• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Snowboarding Profiles

  • SNOWBOARDS
    • Top Snowboard Picks 2025-2026
    • Snowboard Reviews
    • Snowboard Buying Guide
    • Snowboard Length Sizing
    • Snowboard Width Sizing
    • For Beginners
    • Setup/Maintenance
  • BINDINGS
    • Top Bindings Picks 2025-2026
    • Binding Reviews
    • Binding Buying Guides
    • Binding Sizing
    • Binding and Board Compatbility
    • For Beginners
    • Bindings Setup
  • SNOWBOARD BOOTS
    • Top Boots Picks 2025-2026
    • Boot Reviews
    • Boot Buying Guides
    • Sizing and Fit
    • Boot Fit by Brand
    • For Beginners
    • More
  • OUTERWEAR
    • Featured Snowboard Jackets 2025-2026
    • Jacket Buying Guide
    • Pants Buying Guide
    • Goggles Buying Guide
    • Helmet Buying Guide
    • Base Layers Buying Guide
    • More
  • About
    • About SP
    • Our Patreon

Ride Algorhythm Snowboard Review

Ride Algorhythm Snowboard Review 2025-2026

Last Updated January 26, 2026 by Nate

The Ride Algorhythm is a board I've been wanting to ride since it came out and one way or another it just kept eluding me. On paper it's a super versatile ride that could be a great option as a one-board-quiver. 

However, in practice it was pretty disappointing for me. All-be-it in some pretty lousy conditions, so not really a fair test, but in what I had, it was not a great experience, for me. 

In this review, I will take a look at the Algorhythm as an all-mountain snowboard, which we define as the do-it-all swiss-army knives of boards. 

As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Algorhythm a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how it compares with other men's all-mountain snowboards.

Disclosure, as this was an atypical test for us

Note that the day of testing, as you'll see in the conditions section below, was particularly slushy and there weren't really any harder conditions to test in on the day. Typically I have a good variety of conditions to test in, but this was tested on a public demo day, so I was unable to choose the day or the location. So this was a less comprehensive test than our typical reviews and for the most part just reflects how the Algorhythm felt in slushy conditions.

We typically try not to test at public demo days for this reason, unless we know that there will be favorable (and by favorable in this context, I mean variable), but we were unable to acquire any Ride or K2 boards outside of this demo day, so it was our only opportunity to test them.    

Overall Rating

Board: Ride Algorhythm

Price: $679

Style: All-Mountain

Flex Rating: Medium

Flex Feel on Snow: Medium bordering on mid-stiff (6.5/10)

Rating Score: 77.7/100

Compared to other Men’s All-Mountain Boards

Of the 32 current model men's all-mountain snowboards that we tested:

  • The average score was 84.6/100
  • The highest score was 93.4/100
  • The lowest score was 71.7/100
  • The average price was $572
  • WordPress Responsive Table

    ❄️ The Algorhythm ranked 27th out of 32


    Overview of the Algorhythm’S Specs

    Check out the tables for the Algorhythm’s specs and available sizes.

    STYLE:

    ALL-MOUNTAIN

    PRICE: 

    $679 - BUYING OPTIONS

    Ability Level: 

    Ability Level Intermediate to Advanced

    flex:

    Snowboard Flex 6 and a half

    feel:

    Snowboard Feel Semi Locked In

    DAMPNESS:

    Chattery Damp Bar-07

    SMOOTH /SNAPPY: 

    Smooth Snappy Bar-04

    Playful /aggressive:

    Playful Aggressive Bar 6

    Edge-hold:

    edge hold firm to hard snow

    camber profile:

    Directional Hybrid Camber

    Directional Hybrid Camber

    Directional hybrid Camber - Rocker towards nose and tail, but more in the nose. 

    SHAPE: 

    DirectionaL TWIN

    setback stance:

    Setback 19mm (0.75")

    BASE: 

    SINTERED | Ride's "Sintered 4000 Ptex Base"

    weight:

    Felt a little HEAVIER than normal

    Sizing

    LENGTH (cm) 

    Waist Width (mm)

    Rec Rider Weight (lb)

    Rec Rider Weight (kg)

    147

    245

    75-165

    34-75

    151

    248

    100-180

    45-82

    154

    251

    115-195

    52-93

    157

    254

    125-205

    57-93

    161

    257

    130-210

    59-95

    155W

    258

    125-205

    57-93

    160W

    264

    160-220+

    73-100+

    164W

    266

    170-220+

    77-100+

    Who is the Algorhythm Most Suited To?

    The Algorhythm is best suited to someone looking for a versatile board to use as a one-board quiver, who is at least a solid intermediate rider and prefers to have a little more speed under them, rather than more casual cruising. And preferably someone who doesn't encounter slushy conditions all that often, based on my experience with it. 

    Not for beginners, IMO, and even lower-end intermediate riders are likely to struggle with it, even in more favorable conditions, I would say. 


    Algorhythm DetailS

    Ride Algorythm Snowboard Test 2025

    O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Algorhythm is capable of.

    Demo Info

    Board: Ride Algorhythm 2025, 157cm (254mm waist width)

    Date: March 23, 2024

    TESTING Conditions:

    Overhead: Raining. Some dry periods, but mostly light to moderate rain and getting heavy at times. 

    Visibility:

    °C °C +wind chill °F °F rounded °F +wind chill °F WC rounded °C | °F ° +wind chill
    Morning Temp: 4 3 39.2 39 37.4 37 4°C | 39°F 3°C | 37°F
    Afternoon Temp: 3 2 37.4 37 35.6 36 3°C | 37°F 2°C | 36°F
    cm inch in rounded cm inch
    24 hr snowfall: 0 0 0 0cm 0”
    48 hr snowfall: 0 0 0 0cm 0”
    7 day snowfall: 0 0 0 0cm 0”
    kph mph mph rounded kph mph
    Morning Wind: 10 6.2150 6 10kph 6mph
    Afternoon Wind: 15 9.3226 9 15kph 9mph
    WordPress Responsive Table

    On groomer: Slushfest! The occasional slightly firmer areas, but they were few and far between. For the most part just all slush. 

    Off groomer: Same as on groomer. The rain showed no mercy!

    Set Up

    Bindings angles: +15/-15
    mm in mm in
    Stance Width: 560 22.0472 22.05 560mm 22.05”
    Stance Setback: 20 0.7874 0.8 20mm 0.8”
    Width at Front Insert: 265.5 10.4528 10.5 265.5mm 10.5”
    Width at Back Insert: 267.5 10.5315 10.5 267.5mm 10.5”
    feet inches cm cm rounded
    Rider Height 6 0 183 6`0” 183cm
    pounds 81.6327 0
    Rider Weight 180 0 82 180lbs 82kgs
    Rider Boot Size: US9.5 (Adidas Response ADV)
    Bindings Used: Burton Malavita, size M
    grams pounds ounces lbs rounded oz rounded grams lbs & ozs
    Board Weight 3100 6.8342 0.8342 6 13 3100g/cm 6lbs 13ozs 13.3474
    Weight per CM 19.75 0.0435 0.0435 0 0.7 19.75g/cm 0.7ozs/cm 0.6966
    Average Weight per cm 18.64 0.0411 0.0411 0 0.66 18.64g/cm* 0.66ozs/cm 0.6575
    WordPress Responsive Table

    *based on a sample size of 300+ models that I’ve weighed in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 & 2025 models. 

    Powder

    None to be seen on the day, but the Algorhythm would almost certainly have preferred it over the slush. 

    Based on specs and experience with boards with similar specs, it should do well in powder, without being a high end powder board - but above average I would say.  Helping it to float the white fluffy stuff is a 20mm (3/4") setback and a directional camber profile with rocker before the contact points, and more of it at the nose end than tail end. 

    Carving

    This was the Algorhythm's best feature for me, on the day. The conditions weren't particularly well suited to carving but even in the conditions you could feel this was a good carving board. Would be good to get it out on a firmer day to rip some carves on it. 

    Turning

    Ease of Turning/Slashing: Turning in the kind of slush on the day isn't an easy prospect for any board, so it was a tough test for it, and may have been unfair testing conditions for it, but it failed miserably unfortunately. I had a torrid time with this board trying to do any kind of slashing or skidded type turns. No board feared well in this aspect today, but this was the worst of all of them. 

    Maneuverability at slow speeds: Also the least agile at slow speeds on the day. Again, it may have fared better on a firmer day, but it didn't like to take quick turns at slow speeds in sticky, slushy conditions, that's for sure.

    Catchiness: Was unfortunately a catch machine in the slush. Now, again, any board will become more prone to catch an edge/get an edge stuck in these types of conditions, but all other boards I rode on the day weren't having as much trouble with it as this did.

    Even when not turning it felt like it was trying to pull the base flat, when slightly on edge. If you didn't get a real high angle on the edge, it wanted to revert flat - a feeling I've had a few times with boards and one that I don't like. You never feel like you can just cruise - it's likely you're constantly having to fight the board - which is especially a nightmare on cat-tracks.  

    Strangely, it wasn't overly catchy in tail like a lot of catchier boards are, but it was more in the nose, which was weird. It did give me a good selection of clips for a bloopers edit! I was slung to the snow on a few occasions, when just cruising down. It just kept gripping that toe edge contact point on the nose and diving, catching, gripping and pulling me down, unexpectedly.

    Speed

    Was able to get a decent amount of speed going on the slush, versus other boards and felt pretty stable at speed too. Was definitely a better board with speed under it than it was when riding slower, particularly when you didn't have to turn too much. 

    Uneven Terrain

    Crud/Chunder: It felt pretty damp and stable, so generally, I would say it should be good for handling rutted out, bumpy, lumpy kinds of snow, but when the mess was of a slushy variety, it wasn't as confidence inspiring.

    Trees/Bumps: If you've read above how I found this board to turn sharply and at slower speeds, then you'll likely understand why I say that I didn't enjoy taking it into trees. In light fluffy powder, would be much better, I would say. Even in harder conditions would likely be better. 

    Jumps

    Wasn't the biggest fan. Again, the conditions weren't conducive to a thorough test, so it's likely better in firmer conditions, but with how poorly it performed in general, for me, in slush, it was never going to feel great for jumps. 

    Pop: Total pop was decent enough, but it wasn't super easy to extract it. 

    Approach: Wasn't able to trust it to make any adjustments on the approach, so it was a pick a line, point it, shoot it setup. Which it did pretty well at, as it did feel nice and stable, but lining up trickier approach side-hits felt sketchy. 

    Landing:  It had a solid feel, but again, any need to make quick speed checks or maneuvers after landing or if you didn't land quite straight and it wasn't the best. 

    Side-hits: Not a fan in the conditions. It didn't want to make quick maneuvers and trying to generate my own pop off them felt sketchy, like it could catch an edge at any second. 

    Switch

    Transitions were quite sketchy with that catchy feeling. And even when in that switch position that revert-to-flat-base feel I got from it was even more disconcerting riding in my weaker direction. 

    Spins

    Again, wasn't a fan because of that catchy/grippy feeling. Setups and landings both felt sketchy. Not the lightest of boards either. No danger of over-spinning after landing, but definitely didn't feel confident finishing an under-rotation after landing. 

    Jibbing

    Honestly, my jibbing isn't strong enough and I didn't feel safe taking this on any boxes/rails. But based on how the board felt in general, it's not going to be great, at least not in the conditions we had. 

    Butters

    Pressing tip and tail took some effort. Not super stiff in the tip/tail, but not super easy to press either. Buttering around wasn't great though, for reasons that have been explained above, but straight presses were ok once you lent some good weight into them. No danger of over-flexing, at least for me. 


    Score Breakdown and Final Verdict

    Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.

    Factor Rating (/5) weighting total score weighted rounded score
    Weighted
    Powder 3 15 9 9/15
    Carving 4 10 8 8/10
    Turns 3 10 6 6/10
    Speed 4 10 8 8/10
    Crud 3.5 10 7 7/10
    Trees 3 10 6 6/10
    Switch 3 10 6 6/10
    Jumps 3 10 6 6/10
    Spins 3 5 3 3/5
    Butters 3 5 3 3/5
    Rails 2.5 5 2.5 2.5/5
    TOTAL (after normalizing):83 77.7108 77.7 77.7/100
    WordPress Responsive Table

    As outlined at the start of this review and re-iterated throughout, this wasn't really a fair test for the Algorhythm and it may well perform a lot better in different conditions. But for slushy conditions, this would be one of the last boards I would reach for. The other boards I rode that day all had to deal with the same conditions and while it wasn't great conditions for any board, the others handled it noticeably better than the Algorhythm. 

    Which was disappointing as this is a board I've been wanting to test since it was first released. Will definitely look to get on it again in more variable conditions, but for now can only report how I found it in slush and it wasn't great. 


    More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online

    To learn more about the Algorhythm, or if you're ready to buy, or if you just want to research prices and availability, check out the links below:




    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at blauerboardshop.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2026 at backcountry.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at evo.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at steepandcheap.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    >>Ride Algorhythm 2026 at prfo.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at evo.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at blue-tomato.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at blauerboardshop.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2026 at backcountry.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at evo.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at steepandcheap.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Ride Algorhythm 2026 at prfo.com
    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at evo.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Ride Algorhythm 2025 at blue-tomato.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    Ride Algorhythm 2026

    To check out some other men's all-mountain snowboard options, or to see how the Algorhythm compares to others, check out our top rated all-mountain snowboards by clicking the button below.

    Our Top Rated Men's All-Mtn Snowboards
    Share 0
    Post 0
    Pin 0

    Category Links: 2025 Snowboard Reviews| 2026 Snowboard Reviews| Current Model| Men's All Mountain Snowboard Reviews| Ride Tags: Ride Algorhythm 2024-2025| Ride Algorhythm 2025-2026| Ride Algorhythm Review

    About Nate

    Nate is passionate about and loves learning new things everyday about snowboarding, particularly the technical aspects of snowboarding gear. That, and becoming a better rider and just enjoying and getting the most out of life.

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Footer

    Follow Snowboarding Profiles

    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Recent Comments

    • Nate on Jones Mercury FASE Bindings Review
    • Nate on Nidecker Escape Review
    • Nate on Lib Tech T Rice Golden Orca Review

    Snowboardingprofiles.com participates in affiliate programs and may earn commissions on products linked to on this site.  More Details

    Snowboardingprofiles.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

    Copyright © 2014–2026 · SnowboardingProfiles.com

    back-to-top
    • Home
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact