Hello and welcome to my Burton Kilroy Twin review.
In this review, I will take a look at the Kilroy Twin as a freestyle snowboard.
As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Kilroy Twin a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how it compares with other freestyle snowboards.
Overall Rating
Board: Burton Kilroy Twin 2021
Price: $399
Style: Freestyle
Flex Rating: Medium-Soft
Flex Feel on Snow: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Rating Score: 85.2/100
Compared to other Men’s Freestyle Boards
Out of the 37 men’s freestyle snowboards that I rated:
Overview of the Kilroy Twin’s Specs
Check out the tables for the Kilroy Twin’s specs and available sizes.
Specs
Style: | Freestyle |
Price: | $399 |
Ability Level: |  |
Flex: |  |
Feel: |  |
Turn Initiation: | Fast |
Edge-hold: |  |
Camber Profile: | |
Shape: | |
Setback Stance: | Centered |
Base: | Sintered |
Weight: | Feels a little lighter than normal |
Sizing
LENGTH (cm) | Waist Width (mm) | Rec Rider Weight (lb) | Rec Rider Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
148 | 248 | 100-150 | 45-68 |
152 | 250 | 120-180 | 54-82 |
155 | 252 | 120-180 | 54-82 |
159 | 255 | 150-200 | 68-91 |
Who is the Kilroy Twin Suited To?
The Kilroy Twin is a great option for anyone looking for a predominantly park board, that also works well doing freestyle things over the rest of the mountain. Particularly those who are looking for something full camber, but want something softer flexing.
Not for a beginner, but fine for low intermediate and up, IMO.
The Kilroy Twin in More Detail
O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Kilroy Twin is capable of.
Demo Info
Board: Burton Kilroy Twin 2021, 152cm (250mm waist width)
Date: March 7, 2020
Conditions: Cloudy but still around 90-95% visibility.
Groomers had a decent layer of soft with mostly a medium firmness under that layer, with some harder spots in patches.
Off groomer soft with some overnight fresh. Not waist deep or anything, but a nice amount.
Wind around 10-15kph (6-9mph). Temperature was -8°C (17.6°F) and with wind chill -11°C (12.2°F).
Bindings angles: +15/-15
Stance width: 560mm (22″) - rode it 1" wider than reference
Stance Setback: Centered
Width at Inserts: 262mm (10.31") - likely around 260mm (10.24") at reference stance
Rider Height: 6'0"
Rider Weight: 175lbs
Rider Boot Size: US10 Salomon Lo-Fi
Bindings Used: Burton Malavita M
Rough Weight: Felt a little lighter than normal - but 152 is also shorter than I'd normally ride, even for a park board.
Powder
Not designed for powder but for brief moments in not-too-deep powder, it was OK, like most boards are, though I did nose dive and get stuck once. Would definitely be a back leg burner in deep pow for extended periods of time.
True twin, centered and full camber doesn't scream easy powder float.
Carving & Turning
Carving: Good for how short and soft flexing this board felt. That full camber profile helps there for sure. Good, but still not a hard carver or anything. But fun for shorter/sharper carves, vs long arcing ones.
Turning: Easy board to turn and a very snappy feeling turn.
Maneuverability at Slow Speeds: Really nimble. Partly that's down to it's size - it was short compared to what I'd normally ride - but add length to it and it was still going to feel quite nimble.
Skidded Turns: Good for skidding turns for a camber board. But always going to be not ideal, with a full camber profile profile, but definitely can skid your turns on it.
Speed
Definitely not a bomber, but surprisingly good for it's flex and the size I rode.
Uneven Terrain
Easy going over bumps and nice and snappy and nimble weaving between.
Good enough in crud. Doesn't crush through it but goes over top OK.
Let's Break this Text Up with a Video
Jumps
Good fun for jumps - side hits in particular.
Pop: Good pop and excessively easy to access. Fun board for easy pop
Approach: Bit wobbly for approaches to larger jumps, but stable enough for other sizes, where you didn't need as much speed.
Landing: Pretty solid considering it was a 152.
Side-hits: Super fun for side hits - really nimble and good easy pop.
Small jumps/Big Jumps: Best suited to small to medium jumps in my opinion vs larger jumps.
Switch
Great for switch as expected.
Spins
Really easy to get the spin around (size helped, but would still be easy at a longer length, IMO), great for setups and landings, whether switch or otherwise and really good pop. Overall a really fun board to spin with - not as suitable for larger tricks though.
Jibbing
Not the biggest fan of all-camber for jibs, but I felt confident hitting jibs on this board, and I'm definitely not the strongest jibber in the world.
Butters
Really easy to butter. More so than I remember the Kilroy Process being, even though they look like basically the same board. The smaller size definitely helps there, but had it felt like that in a 155, I would have given it 4.5, so the 4/5 (and every other score here) is adjusted for length.
Score Breakdown and Final Verdict
Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
|---|---|---|
JUMPS | 4.5 | 18/20 |
JIBBING | 3.5 | 14/20 |
SWITCH | 4.5 | 13.5/15 |
BUTTERING | 4.0 | 8/10 |
SPINS | 4.5 | 9/10 |
UNEVEN TERRAIN | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
POWDER | 2.0 | 2/5 |
CARVING/TURNS | 3.0 | 3/5 |
SPEED | 3.0 | 3/5 |
PIPE | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 85.2/100 |
The Kilroy Twin is a snappy, energetic park board, that has easy pop and a lively feel. It's got more for carving and can handle speed better than you would think (though still not a bomber), and just has a great feeling on a turn or short carve.
But mostly this board kills it in the park and for sidehits. In the park it was better on jibs than I expected and was just about ideal for small and medium jumps. Not as suitable for larger jumps though, IMO.
More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online
If you want to learn more about the Kilroy Twin, or if you are ready to buy, or if you just want to research prices and availability, check out the links below.
If you want to check out some other freestyle snowboard options, or if you want to compare how the Kilroy Twin compares to other freestyle snowboards, then check out the next link.
Hi Nate
Enjoying your reviews and thought I ask you for an advise – as unfortunately I don’t have access to a lot of boards 🙂
I’m boarding for about 30 years . I ride a Stone Message (traditional camber) for harder snow, and a Proto Type 2 for softer conditions. I’m looking for a replacement / upgrade for my Proto Type 2, because I really miss the pop I get from the Stone Message.
What would you say, ist this a board something to look at if I’m searching for a good carver with pop for softer conditions. I’m never in the park and do not hit big jumps (too old 😉 but enjoy regular and switch carving, some 180ies over small bumps and buttering / playing around on the groomers.
I would really appreciate your advice – thanks.
Hi Rico
Thanks for your message.
This board is a good carver for its flex, but it’s still not a hard carver. Good for carves at slower speeds, but when really getting up to speed it’s not as good. Good pop and really easy pop too (don’t have to wind it up too much to extract it). So depending on how hard you wanted to carve, it could definitely work for what you’re describing. If you wanted a little more for carving and a little more pop, then I would look at the Paramount.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate
Thank you very much for your reply. Will take look at the Paramount as well.
– Rico
You’re very welcome Rico. Curious to know what you go with. If you think of it at the time, let me know what you go with and how you get on, once you get it on snow. Happy riding!
Hi Nate
I got my new board at the beginning of this week – and no, it is not a Burton but a GNU Antigravity. Might be a bit of a surprise, but let me explain.
The Paramount looked really interesting, but I just couldn’t get it at a good price. So I decided to open up my search parameters a bit and checked what I could get for around 300$ (which is really cheap here in Switzerland).
This is how I settled on the Antigravity – and I love it so far. We already have spring conditions and the edge hold in the morning is surprisingly good for its flex (which for me feels around 5). I can carve it hard and it handles uneven terrain pretty well. So all in all this is a really great board for the price. I miss a bit of butterabilty, and riding switch is obviously not as easy as with the Never Summer PT2.
So your recommendation had an influence – I went for a board that carves great and I enjoy it 🙂
Thanks again!
Hi Rico
Thanks for the update and your feedback on the Antigravity. Really appreciate it, and glad you’re enjoying it and were able to find it for a great price!