The Jones Mountain Twin Pro felt to me like a stable, damp all-mountain board that carves well, handles crud with ease and stomps large jumps like its a walk in the park. It suits stronger, more aggressive riders.
In this review, I will take a look at the Mountain Twin Pro as an aggressive all-mountain snowboard.
As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Mountain Twin Pro a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how it compares with other aggressive all-mtn snowboard snowboards.
Overall Rating
Board: Jones Mountain Twin Pro 2026
Price: $699
Style: Aggressive All-Mountain
Flex Rating: Mid-stiff (4/5)
Flex Feel on Snow: Mid-Stiff (7.5/10)
Rating Score: 88.1/100
Compared to other Men’s Aggressive All-Mountain Boards
Of the 19 current model aggressive all-mtn snowboards that we tested:
❄️ The Mountain Twin Pro ranked 7th out of 19
Overview of the Mountain Twin Pro’S Specs
Check out the tables for the Mountain Twin Pro’s specs and available sizes.
STYLE:
aggressive all-mtn
PRICE:
$699 - BUYING OPTIONS
Ability Level:

flex:

feel:

DAMPNESS:

SMOOTH /SNAPPY:

Playful /aggressive:

Edge-hold:

camber profile:
HYBRID CAMBER
Hybrid CAMBer - Jones' "Camrock"
SHAPE:
setback stance:
Centered
BASE:
Sintered- Jones' "Recycled Sintered 9900 Base"
weight:
FELT Normal
Camber Height:
6mm
Sizing
LENGTH (cm) | Waist Width (mm) | Rec Rider Weight (lb) | Rec Rider Weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
154 | 251 | 120-170 | 54-77 |
156W | 259 | 130-180 | 59-82 |
157 | 254 | 130-180 | 59-82 |
159W | 261 | 140-190 | 64-86 |
160 | 257 | 150-200 | 67-91 |
162W | 263 | 150-200 | 67-91 |
163 | 260 | 160-210 | 73-95 |
165W | 267 | 170-220+ | 77-100+ |
* weight recommendations are according to the manufacturer
Who is the Mountain Twin Pro Most Suited To?
The Jones Mountain Twin Pro is best suited to more assertive riders who want a stiffer, damper, more stable all-mountain board that can handle speed, carving and rough snow well. It’s not something I’d recommend for riders who want an easy-going, playful, low-effort ride, but for someone who likes to ride with intent, it has a lot to offer.
It could work well as a one-board quiver for a strong intermediate to advanced rider who wants something that can carve confidently, charge through crud, feel solid on bigger jumps and handle a bit of everything around the mountain.
As a quiver addition, it would pair well with a softer freestyle/park board, a more mellow daily driver or a more powder-specific board. Not ideal for beginners, jib-focused riders or those who spend a lot of time riding slowly in tight terrain.
TEST/REVIEW DetailS FOR THE Mountain Twin Pro

O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Mountain Twin Pro is capable of.
Demo Info
Board: Jones Mountain Twin Pro 2026, 157cm (254mm waist width)
Date: February 19, 2025
First Impressions
When I first got the Jones Mountain Twin Pro Snowboard on snow, it didn’t exactly blow me away right out of the gate. The first few slow speed turns felt a little sluggish.
But once I got a bit of speed under it, things changed quite a bit. It came alive more, felt smoother, and started to make a lot more sense. And it didn’t require bucket loads of speed, just a little more momentum under it.
Carving
This was one of the stronger areas for me.
Once I had some speed, I found the Mountain Twin Pro to be a really solid carver. It felt stable and confidence-inspiring. I could lean pretty deep into carves and it felt like it held on without wanting to wash out.
What stood out most was how it handled carving through less-than-ideal snow. In cruddy conditions, it felt noticeably composed and didn’t get knocked around easily, so I could maintain a clean line.
Overall, I’d say carving was at least a 4/5, maybe even pushing 4.5 when conditions got rough.
Turning
Ease of Turning/Slashing:
It wasn’t the easiest board to initiate turns on. I definitely had to put more effort into it, especially at slower speeds.
At times, it felt like there was a bit more consequence if I got lazy with technique. Not ultra-demanding, but it wasn’t something I could just casually throw around either.
Maneuverability at slow speeds:
This was one of its weaker points (but given its consistency across factors, still not that bad). It felt a bit slow and slightly heavy when riding at lower speeds. Tight turns and quick adjustments took more effort than ideal.
That said, it did improve a bit as I got used to it - and it was only really at the very slow speeds that it was a little slow turning - as long as I had some speed, it became much better.
Catchiness:
There was a little bit of catch in there but, again, mostly noticeable at slower speeds. Nothing major, but definitely not fully catch-free. Once I picked up even just a little bit of speed, that feeling mostly disappeared.
Speed
I didn’t get perfect conditions to fully open it up, but I could tell this board liked speed.
It felt stable and composed, and the dampness helped smooth things out. Even when the snow was a bit sticky and inconsistent, the board didn’t feel overly nervous.
It wasn’t lightning fast in those conditions, but that seemed more about the snow than the base. Based on previous experience with the same base on this board and other Jones boards, it tends to be better than most for glide.
Uneven Terrain
Crud/Chunder:
This was a standout. The Mountain Twin Pro felt really good in crud. It was noticeably more stable and damper than my control board and the Frontier 2.0 and Rally Cat, which I also tested on the day. It just smashed through uneven snow without barely even flinching.
If you ride in chopped-up conditions a lot, this is definitely a strength of this board.
Trees/Bumps:
It was decent, but took effort. Because of the stiffness and slightly heavier feel, it wasn’t super quick edge-to-edge in tight terrain. I had to work a bit harder to maneuver it through bumps and trees.
That said, once I stayed on top of it and kept my input strong, it handled things pretty well. Just not effortless.
Powder
I didn’t get a ton of proper powder time, but from what I did experience, it felt decent enough.
There’s enough there to keep you floating reasonably well, but nothing that stands out as exceptional. But perfectly fine for shallow powder and in deeper powder would survive but likely be a bag leg workout.
Jumps
Overall:
This board felt real good on jumps, especially when going a bit bigger.
Pop:
The pop was decent overall. Total pop was good - around a 4/5, I’d say - but it wasn’t the easiest to access. I had to put in some effort to load it up properly.
So, while it had the power there, it wasn’t effortless.
Approach:
Really solid. It felt stable and confidence-inspiring on approach. Not the most adjustable mid-line, but still good enough to make minor corrections.
Landing:
It felt stable and reliable on landings, especially when coming in with decent speed. It handled uneven landings well too.
Side Hits
It was okay here, but not amazing.
It didn’t feel as easy or playful as boards that are more geared toward quick pop and slashy riding. I could still hit side features, but it took more effort to get the same level of fun.
Switch
Riding switch was decent but not effortless.
Transitions weren’t super catchy, but I did have to concentrate a bit more than on more forgiving boards. It didn’t feel completely natural, but it was still very doable.
Spins
Spins were solid, but not a standout.
I found it a bit harder to get the board around, especially on slower takeoffs. There was also a slight sketchiness on takeoff and landing, when riding slower. A bit more speed and, like most things with this board, it felt a lot better and more at home.
Jibbing
Not really its thing.
I could take it through the jib line, but I didn’t enjoy it much. It felt a bit too stiff and not playful enough for presses and rail work.
More advanced rail riders might get more out of it, but for me, it wasn’t a board I’d choose for jibbing.
Butters
Buttering was doable, but not easy.
The tips and tails took some effort to press, which is expected given the stiffness. Once I got them engaged, they held nicely and felt fairly balanced - but it definitely required more input than I prefer. But maybe I’m just lazy!
Overall Feel
The overall feel sat somewhere between stable and semi-locked-in and it felt nice and damp. I’d put the dampness around a 7/10 - it did a good job absorbing chatter and smoothing things out.
It wasn’t ultra-snappy, but there was some snap there if I really loaded it up. And overall, it leaned more aggressive than playful. Not extreme, but definitely something that rewarded a more assertive riding style.
Score Breakdown and Final Verdict
Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.
| FACTOR | Rating (/5) | Weighted |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 4 | 16/20 |
| Carving | 4 | 16/20 |
| Turns | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
| Jumps | 4 | 12/15 |
| Powder | 3 | 6/10 |
| Crud | 4.5 | 9/10 |
| Trees | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
| Switch | 4 | 8/10 |
| Spins | 3.5 | 3.5/5 |
| TOTAL (after normalizing): | 88.1/100 |
The Mountain Twin Pro took some effort to turn, butter, and maneuver at slower speeds. But in return, it provided good stability, carving performance, and handled chop really well.
For me, it felt like a board that really came into its own when ridden with intent - especially at moderate to higher speeds.
If I wanted something playful and easy going, I’d look elsewhere. But for something that can charge a bit harder, carve better, and handle rough snow confidently and hit large jumps with confidence, the Mountain Twin Pro is a great tool for the job.
More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online
To learn more about the Mountain Twin Pro, or if you're ready to buy, or if you just want to research prices and availability, check out the links below.

To check out some other aggressive all-mtn snowboard options, or to see how the Mountain Twin Pro compares to others, check out our top rated aggressive all-mtn snowboards by clicking the button below.

Leave a Reply