This is a list of what i consider to be the best intermediate snowboards for women for the 2019-20 season.
These boards are chosen for being easy enough to ride for a high-end beginner/low end intermediate rider - but have just that little bit more performance than a typical beginner board to take you through to a more advanced level.
Each board is given a rating out of 100 for easier comparison.
Price has not been considered in the ratings.
Of the 32 different boards that I rated:
O.k. let’s get into the top 10.
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #10
Board: Arbor Poparazzi Rocker
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain-Freestyle
Smart rating score: 88.3/100
Starting off the list in #10 is the Arbor Poparazzi Rocker.
A great option for a full on beginner as well, but also works as an intermediate board that can take you into a more advanced stage of riding - but with a freestyle flavor. So, if you see yourself moving more into freestyle but want a deck that will still holds it's own over the rest of the mountain, this could be a good choice for you.
Check out the video for more about the Poparazzi Rocker
Score Breakdown for the Poparazzi
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 5.0/5 | 20/20 |
Versatility | 4.0/5 | 8/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 75.8/100 | 37.9/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 88.3/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #9
Board: Lib Tech Glider
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: Freestyle
Smart rating score: 89.1/100
Next up we have the Lib Tech Glider.
New from Lib Tech for 2020 (their whole women's line is new - previously they had a handful of their boards in narrow sizes but no specific women's line), the Glider is a great board for those who are just past that very beginner stage and looking to progress.
An even better option for those looking to get into riding freestyle in the future or who are already getting started in that direction.
Check out the video for more about the Glider
Score Breakdown for the Glider
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Versatility | 3.0/5 | 6/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 85.2/100 | 42.6/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 89.1/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #8
Board: YES Emoticon
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain-Freestyle
Smart rating score: 89.2/100
The Emoticon is one of those boards that anyone from beginner to expert can ride. For the more advanced rider it takes on more of a freestyle focus. But as an beginner to intermediate rider is also a great board for progressing your everyday riding on.
Also a great option for those that see hard/icy conditions often.
Check out the video for more about the Emoticon
Score Breakdown for the Emoticon
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Versatility | 4/5 | 8/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 81.5/100 | 40.8/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 89.2/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #7
Board: Endeavor Ranger
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: Freestyle
Smart rating score: 90.0/100
At #7 we have the Endeavor Ranger.
The Ranger is a Unisex board that comes in a wide range of sizes for both men and women.
It's another freestyle oriented board, perfect for those just looking to progress their skills, looking to get into the park or have an eye on freestyle riding in the future.
Check out the video for more about the Ranger
Score Breakdown for the Ranger
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Versatility | 3/5 | 6/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 83.0/100 | 41.5/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 90.0/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #6
Board: Capita Space Metal Fantasy
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: Freestyle
Smart rating score: 90.0/100
The very freestyle focused Space Metal Fantasy is great for anyone who mostly rides freestyle. Or as a second board for someone who has another board for their other riding, but wants a board to start out on or progress on in the park.
Check out the video for more about the Space Metal Fantasy
Score Breakdown for the Space Metal Fantasy
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Versatility | 3/5 | 6/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 83.0/100 | 41.5/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 90.0/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #5
Board: Salomon Rumble Fish
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium (5/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain-Freestyle
Smart rating score: 91.6/100
The Rumblefish is more on the all-mountain end of all-mountain freestyle. It's centered and a twin, but has more of an all-mountain feel to it. Great if you like to ride a lot of switch on the groomers or in powder, and like to throw in some freestyle here and there. Or just for simply progressing with your general riding to take it to the next level.
Check out the video for more about the Rumblefish
Score Breakdown for the Rumblefish
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Turning Ease | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Versatility | 4/5 | 8/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 86.0/100 | 43/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.6/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #4
Board: Never Summer Infinity
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium-Soft (4/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain
Smart rating score: 91.7/100
In at #4 we have Never Summer's Infinity, which is one of the most versatile on this list.
If you've already developed an eclectic style of riding that takes you anyway, doing a variety of things, or if you're still unsure of the type of riding you prefer - or if you simply want a board that will help you to progress your riding, the Infinity fits many scenarios.
Check out the video for more about the Infinity
Score Breakdown for the Infinity
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Turning Ease | 4.5/5 | 18/20 |
Versatility | 5/5 | 10/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 82.3/100 | 41.2/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 91.7/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #3
Board: Rossignol Frenemy
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium (5/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain
Smart rating score: 92.1/100
Another all-mountain option, but one that's a little stiffer and a little more stable feeling, is the Rossignol Frenemy. But just as versatile.
This is also a great option for those who ride hard/icy conditions often.
Check out the video for more about the Frenemy
This video is a couple of years old now, but the Frenemy hasn't really changed over the years, so it's all still relevant
Score Breakdown for the Frenemy
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Turning Ease | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Versatility | 5/5 | 10/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 82.9/100 | 41.5/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 92.1/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #2
Board: Burton Feelgood Flying V
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium (5/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain
Smart rating score: 93.7/100.
In at #2 and the last of 3 all-mountain options for this list, is Burton's Feelgood Flying V.
If you like the idea of a playful, freer/looser feeling ride, but still want the versatility of an all-mountain board, then the Feelgood Flying V might be the right choice for you.
Check out the video for more about the Feelgood Flying V
Score Breakdown for the Feelgood Flying V
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Turning Ease | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Versatility | 5/5 | 10/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 86.0/100 | 43/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 93.7/100 |
WOMEN'S INTERMEDIATE BOARD #1
Board: Capita Paradise
Price: View More Info and Current Prices Here
Flex: Medium (5/10)
Style of Board: All-Mountain-Freestyle
Smart rating score: 93.7/100
Finally, in at number 1, we have the Capita Paradise. Probably the most versatile twin going around, if you like to ride over the whole mountain, but prefer to be centered on a twin board and would like the option to get freestyle on it, from time to time, then the Paradise is a great option.
Or if you simply like to cruise the groomers and just want to get your riding smoother and progress to a more advanced level, then it's also a great option for that.
Check out the video for more about the Paradise
Score Breakdown for the Paradise
FACTOR | rating | contribution to final score |
|---|---|---|
Flex | 5/5 | 20/20 |
Turning Ease | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Versatility | 5/5 | 10/10 |
Performance Score as ALL-MOUNTAIN snowboard | 86.0/100 | 43/50 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 93.7/100 |
Over To You
So that's my list of the best intermediate snowboards for women for the 2019-20 season.
The scores above have been derived taking 3 factors that I see as important to a beginner friendly board, and giving 50% of the score to that. The other 50% of the score goes to how well that board performs in it's given category (i.e. all-mountain, freestyle etc).
Check out the links under each board for more info, prices and availability.
Hi-
This is sooooo helpful! If you have time, I would value your advice!
I get a lot of pain in my foot (plantar faciatis) and I am convinced tight bindings make it way worse. I was thinking upgrading to the Burton step ins would help and thought, why not a new board too! I am a solid intermediate rider (been riding for about 30 years, but only a few times a year). I usually really enjoy blue and blue black and a few black diamonds. I prefer control to speed. I like to do small jumps and occasionally ride a rail, but am definitely an all mountain rider. I want to be able to go either direction but am goofy. I love the feel of riding in powder- the floating sensation, but I also really like control. Anxiety makes cat tracks not my favorite, so the control helps there. I am not fast, I am zen riding the mountain. I will never be fast. I don’t want to be fast. I want to ride a mountain and enjoy life. I would love suggestions for the right board, and your opinion on the step in bindings. My “local” spot is Mammoth, but I have a trip to Switzerland (Zermatt) planned for my 50th later this month.:) Thanks so much! Also I am 5 foot 3 and about 135 lbs. I am also teaching my kid, he’s only 7 so I got him a used Burton, but soon!:) I have a Ride board right now, can’t remember the model and no complaints, but I’m not a complainer…
Hi Faye
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t tried the Step-Ons, so I can’t be much help there. I would say that something softer flexing, without being too soft would be the way to go – and that would also suit how you describe your riding. I would say around 4/5 or 5/5 in terms of flex. So, if you were to go Step-On, then I would say either the Limelight Step-On boot or the Ritual LTD Step-On, depending on budget.
For the board, based on what you’re describing, I think the Never Summer Infinity would be ideal. That’s the first board that came to mind, and weighing up the options, I’m even more leaning towards it. It’s something that’s a really easy going ride, but will give you some decent float in powder – without being too directional, so still easy to ride switch on. I think it’s a really good combination of everything you’re describing. The Rossignol Frenemy and Burton Feelgood Flying V (but definitely the Flying V version for you, not the camber version) would be my next choices.
Size-wise, I would say around 144-146 would be a good range to look at. But since you’ve been riding as long as you have, what you’re used to riding should also be taken into account. If you’re used to riding significantly longer or significantly shorter than that, we can revise that range.
So for those 3 options, I would say:
Infinity: 145 – you could definitely ride the 147 too, and if you’re used to something longer, then that might be the better bet
Frenemy: 147 or 144
Feelgood Flying V: 146
Hope this helps with your decision
Hi Nate, I am after a new board to get some fun back in my 1 or 2 weeks a year on the European snow. I used to love my GNU b nice but wanted a bit more stability and better carving, got a 2016 Jones Twin Sister and found it stable but underwhelming, bit heavy to Ollie and mess about on the edge of piste or in trees, I miss the fun, but don’t go in parks, only accessible powder, small kickers.
I’m wondering if the Jones Dream catcher might bring the fun of buttering and pottering about, also interested in Lib tech Glider or should I go back to GNU with newer technologies, I welcome any comments.
Thanks,
Niki
Hi Niki
Thanks for your message.
Based on what you’re describing, I don’t think the Dream Catcher would give you what you’re after. It sounds like you want something that’s fun and playful, but still a bit more stability over the B Nice, but not to the extent of the Twin Sister, if I have that right?
The Lib Tech Glider is marginally more stable than the B Nice, but still definitely more on the fun, playful side. Definitely an option, if you want very similar to the old B Nice, but just a touch more stable.
It might be that you like the feel of rocker between the feet. The B Nice is pretty much all rocker, but with all GNU/Lib Tech boards, they have that rocker between the feet and various amounts of camber under the feet and outside the inserts. These kinds of profiles do tend to give you a slightly looser, more playful feel – the extent to which depends on the particular board – the B Nice is at the very loose/playful end, but going with something with a bit of camber in it will still feel on the looser/more playful feel vs the Twin Sister. Going slightly softer in terms of flex will help too. Also having some camber in there will help in terms of pop for ollies, pop off jumps etc.
Based on everything, I think the following would be good options for you:
– GNU Ladies Choice (stiffer and has more camber than something like the B Nice, but certainly softer and more on the playful side vs the Twin Sister)
– GNU Velvet – a little more playful again vs the Ladies Choice
– Never Summer Infinity – a slightly more directional option, but still not very directional, and nice and playful
– GNU Gloss – a little more playful again vs the Velvet and Infinity but again not to the extent of the B Nice
– Lib Tech Glider – as we discussed, quite similar to the B Nice, but just a touch stiffer (same camber profile)
Those are pretty much in order of least playful to most playful, but all more playful than the Twin Sister (or Dream Catcher), IMO. And I’m thinking that you might prefer something “Hybrid Rocker” like this as opposed to the Hybrid Camber on the Twin Sister.
Hope this helps with your decision
Hi Nate,
I’ve been snowboarding about 5 years. I’m 167 cm tall and weigh about 62 kg. I started riding on a board my cousin gave me and I think it’s Head but I’m not sure, either way, the board is 143 cm (which I think is small for me) and I’ve been riding it for 5 years, so I think it’s time to buy a new board and binding because a bought thirty two boots a couple of years ago. The problem is that there are so many options and I can’t make a choice, so I wanted to get your opinion. I would say I’m intermediate and I mostly ride groomed slopes and I like going on the little jumps that are on the sides of groomers. I am trying to learn to carve and I like to feel speed (but not too much haha) so I want something that will be sturdy. I was looking at some boards that are 5-7 flex, but I don’t feel that I know enough to choose one.
Where I live there aren’t many shops for snowboards so i could only look at Burton, Head and Drake, and there aren’t many options. I only found one set up that I think is the best, which is Drake DFL 2019 and Drake Jade P 2019 bindings or the Queen bindings, but as I tried to do research I couldn’t find any reviews about the board or any of Drake boards and because I want to buy a good board and bindings that I can use for the next couple of years I decided to buy a board and binding online and I was hoping you can give me some advice on what board and bindings would be the best, and since I plan on buying them the summer 2020 I will probably be buying new boots too.
So I would say, given this information what do you think is the best set up (board, boots and bindings) for me? It doesn’t matter if it’s from brands that aren’t available in the shops in my country since I’m going to buy it online. And price doesn’t matter either, but I want to get my moneys worth.
I hope what I wrote is understandable since I’m not from the US 🙂
Thank you in advance
Jane
Hi Jane
Thanks for your message.
Firstly, in terms of size. For your specs as an intermediate rider and how you describe your riding, I would go somewhere in the range 145 to 148.
In terms of flex I would go any stiffer than 6/10 for you. I think you would probably find 7/10 too stiff. I would say around 5/10 flex would be best.
If you don’t tend to ride powder or just don’t see if very often, then I think an all-mountain-freestyle board would be a good bet. If you do or think you will ride a bit of powder in the future, then an all-mountain would be your best option, IMO. Some good options from this list:
– GNU Velvet (All-Mountain-Freestyle)
– Salomon Rumble Fish (All-Mountain-Freestyle)
– Rossignol Frenemy (All-Mountain)
– Burton Feelgood Flying V (All-Mountain)
– Capita Paradise (All-Mountain-Freestyle)
Or you could also check out the following:
>>My Top 5 Women’s All-Mountain Freestyle Snowboards
OR
>>My Top 6 Women’s All-Mountain Snowboards
If you have narrowed down some options from those but still need to fine tune your choice, let me know. And if you have any questions on sizing for particular boards, feel free to ask. Also for boots and bindings, let’s narrow down the board first, then we can take a look at good boots and bindings to match.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate,
My name is Celia I just bought the arbor Clovis 2020 152cm. I am an intermediate. I am 169cm and 58kg. I used to ride mostly groomer but now that I am living in Nelson bc I wanted an all mountain board with a powder profile. I am worried it’s a bit stiff 6 out of 10 (I don’t really know the range of the arbor snowboard..) and maybe a bit to tall I know they do 149cm but the guy in the shop assure me that 152(the one in the store) was a good size for me. Watching the reviews it feels like it’s a Surprising board pretty versatile. I know it’s going to be great these days I want to ride between trees but my question is do you think it’s going to be enough comfortable and forgiving to carve and play around on groomer with little tricks? Also it’s been 4 years I didn’t ride as I had 2 kids and I am wondering if this board is too technical for me. I hesitated with the Burton day trader but the arbor felt a little bit more exceptional to me. Thank you for your advices
Hi Celia
Thanks for your message.
The Clovis is rated 7/10 in terms of flex – which is quite stiff, especially for a women’s board. I haven’t ridden the Clovis, but in my experience with other Arbor boards, their flex ratings are typically right on. Other brands sometimes overstate how stiff there boards actually feel – or in some cases understate (from my personal feel of them). Arbor they feel to me about what they say they are.
Size-wise, I would have gone 149 for you for this board. 152 is, IMO, a bit too long for you, especially as an intermediate rider and considering you want to ride in trees. But even as an advanced rider, I would still say 149 for you. In general size-wise, I would say for your specs something more like 146-148. But for the Clovis, since it has such a long nose, the effective edge isn’t that long compared to overall size, so it will feel smaller than it’s total length. So, I think the 149 would be a good size, given that. It does make the 152 not as big as it sounds, and it’s probably doable, but I think I would still have gone 149 for your specs.
It’s not the kind of board that is suited to tricks. For starters it’s a bit stiff and also it’s very directional. Definitely a board more suited to carving and powder, than anything freestyle, by the looks.
It’s probably not what I would have recommended but that’s not to say you couldn’t have fun on it. But just from what you’re describing, and what I know of Arbor boards and the specs of the Clovis specifically, and sizing, I think it’s probably not ideal for an intermediate level (I would say more advanced to expert) not an ideal size and not something that will play around with tricks that well. I think if you had the 149 it would even some of those things out a bit. But remember that I haven’t actually ridden it – so this is just based on my experience with other Arbor boards and the specs of the Clovis.
Hope this helps
Hello,
I’m a 19 year old Girl from denmark and I just got into snowboarding. I would like to purchase my first snowboard, but I don’t know what would work best for me. I am around 56-58 kg (I think 125-128 lbs) and I am 167-168cm (5’6 I think). I would like a board that is good mainly on the piste but also a little in the park.
I hope you can answer my questions, and btw I’m a student so the budget is important too.
Hi Thea
Thanks for your message.
From this list, the Arbor Poparazzi would be a good choice. It’s the lowest priced on this list – and good for both piste and park. Another option not on this list, but that wasn’t far off from making this list, is the GNU Gloss. Similar price as the Poparazzi and also good for both piste and park. Also note that there is now a Poparazzi Camber and a Poparazzi Rocker – for you I’d go for the Rocker version.
Not as good as intermediate boards, but good beginner boards and a little less expensive again, you could look at the Arbor Ethos, Nitro Lectra, Roxy Sugar Banana or Rossignol Gala.
Size-wise, for your specs and assuming you’re a high-end beginner, low intermediate (if I have that right), then I would look at a range from 143-145. So for the boards mentioned that would be:
Poparazzi: 144
Gloss: 144
Ethos: 144
Lectra: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)
Sugar Banana: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)
Gala: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)
Hope this helps
Hi Nate,
Been really considering getting the Capita Paradise and was wondering what your thoughts are between getting a 143 vs. 145? I’m 5’4”, size 7 to 7.5 boots, and 125 lbs. As a beginner I was riding a 142 and enjoying learning more freestyle but still want a board that can do it all. Wondering if going to a 145 will be difficult to maneuver? Would I be able to ride the 143 with my boot size?
Hi Jenny
Thanks for your message.
Size-wise, in general, I would say around 146cm, as an advanced rider. If still more intermediate or beginner, then going a little shorter is a good idea. And if you like to ride a bit of freestyle, then going shorter can also be a good idea. I don’t think the 145 would be too difficult to maneuver for you, but in saying that, the 143 might be still be the better bet. Width-wise, it’s on the narrower end for 7.5s, but still doable for 7.5s, IMO. If you get in 7s, should be no problem.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
Hi Nate,
Thanks for the tip! That was really helpful and put my mind more at ease for making a decision! I’m more intermediate and was debating between the 143 and 145. But seeing as I want to get into more freestyle, I think I’ll go with 143!
Any thoughts on bindings that fit the flex of this board? Currently riding burton scribes but looking into Union bindings?
Hi Jenny
You’re very welcome.
The Scribes would match this board well, IMO. But if you wanted to switch to Union’s, then the Juliet or Trilogy would be good options. The Trilogy being the better quality pair, and the Juliet the cheaper option.
Hi Nate,
I bought my first board/boots/bindings a couple of years ago (with your help) and now that I’m a pretty solid intermediate rider, I’m interested in getting a new board. I live in California and spend most of my time in Tahoe with a few days in Colorado every year. I generally stick to groomers – mainly blues with the occasional black run – and dip into the trees occasionally. My current board is the Burton Genie and I’m considering the Burton Feelgood flying v because I’d really like to work on getting faster and making quicker turns. Other factors that I keep in mind are that I have big feet (I wear a 9.5 in the Burton Starstruck) and that knocked a few boards out of contention when I bought my first board. Do you think that the Feelgood Flying V is a good choice? Any other options I should consider?
Hi Stephanie
Thanks for your message.
I think the Feelgood Flying V would be a good step up for and not be too advanced either. Definitely a good solid intermediate option, IMO.
Looking back on our previous conversation, I would be weighing up between the 149 and 152 size-wise, but probably leaning more towards 149. What size Genie did you end up getting?
The Feelgood Flying V is still a looser feeling board, but certainly going to be more stable at speed vs the Genie. If you think you’d prefer a slightly more stable feeling, then you could look at something like the:
– Salomon Rumblefish
– Rossi Frenemy
– Capita Paradise
But if you like that slightly looser kind of feel (without being ultra-loose), then the Flying V would be a great option.
Hope this gives you more to go off
Hi Nate,
Thanks for the great tips! I am a small rider 5′ 3, 108lbs, 22.5cm boots. There is no snow from where I live and I go to Japan for ~10/15 days a year for the last 3 years. I think I am an intermediate level 4 rider, can ride smoothly on red line but not so stable in single black. I have my own boots with rental board for the last 3 years and looking to buy my first full set now.
From your suggestion, the Capita Paradise is exactly what I need. I like that camber dominant profile with a little bit rocker at the end, I think that type of board will help me progress. But I cannot find a size 141 anywhere, would a 143 too long for me? Also, I have found a size 138&142 Capita Jess Kimura Pro, the size fit but do you think that board would be too stiff for me? (I know it is not a true twin but it is ok I don’t ride switch much, I just want a board which can help me ride all the groomer lines stably). All in all, would you suggest a 143 Paradise or 138, 142 Jess Kimura Pro for me or any other board? Open to suggestions too!
Thanks,
Celia
Hi Celia
Thanks for your message.
Size-wise, I think something around 142 would be a great length as an advanced rider. As an intermediate rider, you could drop a little in terms of size. For the Paradise, especially for your boot size, I would prefer to see you on the 141 vs the 143. Not saying it’s going to be massive for you, but ideally I think the 141 would be a better size for you.
There isn’t really a direct men’s equivalent of the Jess Kimura Pro. In some ways it looks like a softer flexing Black Snowboard of Death. But based on specs, it looks like it’s a similar flex to the Paradise. So I wouldn’t be too concerned about the stiffness, as an intermediate rider. But it does look to have a slightly more aggressive camber profile, with mostly camber to the tail – with a small flat section – and rocker towards the nose only (no rocker in the tail). Based on specs I would say it’s a little more advanced than the Paradise overall, but it still looks intermediate suitable. Certainly more directional than the Paradise, but if you’re not riding much switch or freestyle, then that’s a good thing.
Size-wise, if you were to go for the Jess Kimura pro, it’s a touch call between the 142 and 138.
It is a narrower board – so that’s certainly a plus for your boot size, IMO. I haven’t seen a narrower waist on a women’s board than the 223mm on the 138 – and I think that would work well with your boots. But it’s just whether it would be getting a little on the short side for you not. As a beginner, I would say that would be a good size, but since you’re at an intermediate level – and are progressing towards being advanced, in the long term I think the 142 would be the better length – even if with a slightly steeper learning curve to begin with. I think for right now, you would be fine with the 138, but my only thing would be if you were to outgrow it too fast. The width on the 142 would also be fine for your boots.
Some pros and cons of those sizes:
– Shorter usually means more nimble, particularly at slower speeds, better for freestyle and better in trees – so the 138 would be better in this sense.
– Longer usually means more stability at speed and better float in powder – the 142 would be better in this sense
I would be leaning towards the 142 Jess Kimura Pro for you vs the 143 Paradise and 138 Kimura Pro – but it’s a close call between the 138 and 142.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
A couple other bindings I was looking at aside from the Lexa are the Union Milan, Union Rosa, or Burton Scribe.
Hi Wendy
I think the Scribe would work fine on Frenemy/Rumblefish. The Milan might be getting just a touch on the Soft side and the Rosa would be too soft for those boards, IMO.
If going Union your best bet would be the Trilogy or Legacy – but the Milan would work too – just not quite as good a match.
Hi Nate,
I just got off the scale. Looks like I shaved off 5 lbs from my original post, so I’m 120lbs, if that matters for length size. The Frenemy is a 2017 board size 143. Is it pretty much the same as the 2019 model? With a flex of 5, that won’t make it too surfy of a feel will it? I want to feel sturdy and secure in my board, easy to maneuver and turn, and hold my edge at faster speeds. On my current Burton feather board (2002) I feel like I’m working too hard. The Rumblefish would be a size 144 but the Frenemy fits my budget more.
I’m open to trying other bindings other than Flows. The other one I was looking at was the Burton Lexa 2018 model, size Medium. Are there other ones out there that you think would work with the Frenemy and Rumblefish?
Hi Wendy
That 5lbs shouldn’t matter too much. I would still say about the same in terms of length. As far as I know the 2017 Frenemy’s smallest size is a 144 – but in any case I think that will be fine. The Frenemy, as far as I can tell hasn’t changed at all since then, so basically the same board as the 2019 model.
Going back to 2002, I can’t find much about that model of Burton Feather. But since it’s 2002 it’s likely that it was traditional camber (all camber) as everything was back then. So in terms of camber profile, the Frenemy will have a more forgiving feel, having rocker in the profile. Could feel a little more surfy in that sense. But if the Feather of 2002 is anything like the recent Feather, then it would have been very soft flexing. So going up to the 5/10 flex of the Frenemy should feel stiffer – and since it’s from 2002 it’s likely to be a noodle by now! So the Frenemy should feel considerably stiffer compared to it, I would guess.
But if you’re really worried, you could look at something like the Jones Dream Catcher or Jones Twin Sister, which are a little stiffer and have a little more camber in them. Still doable for an intermediate rider, but a little more advanced than most in this list. But certainly very stable feeling boards. The YES Hel Yes would be another option, but the smallest size is a 146, which is just a bit too long for you, IMO.
In terms of bindings, the Lexa would work on the Frenemy (and the Rumble Fish, Dream Catcher and Twin Sister) – and medium would work size-wise. With size 6 boots you should also be able to fit into smalls as well (though depending on the brand of your boot, the medium might be the safer option). You could also check out:
>>Top Women’s All-Mountain Bindings
Note: You probably already know this, but I like to make sure – if you get Burton bindings make sure you get the “Re:Flex” model as their “EST” models only fit on Burton boards.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate!
This is such a fantastic site. I’ve learned so much! I need your opinion on a board and bindings as I’ve been getting differing recommendations from the guys at the board shops. I would say I’m an intermediate 4 and ride in Ontario, Canada. The runs here are groomers with some icy days. I don’t intend to ride in the park and on occasion I might have some fluffier powder. I have a really old 2002 Burton Feather board and Flo bindings currently. I think it’s time to upgrade to some better technology that will help with my ease of turning and I want something that will hold my edge. Basically I want to feel secure and solid on my board. I plan to ride with my kids who will be learning to board next year so I don’t plan nor do I like to go too fast. Too much speed makes me nervous.
I got new boots last year: Ride Cadence double Boa and love them so far. The guys at the pro shop recommended the Arbor Swoon rocker but after reading your site I don’t think a rocker board is for me since I want more of a solid, secure ride. I’m thinking I would do best on a hybrid rocker-camber-rocker profile so I am looking at an older 2017 Rossignal Frenemy board. I’m 125lbs and 5’2″. Size 6 boots. What do you think of that board for me? is there a lot of difference from the 2017 to the more recent Frenemy? It’s the end of the season so I’m looking for boards on sale for next season.
The other board I’m considering is the Rossignal Justice 2018 but I’m worried it might be too stiff? I mentioned 2 Rossignal boards because it uses the Magna traction technology that I think will add to edge holds. Although I’m a wee bit concerned as the pro shop guy said Rossi’s suck and that they are really a skii brand. I don’t know? Will I be frowned upon if I’m riding a Rossignal board?
Anyhow, onto bindings. Initially I was looking at the Stiletto Burton bindings but now I’m not sure if I should stick to Flow’s since that’s what I’ve been using all along. Can you recommend something for me? Arbor? Union? Burton? or Flow?
Hi Wendy
Thanks for your message.
I think the Frenemy would be a great option for you. The Justice would be too stiff for what you’re describing though.
I don’t want to judge, but sounds like the pro shop guy is a bit pretentious to me – just because Rossi are also a ski brand doesn’t mean they make terrible boards – or that snowboarders will any way look down on you for riding a “ski brand” board. K2 & Salomon also make boards and skis. It’s not that uncommon, and doesn’t make the snowboards worse. Rossi haven’t put a lot of effort into upgrading their boards in recent years, but they still make decent boards. If they continue to just release the same boards, they will start to fall behind, but for now they are still a good option, depending on what you’re looking for. That’s my opinion, anyway.
Size-wise, I would say only get the Frenemy if you can find it in the 144. Anything longer will be too long for you, IMO. That would be the longest I would go for you.
Some other really good options for what you’re describing, would be:
– Salomon Rumblefish 144 (or you could even think about going 140 – the 140 is a little on the shorter side for your specs, but given your boot size, sizing down isn’t a bad idea)
– YES Emoticon 143
In terms of bindings. When I first started snowboarding I was in flows, because I liked the idea of that quick entry. But when I changed to other bindings, I was glad I did. Now that was a fair while ago, and Flow isn’t a brand of bindings that I currently test, so I haven’t been on them for many years, so they could well have improved in that time. But I’ve never found that binding in a little slower (and flows are certainly faster) has been a problem – and worth the extra bit of time. Especially if you’re binding in standing up anyway – there’s little in it, IMO. So, definitely not saying don’t go Flow, but trying something new might be a good thing and you might well like the change.
For something like the Frenemy or Rumble Fish, I would look to get on something a little stiffer than the Stiletto – just because I like to match board and binding flex as much as possible and I would say 5/10 flex for the Frenemy and Rumblefish and more like 3/10 for the Stiletto. The Emoticon is more like 4/10 flex, so that would be a better match if you were to go stiletto. Also, to match the Ride Cadence, a stiffer binding would also work better, IMO.
Also check out, for more options:
>>Top Women’s Freestyle Bindings
>>Top Women’s All-Mountain Bindings
If you see any other bindings on sale that you think might be suitable, let me know, and I would be happy to give you my opinion.
Hope this helps
Hi Nate
Im hoping you can help. I do most of my riding in Australia where the conditions can be varied. For example, at the moment we havent had any snow for 5 days, but, it’s been really cold (for here anyway): -6C overnight to -2C during the day. Then, in a few days it’s forecast to snow for about 4 days straight! So I could be riding on hard packed ice, fresh snow, snow out of the machines, or slush because despite the cold conditions, it does occaisionally rain!
I’ve been riding for about 4 seasons (but only about a week each time on the holidays), and I’m a mid-range intermediate. Sometimes I like to adventure off the groomers to practice some fast turns on some bumps, or test myelf on narrow runs, and then other days it’s just the groomers, or something a bit steeper. I do like the adventure of ungroomed slopes I must admit – probably because the groomers can get a little crowded in the holidays as you can imagine. I’m not interested in the park although I do like to practice switch and 360s (not in the air LOL) but only on easy slopes – just for fun.
I rode the new WHIP (demo) which I really liked but it is directional so I’m a bit concerned – although I understand it should not be a problem unless I want to go to the park. But I cant find any reviews of this board as it’s very new.
I’ve previously ridden hire boards which tend to be soft and rocker only, or just completely flat. I should be riding a 145-148cm board but last season the hire place only had 155cm so I rode that which was ok.
I’ve also demo-ed Burton Talent Scout but did not work for me; it just didnt seem to turn as well. I have also demo-ed the Burton Rewind 2019 but found it too soft.
Should I also consider the GNU B PRO 2020 which has the sintered base. It is a twin but the shape seems the same as the WHIP. The WHIP is not sintered. Is this a problem?
(On mountain there are no JONES or YES boards to trial, so selection is a bit limited.)….I’ve been reading reviews and perhaps the Twin may have worked as well but it’s not an option to demo.
So in essence, as there doesnt seem to be any reviews on the WHIP, what do you think of it? Any other views/advice you may have?
Many thanks from Down Under.
Julia
Hi Julia
Thanks for your message.
Usually I would say something like the WHIP is probably too stiff/too much camber for an intermediate rider, but since you’ve tried it and liked it, then that doesn’t sound like an issue for you. Also, I’ve found GNU boards tend to be softer than what GNU rates them as – especially after breaking them in a bit. So, that’s certainly an option. Being directional is only really a problem if you like to ride switch a lot – and if you were landing/taking off switch a lot for 180s, 540s etc. But if not, then it shouldn’t be an issue. There’s a 148 which sounds like it would fit in your size range (is that the size you demoed?).
But yeah, if you wanted to go for a twin ride, then the B Pro has the same camber profile, but is a True Twin shape. The sintered base isn’t a deal breaker, but having a sintered base is preferable, usually. If you were getting a lot of slow, sticky snow, then I would say sintered base for sure, but otherwise, it’s not a deal-breaker, but good to have (so long as you’re willing to wax it regularly – the extruded base isn’t as necessary to wax it regularly).
Another option, if you wanted to go twin, but with a little less camber is the Lib Tech No.43 – also a new board. It’s the closest women’s equivalent to the Lib Tech TRS if you wanted to check out my review on that.
But like I say, no reason not to go directional necessarily, if you’re not going to be doing a lot of freestyle riding – and given that you rode it and you liked it, the WHIP should certainly be an option.
Hope this helps with your decision
Thanks Nate for your comment. The board shop gave me the Capital Jess Kimura Pro to try today – with the moose on it. My daughter spotted it and immediately wanted me to try it!! LOL
Actually also really liked it. I’ve read some reviews which rate it pretty highly.
So now I’m a bit stuck now as the Magna traction is supposed to be good on ice – which we can get So I’m wondering if the Capita will do just as well. Unhelpfully it snowed overnight so right now we are on powder!!
Anyway- any further comments on this Capita board?
Thanks so much
Julia
Hi Julia
Apologies for slow reply – on vacation with limited internet.
There isn’t an exact men’s equivalent of the Jess Kimura Pro – but it’s quite similar to the BSOD, which is a great board. There isn’t a Capita board that I haven’t liked in good snow. But they don’t tend to be as good in icy snow unfortunately. If you were to only seldom get icy snow, then I’d say you’d be fine so long as you kept your edges sharp, but if you get it a lot, then it’s ideal, IMO.