Hello and welcome to my K2 Thraxis review.
In this review I will take a look at the Thraxis as freeride snowboard boots.
As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Thraxis a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how they compare with other freeride boots.
Overall Rating
Boots: K2 Thraxis
Price: $479 (USD recommended retail)
Style: Freeride
Flex Rating: Stiff (10/10)
Flex Feel: Stiff (9/10)
Rating Score: 93.2/100
Compared to other Freeride Boots
Out of the 17 freeride boots that I rated:
Overview of the Thraxis’s Specs
Check out the tables for the Thraxis's specs.
Specs
Style: | Freeride or hard charging all-mountain |
Price: | $479 |
Ability Level: |  |
Flex: |  |
Weight: | A little heavier than normal |
Lacing System: | Triple Boa |
Who are the Thraxis Most Suited to?
The Thraxis are for anyone of an advanced level, looking for a stiff boot for bombing, carving and freeriding.
Especially suited to those who like boa - there are 3 of them after all! And need boots that help with heel hold.
Matches best to stiffer boards/bindings.
The Thraxis in More Detail
O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Thraxis are capable of.
Demo Info
Boots: K2 Thraxis 2020
Size: 10 (US Men's Sizing)
Date: February 14, 2020
Conditions: Hard packed. Definitely not icy though. Just nice.
Off groomer isn't ideal but certainly doable. Again firm, but not icy.
Sunny and perfect vis.
Supposed to be -4 and -10 with wind chill, but feels much warmer than that. Probably cause it's so sunny
Was fresh snow overnight but not obvious when actually riding. But still pretty darn good. Can't complain
Bindings angles: +15/-15
Board Demoed With: Rossignol One LF 2018
Bindings Demoed With: Burton Malavita
Outersole Length: 31.2cm (mondo 28cm)
Difference between Mondo & Outersole: 3.2cm
Backstay Height: 27.5cm
Weight: 1140 grams*
* Average of a sample of boots I weighed was 1006 grams, so a decent bit heavier than the average, but pretty close to average. Heaviest were 1320 grams and lightest were 740 grams. Stiffer boots tend to be heavier, so for their flex, they are normal.
Flex
Not quite as stiff as the Ride Insano or Burton Driver X that I rode the same day, but still quite stiff. One of the stiffer boots I've ridden still, but just a notch down from those 2.
Fit
Width: Medium width. Not particularly wide, but not overly narrow either.
True to Size?: I usually ride a 10, and these felt really good in the 10. So, I would say true to size.
High or Low Arch: Snug on the top of my feet like they should be, but not painful, so I'd say medium in terms of arch. My right foot has more arch than my left, which is quite flat, so this is going off my right foot.
Responsiveness
Really nice in terms of bombing and getting that quick turning at speed. And in terms of being able to hold carves nice and deep and long. Made my board more carvy than it otherwise is.
What I really liked is that it felt like I had to put in less energy to get that energy out of them vs other boots with a similar feeling for carves. And a little more maneuverable at slower speeds than other boots with a similar flex.
Heel Hold
Really good in terms of heel hold. I had very minimal heel lift, and only noticed it when I was really trying to notice it.
Having that third boa that cranks on the liner around the ankle also meant that you could very easily crank down on the ankle if you felt like the heel was starting to lift a little more after riding for a while.
Adjustability
Really good adjustability on these boots. There are two boas that work on the shell of the boot. One controls the upper section and the other the lower section. So you can tighten those areas differently.
Then there's a third boa that cranks down on the ankle around the liner of the boot. Because that is controlled from a boa coil on the outer boot, it's super easy to adjust that on the fly, without having to open your boot right out, which I really like.
Let’s Break up this text with a Video
Comfort
Nice comfortable feeling, plush liner. And overall very comfortable.
At first I had pressure on my inner ankles. But that pressure was greatly lessened from heat molding and then even more so just with a walk from the car park to the lift. By the time I started riding, it was barely noticeable and after a couple of runs was all but non-existent. So, just something that took a bit of breaking in, as is often the case with any boot, but particularly with stiffer boots.
No cramping at all, which is one of the biggest things I look out for in boots.
Shock Absorption
Decent shock absorption for flat landings and absorbed chatter pretty well too.
Board Feel
They have quite a rigid firm sole and a good tread depth. Nice for traction but not so much for board feel. And stiffer boots tend to be not as good either. All that said, they weren't terrible in the board feel department, but also not amazing. A little better vs the Ride Insano. About the same as the Driver X.
Traction
Sole is really high quality, firm and good tread depth. Felt good walking in them. Didn't have anything too technical or icy to walk in - just the car park and up to the lift, but from sole inspection, I imagine they would have great traction.
Reduced Footprint
They aren't super bulky, but definitely not low profile either. A little longer on the outersole vs mondo than the average.
Entry/Exit
Easy enough to get foot in and out - and easy to work with the boas. A little longer than something like a single boa, naturally but still fairly fast.
Apart from the 3 boas, there's also a velcro strap that tightens around the top part of the liner. This is another little step, but doesn't take long and gives a nice secure feeling around the shins.
Score Breakdown and Final Verdict
Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
RESPONSE | 5.0 | 35/35 |
TRACTION | 4.5 | 13.5/15 |
HEEL HOLD | 4.5 | 9/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.5 | 9/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 4.0 | 8/10 |
REDUCED FOOTPRINT | 3.0 | 6/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 93.2/100 |
The Thraxis are my personal favorite freeride boots. Nice and stiff and responsive, but with just enough feel for them and without having to put too much energy into them vs other stiffer boots.
And I really like the triple boa system on them - and just all round comfortable with great heel hold and no real weaknesses at all, but with a lot of strong points.
Just really nice boots to ride in that give nice spring, energy and power.
More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online
If you’re interested in learning more about the Thraxis, are ready to buy or want to research current prices and sizing availability, check out the links below.
- CANADA
- UK/EUROPE
If you want to see how the Thraxis compared to other freeride, or want to check out some other options, check out the link below.
I love these boots and it’s time to replace them. This is my second pair – I get about two seasons before they’re too soft and packed out. No complaints though! Every other boot I’ve used has been a floppy noodle after one season.
Have you been able to compare the 2022 Thraxis with the previous version? Definitely looks like they made some changes…
It’s the only boot for me, so I’m hoping the shape hasn’t changed on the newer version.
Hi AK
Thanks for your message.
I don’t see any major changes between the 2021 and 2022 models and even the 2020 looks to be pretty similar based on paper. I haven’t tested the 2022 model (harder for me to test boots as I have to buy them, test them and on sell them, so I only re-test if there have been major changes). But on paper they look very similar. I think the biggest change, from the looks of it, from the 2020 to 2021 model (and also on the 2022 model) is that it got the H4 Boa, but that shouldn’t change the performance of the boot – it just makes it harder to break the BOA cables or coiler (i.e. the coiler is designed to pop off on hard impact).
From a specs perspective everything else looks to be the same. From a visual look at them, the sole looks a little different, but I think that’s mostly aesthetic. But of course, if there are other changes that I’m missing, I’m more than happy to be informed. But from what I can tell, they’re not too different.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate,
Found a 2020 model with the H3 Boa for about $70 less than the current year with H4 Boa.
Since the season is over, and you have tested more boots since this review/last reply…
Wanted to ask, in your experience and opinion, if H4 Boas are “better”/bring enough improvement to the table to justify the price difference?
Thanks!
Appreciate all the reviews you do!
Hey Frank
Thanks for your message.
The biggest difference with the H4 Boa is that it pops off when there’s enough force. So, instead of breaking it just pops off – and then you can re-install and carry on. In terms of actual improvement to how the BOA works outside of that I haven’t noticed any difference. I think the biggest complaint people have with BOA is how hard it is to repair if it breaks – so, from my perspective, the idea of developing the H4 is to remove this weakness. Personally I’ve had a really good run with BOA and haven’t broken one yet, but I have heard of people who have – so that’s the biggest advantage of the H4 from what I can tell – they don’t feel smoother or faster or anything like that compared to the H3 – at least not from what I could tell.
Hope this helps
Hi, I read a few of you K2 boot reviews and the sizing thing always comes up. My current Burton Ions are shot and I am considering Thraxis as a replacement. My Ions are a size 10 and fit perfect, toes just brushing, super comfy. This has been the case for any other burton boots I’ve had. So, size 9.5 in the Thraxis?
Thanks.
Hi JP-OH
Thanks for your message.
K2 boots are tough for me. I feel like the 10 is the perfect fit, as it was for the Thraxis, when I tested them. But I’ve also ridden 9.5s which have felt tight to start but have packed out well to a point I think they would be the better option long term. It’s really hard to say, because the Thraxis felt so good in the 10 for me. But other K2 boots have started to feel a little too big in the 10 after heat molding and riding for a while (e.g. K2 Ender). I rode the K2 Darko in the 9.5 and that felt like it was too tight to start, but started to feel good by the time I’d done a couple of laps and after heat molding.
Note that I didn’t heat mold the Thraxis before riding. I typically do, depending on the initial fit. The initial fit with the Thraxis was so good that I didn’t feel the need to heat mold. And also I’d ridden the Ender not long before and had heat molded that and felt they were starting to pack out a bit too much by the end of the testing.
My instinct is that if you’re a 10 in Burton, then probably a 9.5 in K2. For something like the Thraxis, it will take longer to mold to your feet (being stiffer), but I think in the long run, it’s probably going to be the better fit. I would heat mold if you go with the 9.5 though, to speed up that break in process.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
Thank you for pointing out the bevel edge as it affect toe drag more than you would think. I also find a few bindings having to big of a pad these day so that the bindingpad actually drags.
Anyhow, I have a question I would appreciate your input on. My feet are 28,3 and 28,5 cm long. I have been riding mondo 29cm (US 11), but want to see if it is possible to squeeze myself into a pair of Mondo 28,5cm. I see that you normally ride 0,5cm Mondo more than your feet. Do you think it’s doable? I can live with some temporarily pain hoping they would pack out.
Ride or K2 would probably be the brand as Adidas and Burton don’t fit my feet very well. I am in the toedrag club so going down half a size would greatly improve on drag. Due to Covid there is not a lot of K2 / Ride boots to try on in the shops so I would have to order from an international webshop, which makes return quite a hassle.
Hi Boarddude
Thanks for your message.
I find I can squeeze into a 9.5 K2. It’s tight, but it does work and not to a point of being painful and gets better as I ride. I would probably go 9.5 if I was to buy K2 boots. 10s work well for me for testing, because I’m not riding them for that long, but if I was to buy K2, I’d go 9.5. I don’t think I’d say the same for Ride. I feel 10 is right for me there, but I haven’t tried a 9.5, so it could be possible. Note though that my longest foot is 27.3cm. So I sometimes get into a mondo 27.5 (K2, Salomon, Adidas) but there is a couple of mm difference, with you at the 28.5cm trying to get into a 28.5. It’s certainly what they’re designed to do, so I don’t think it’s undoable. In my experience with those brands I can do it (allbeit 2mm off the mondo). If you were to try I would go K2 rather than Ride though.
Hope this helps
I am very confused of the length measurements.
You use Burton 10.5 US and K2 10 US in all reviews (so they are comparable regardless of the number on the label).
Why does Burton have an good footprint reduction (4points) while k2 only 3 points?
In your trials; Burton imperial outersole 31.1
K2 maysis outersole 31.2
Is a millimeter worth a point?
Hi J.p
Thanks for your message.
I would ride Burton 10s, if I was to buy them. I rode the 10.5s for testing, which was fine, but the 10.5s would pack out too much over time for me and end up being too big. For testing I’m not in them long enough for them to pack out that much. The Footprint reduction scores take into account the difference between mondo and outersole. I do agree that 1mm wouldn’t be worth even half a point, but it’s technically 6mm difference size-for-size. Also, it’s worth noting that Burton boots have a lot more toe bevel on their boots than every other boot I’ve measured/tested, which allows for a greater angle before boot drag occurs. Hope that makes sense.