! So no wide (x) version for you? Before my Ride Warpig i was always against a wide version, but after the Warpig i like the idea. Also a lot of the snowshops recommend getting a wide version..
Hi Mike
With 11s I would say wide 80% of the time. If I had 11s, I would seriously consider going wide on the Proto Slinger, but not with 10s. If I had really low profile 11s, rode with +15/-15 angles and wasn’t planning on doing any real aggressive carves with the board, I would consider the 156, but even in that case would seriously consider the 157X. But with 10s (or 9.5s depending on the brand), I wouldn’t go wide, unless I was going with a specific short/wide board, like the Warpig or if I was sizing down. 156 for a dedicated freestyle board for me isn’t what I would consider sizing down. I would look at the 154X potentially, if I wanted something a little wider. But you’ve got a little size on me both in terms of height/weight and boot size, so I would err towards 157X for you.
Hi Nate, just reading you kind and helpfull advice regarding board sizing.. I’m in a bit of a pickle, i am a bit taller and heavier than Chip. My bootsize is 11 (44 in eu), im 190cm so thats 6ft3inch and my weight is 85 kg (185-190lbs). I already have a stiff board for carving, a powder board and something in between (the ride warpig). I’m leaning towards the 157X, what is your advice for the NS Proto Slinger?
Thanks Nate, hope you are doing well!
Hi Nate,
Great review. What size would you recommend for 165-170#, 6’0″, size 11 Tactical ADVs and +12, -12 binding angles? I’m high intermediate or barely advanced. Generally like to charge hard and carve, but want to slow it down a little and do ground tricks on this board.
Thanks in advance!
Chip
Hi Chip
Thanks for your message.
The answer would depend on whether you have another board or not. Just want to clarify whether you have another board you like to charge hard and carve on and would be using the Slinger mostly for your ground tricks.
If this would be your only board, then you’d probably want to go a little longer and maybe even wider – something like the 157X or even 159. It’s a great carver for how soft it is, and for how soft it is, it handles speed pretty well, but certainly still not a bomber. Very freestyle oriented. Going a little longer and/or wider would help with your charging and carving, but it’s still a board that’s going to be somewhat limited for that side of things.
Assuming you have another board for carve hard/bomb, then I think 156 or even 154X would be good options. With Tactical ADV 11s, you would be unlikely to have any issues with the 156 width-wise, particularly if it’s a board you wouldn’t be doing any hard carves on. But if you wanted to go a little shorter and get a bit more of a wider platform, then the 154X would certainly be in your wheelhouse too.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
Thanks, Nate.
I should have clarified: I have other boards. This one would be my softest board and I’d use it for tricks (butters, spins off rollers, a little jibbing, maybe little jumps). While I generally like charging and laying it over, I know this board isn’t great at that. I’m ok with losing some of that, but don’t want to give up too much. Considering all that, would you lean towards 156 or 154w for me? Would you please explain thought process between the two?
Thanks again.
Chip
Hi Chip
Apologies for the slow response. Currently on vacation.
It’s a tight call between the 154X and 156 for you, but I think I would be leaning towards 154X for you.
Even though your Tactical ADV 11s would likely work for a regular width if you’re not going to be laying it over too much, with Adidas 11s, your feet would also not be too small for the 154X – with your foot size, I would say that both would be equally as maneuverable with the 154X being a little shorter and your feet likely still reaching the edges of the board.
And going a little shorter can help with swing weight for spins, make buttering easier (though in this case it’s super butterable anyway, so prob not a heap of difference there). And going that little bit wider will give you a bit more room to lay it over a little when you feel for it, and an overall bigger surface area for a bigger landing platform.
I think you would get on with both sizes well, and there’s not much in it, but I would be leaning 154X for you.