The Best Intermediate Snowboards for Women: My Top 10

Comments

1. Carina says

   August 3, 2020 at 3:39 pm

   Hi Nate,

   I have snowboarded for several years … but only 1-2 times per season. So I am good on blue/red slopes but don’t do any tricks or so.
   For this season I would like to improve!

   I think I would need a lower intermediate board. What do u think?
   What boards would you recommend? (Can also be from previous season)
   I am regular, 64kg, 175cm tall.

   Thank you so much
   Carina

   Reply

   • Carina says

     August 3, 2020 at 3:42 pm

     Also please size of the board and if you have recommendations for binding and boots.

     Thank you so much 🙂

     Reply

     • Nate says

       August 4, 2020 at 10:39 am

       Hi Carina

       Thanks for your messages.

       I think if you’re looking to ride groomers and add in a few tricks then something like an all-mountain-freestyle board would work well if you’re not looking to go off-piste. If you also want to start going off piste, then an all-mountain (aka do-it-all) board would work well. In terms of ability, I think a low intermediate board would probably work well, if that’s where you feel your level is. If you want to be a little more certain check out – The Snowboarding Skill Levels – if you feel you are level 3 or 4 based on those descriptions, then certainly a low-intermediate board would be appropriate. If you’re level 4-5, you could also look at some other options. Some boards that are suitable for a low intermediate level would certainly still be suitable, but you would also have other options. Let me know where you feel you’re at there, and I can adjust my recommendations, if necessary.

       But just based on going with a low intermediate suitable board, then one of the following, if you’re not looking to go off-piste:

       – Arbor Poparazzi
       – YES Emoticon
       – Salomon Rumble Fish
       – Capita Paradies

       If you do want to do a little off-piste riding, in powder, then the following will give you a little more in terms of powder float:

       – Never Summer Infinity
       – Rossignol Frenemy
       – Burton Feelgood Flying V

       A past season option that isn’t on this list you could look at is the GNU Velvet. Or you could look for one of the above in a past season model too.

       Size-wise, I would look at something around 148-150 in terms of length. Most of the above boards should have something in that size range. In terms of width, if you could let me know your boot size (or your shoe size if you’re not sure), I can also have a quick check to make sure the widths of those boards is appropriate.

       In terms of boots and bindings, it will depend partly on which board you go for. It’s a good idea to try to match the board and binding flex relatively close, but if you want to start looking, the following are options that will likely match to one of those boards. But we can get more specific once you’ve decided on the board.

       >>Top Women’s Freestyle Bindings

       >>Top Women’s All-Mountain Bindings

       >>My Top Women’s Freestyle Snowboard Boots

       >>My Top Women’s All-Mountain Snowboard Boots

       Hope this helps

       Reply

       • Carina says

         August 5, 2020 at 2:51 pm

         Thank you for your detailed response.

         I checked out the page you sent and I’m definitely a good 4.
         …Learning to be a 5.

         I am a shoe size 10 (boot size 10/11)
         175cm, ~64kg.

         I would prefer a board that is forgiving. I’d like to improve but most important for me is to have fun.

         I live in the US but I am from Austria – so I would ride in the US as well as Alps.

         Any best recommendation for me? 🙂
         Also if you have ideas about binding/boots please let me know.

         Thank you so much 🙂
         Carina

         Reply

         • Nate says

           August 6, 2020 at 10:19 am

           Hi Carina

           Thanks for the extra details.

           Because of boot size, I would probably cross the Poparazzi, Paradise & Infinity off the list, because in the right length they’re pushing it for being too narrow. And probably the Velvet too.

           So that would leave the Emoticon 149, Rumble Fish 148, Frenemy 150 and Feelgood Flying V 149. They’re all going to be on the narrow side for your boots too, but I don’t think you’ll run into boot drag issues. Of course no guarantees, but, especially if you’re not going to be riding overly aggressively, I don’t see that being an issue.

           Since you want to keep things easy going/forgiving, I won’t look into some other slightly more aggressive options. I think one of those would work really well for what you’re describing.

           If you were really worried about width, then you could potentially look into some men’s options. But definitely don’t want to go too wide as that can make initiating turns more difficult and won’t want to go too stiff, since you want to keep things forgiving. And there will be less options in that length range too. I think one of those would be your best bet, but some men’s boards could be options too, if you were really worried about width.

       • Carina says

         August 6, 2020 at 6:16 am

         Also one more thing…
         Is there a big difference between male and female boards or is it just the design?
         Eg if a model has a male and female version – is it just the design that makes them different or also technical parts?
         Thanks so much
         Carina

         Reply

         • Nate says

           August 6, 2020 at 10:22 am

           Hi Carina

           For the most part it’s design. But also men’s boards do tend to be stiffer. And they’re always wider. You can definitely get around the flex thing, by going with a softer option, if you wanted to go men’s boards. But the width would be the biggest thing to watch out for. As I mentioned in my last reply, you don’t want to go too wide. But I think there would be men’s options that are suitable for your boot size, in that 148-150 length range. There won’t be many, but there would be a few. I can give you some options if you’d like, but also I think the options in my previous reply would work well.

       • Carina says

         August 6, 2020 at 4:27 pm

         Thank you!
         I think I like the Burton Feelgood the most from your options – I did some research and it seems like I would like it. I also like the rumble fish although I connect Salomon more with skiing than snowboarding but this doesn’t mean anything.

         If you don’t mind to give me also some men’s options – out of curiosity and to have the options … that would be nice 😬

         thank you so much for all your information
         Carina

         Reply

         • Nate says

           August 7, 2020 at 12:51 pm

           Hi Carina

           Some potential men’s options would be:

           – GNU Money 148 (247mm waist width)
           – Arbor Formula Rocker 148 (247.5mm waist)
           – YES Basic 149 (248mm waist) – essentially the men’s version of the YES Emoticon
           – Capita Outerspace Living 148 (242mm waist) – essentially the men’s version of the Capita Paradise, but wider width

           The first 3 are options if you felt like you wanted something wider than the Feelgood Flying V/Rumble Fish. The Outerspace Living an option in case you really liked the Paradise. The Paradise, IMO, is too narrow for you, so this is essentially a wider version of the Paradise.

           One thing to note, just to make sure – if you go Feelgood, go Feelgood Flying V. The Feelgood (which is a full camber option) is a good board – but it’s stiffer and more aggressive. Since you’re looking for something more forgiving, the Flying V version would suit you, but the Feelgood you probably wouldn’t like.

           Oh and there’s also the YES Hello, which is new for 2021, which would also be an option, that I missed before. The 149 (241mm waist) would be a good size for you, IMO.

       • Carina says

         August 9, 2020 at 9:23 am

         Thank you for all your info.
         Carina

         Reply

         • Nate says

           August 9, 2020 at 8:20 pm

           You’re very welcome Carina.

2. Beatrice says

   May 28, 2020 at 4:59 pm

   Hi Nate!

   I hope you’re doing well. I couple of years ago after taking my first lessons I contacted you asking for an advice for my first board……It was Rossignol Myth and I’ve really loved it (….and love it 🙂 . Now I’d like to change it / get a different one being more confident with speed and turns (intermediate level) which could help me to progress (last winter I took some lessons to improve riding and perform first tricks and jumps ).
   I’m 170 cm / 60 kg – Size boots : 39 cm / 8 US . Bindings on Myth : Union Rosa . Boots: Nitro Monarch TLS. I have to admit that I fell in love with Capita Birds of a Feather 2019 (because I love barn owl ) but I know that it’s for expert riders so ….. is Capita Paradise feasible? ….Any your advice is always very appreciated . Thank you and greetings from Italy. Bea

   Reply

   • Nate says

     May 29, 2020 at 10:36 am

     Hi Bea

     Thanks for your message.

     Yeah I would say that Birds of a Feather is a little on the advanced side, but the Paradise would be a great option. A good step up from the Myth but without being too big a leap. Anything on this list would work for sure, but the Paradise does tick a lot of boxes – more advanced than the Myth without being too advanced, better for handling speed, but also a board you can definitely do tricks with.

     I would be leaning either Paradise or Salomon Rumble Fish for you, and since you already like the look of the Paradise, I think it’s a really good option.

     Size-wise, I’d be looking at something in the range 146-148. So I’d say the 147 would be the best size for the Paradise for you. I’m guessing you’re on the 144 Myth? Assuming that’s the case, then I think 147 Paradise is a nice step up that should help you progress, without being too big a step.

     Hope this helps

     Reply

     • Beatrice says

       May 30, 2020 at 3:46 pm

       Thank you Nate, I’ll consider also option Salomon Rumble Fish.
       The size of my Myth is 149.

       Thank you again!

       Reply

       • Nate says

         May 31, 2020 at 12:35 pm

         You’re very welcome Beatrice!

         In that case, you could consider the 149 Paradise too. For the Rumble Fish, the 148 would be the best size, IMO. You could still go 147 for the Paradise, but if you’re comfortable with a 149 length, then that becomes an option for the Paradise.

         Reply

3. Katie says

   April 30, 2020 at 10:41 am

   Hi Nate,

   I hope you’re doing well. I wrote to you a couple of years ago when I was just getting back into snowboarding after a long time away, and looking for a beginner board to relearn on. I went with the Rossignol Frenemy, and I’ve really loved it.

   At this point I have a few seasons under my belt, and I would describe myself as low level intermediate. I’m confident on blue runs, and go on most black runs, but will leaf down the steeps often as I don’t feel confident in being able to hold the turns in those sections. I’m feeling like I’m stuck in a zone where I’m lacking confidence to keep progressing, I’m wondering if a different board might help, or if it’s just mental.

   My current board is a 147cm, I am 5’5, 150lbs. I ride in a lot of icy conditions and find the frenemy great for that, and the board is really catch free and easy to turn, which I love too. I’m really looking for something to help me feel more confident gaining speed, taking on steeper sections. I’m not looking to do anything in particular otherwise, just go have fun getting down the hill. I’m very confident in my turning on less steep sections, but feel uneasy with speed especially.

   Thanks so much!
   Katie

   Reply

   • Nate says

     April 30, 2020 at 1:22 pm

     Hi Katie

     Thanks for your message and good to hear from you again.

     I think as a low level intermediate rider I think the Frenemy is well suited, so one option is certainly to stick with the Frenemy for another season or 2 and see how you get on and try some other things. The main thing I would try, if you stay with the Frenemy, is to get a lesson, preferably a private lesson. Not the cheapest for sure, but I’ve always found great value from the lessons I’ve done – even after riding for a long time, I always find a good instructor will find something in my riding that I can work on.

     Another quick thing, is to make sure that you’re really trying to ride “across” the slope on those steeper runs. Ride across to control your speed, but do your turns properly and then gradually allow your self more speed as you get more comfortable. And if you pick up too much speed, then, if you’ve got the space on the slope, really focus on heading across the slope to control your speed, and if you don’t, then rather than leading, try putting on the breaks and then start your turns again, to check your speed rather than leafing. Something to try anyway.

     If you did decide to change boards, I would look up to something like the Jones Twin Sister or YES Hel Yes as a good step up, without going too advanced (and still being good in hard/icy conditions). Also, to get a bit more stability at speed, you could look to go a little longer. For your specs, as a low intermediate rider, I would be looking at around 148-150. So for the Twin Sister and the Hel Yes, would be the 149. As a beginner, I would say more like 147-149, but as a more intermediate rider, you could certainly go a little longer, if you were to change boards.

     But yeah, if you haven’t already, I would look into taking a lesson, sticking with the 147 Frenemy for at least one more season and then maybe look into upgrading after that. But if you really wanted to upgrade now, then I’d say 149 Hel Yes or Twin Sister.

     Hope this helps

     Reply

4. KristenB says

   February 20, 2020 at 7:57 am

   Hey Nate,

   Great info here and I was hoping you could help me source my next board. I’m an intermediate rider, currently riding a Roxy Ally 148. I’m about 5’7, ~145 lbs and mostly ride groomers that tend to be rather icy but am looking to progress in my riding. All mountain, no park for me!

   I’ve been looking at the Birds of a Feather (not sure if I should stick with 148 or go up to 150) but am wondering how the Ally which I’m currently riding (camber/rocker/camber) would stack up tot he Birds of a Feather (rocker/camber/rocker) on the ice and catching those edges.

   Open to other suggestions too!

   Thanks for your help!
   Kristen

   Reply

   • Nate says

     February 21, 2020 at 2:54 pm

     Hi Kristen

     Thanks for your message.

     Firstly, in terms of icy conditions. I’ve ridden a lot of good hybrid camber (rocker/camber/rocker) boards that are good in icy conditions and a lot that aren’t ditto for hybrid rocker (camber/rocker/camber), so I don’t get a correlation between those camber profiles in terms of their performance in those types of conditions, from my experience.

     However, I have found the Birds of a Feather (or at least the men’s equivalent “Defenders of Awesome”) to be not amazing in hard/icy conditions, so that, more so than the camber profile, would be what I would consider more when it comes to the Birds of a Feather.

     If you’re looking for something that can also perform in powder, but want to maximize edge hold in hard/icy conditions, then I would look at the following:

     – YES Hel Yes
     – Rossignol Frenemy

     The Hel Yes being the more advanced of the two boards, but if you feel like you’re solidly intermediate (as opposed to beginner, bordering on intermediate) I’d say you would be fine.

     If you don’t see powder much, or if it’s never that deep, then the above two are still options, but you could also consider:

     – YES Emoticon
     – GNU Ladies Choice
     – Lib Tech No.43
     – Niche Nightshade (though you would want to be at least a solid intermediate rider, bordering on advanced for this one)

     The YES Emoticon being the most “friendly” ride, but again, like with the Hel Yes, if you’re solidly intermediate, then the Ladies Choice and No.43 definitely options too. The Nightshade another step more advanced/aggressive again.

     There are a number of other great options I could add to both of those lists, that are still good in hard/icy conditions, but just not quite as good, like:

     – Salomon Rumble Fish
     – Never Summer Infinity

     Among others, but if you want to maximize your edge hold in icy conditions, those are great options, IMO.

     Size-wise, anything from 148-150 would be a good range to look at, IMO. If you narrow down your choices (if you don’t go with Birds of a Feather) and want my opinion on sizing for a specific board, let me know (sometimes sizing can depend on the board). For the Birds of a Feather I’d be leaning towards 150, but 148 still an option, if you preferred to stay shorter. The benefits of going shorter mean a more maneuverable board, particularly at slower speeds and something that’s better in trees and for freestyle riding. The longer gives you a bit more in terms of stability at speed and float in powder.

     Hope this helps with your decision

     Reply

5. LK says

   February 10, 2020 at 7:48 am

   Hi,
   I’m an advanced beginner rider, been riding once or twice a year for the past 4 years. I’ve been riding my husband’s Arbor A-Frame 158 board, and it’s feeling pretty bulky as I start to progress and work on my turns, etc. I’m about 5’8″ and on the larger side of female riders (about 210 lbs), but have always been very athletic. I’m trying to figure out what the best board might be. I don’t see myself every riding in the park, mostly just groomers. I’m debating between the Arbor Poparazzi Camber board and the Salomon Rumble fish, but also open to other suggestions if you have any.

   Reply

   • Nate says

     February 11, 2020 at 12:32 pm

     Hi LK

     Thanks for your message.

     Yeah the Arbor A-Frame is a bit of a beast, especially for a beginner, so good call to look for something else. Size-wise it’s not too far off, but it’s quite technical camber wise and quite stiff.

     I think size-wise, ideally you’re looking at something around 155, 156 as a high-end beginner. You could go for something closer to 158 as a more advanced rider, but I would stick to something a little shorter – and certainly softer flexing – and with a more friendly camber profile.

     Neither of those boards come in those sizes, so if you went there you’d have to look at the 152 Rumble Fish or the 153 Poparazzi. I would be leaning towards the 152 Rumble Fish in that case – mostly because it’s slightly stiffer – and even though you don’t want to go too stiff, if the board is shorter than ideal and/or if you’re over the weight recommendations, then the board will feel softer. So in the case of the Poparazzi, it might feel too soft for you in the 153, particularly coming off a 158 A-Frame. The Rossignol Frenemy in 153 would also be a good choice there.

     Some other good options, that I think would work well for you:

     – Salomon Wonder 155
     – Arbor Swoon Rocker 156
     – GNU Ladies Choice 153.5
     – Jones Twin Sister 155
     – Jones Dream Catcher 154
     – Yes Hel Yes 155

     The other advantage of going with one of these over the A-Frame you’ve been riding is that they will likely be a better width for your feet. But if you could also let me know your boot size, that would also help to determine if these sizes are appropriate. But I suspect that the A-Frame, as well as being too technical, too stiff and too long, is too wide for you as well.

     Hope this helps

     Reply

     • LK says

       February 14, 2020 at 12:39 pm

       Thank you for your insight! I wear a size 10 boot, so I’m not sure how that plays into it, but I’m going to look into some of these other boards you’ve listed.

       Reply

       • Nate says

         February 14, 2020 at 3:14 pm

         Hi LK

         I’d say for most of those boards in those sizes you should be fine with a 10, but if you narrow it down and aren’t sure, let me know which one(s) you’re considering and I can give you my opinion on width.

         Reply

6. Julie Neller says

   January 14, 2020 at 12:41 am

   Hi Nate,

   I’m looking at buying my first board after always hiring them. I’m an intermediate rider, mainly ride blues but do try some blacks. I love finding tree runs when there is powder but don’t venture into back country. I don’t ride park but like finding small jumps on the hill. I’m looking at the burton feel good flying v or the capita paradise. I’m 5’2″, 50kg and a size 8 boot. Do you have a recommendation of these two or any other boards?

   Thanks,
   Julie

   Reply

   • Nate says

     January 14, 2020 at 12:16 pm

     Hi Julie

     Thanks for your message.

     I think both boards would work well for how you describe your riding. Some more details that might help your decision

     1. The Feelgood Flying V is a little better in powder vs the Paradise
     2. The Paradise a little better for carving

     But otherwise pretty equal – in terms of uneven terrain, jumps, spins, butters, speed etc.

     Size-wise, I would be looking in the range of around 139-141 for your specs. Not sure what size you’ve been renting but maybe the case that you were given longer boards, if they didn’t have anything available in that size, but that’s the range I would look at based on specs.

     So for the Paradise, that would be the 141. It’s on the narrow side for size 8 boots, but I don’t think you would have any drag issues at that width.

     For the Feelgood Flying V, the 142 would be your best bet.

     Hope this helps with your decision

     Reply

7. Faye Wachs says

   December 14, 2019 at 1:27 pm

   Hi-
   This is sooooo helpful! If you have time, I would value your advice!
   I get a lot of pain in my foot (plantar faciatis) and I am convinced tight bindings make it way worse. I was thinking upgrading to the Burton step ins would help and thought, why not a new board too! I am a solid intermediate rider (been riding for about 30 years, but only a few times a year). I usually really enjoy blue and blue black and a few black diamonds. I prefer control to speed. I like to do small jumps and occasionally ride a rail, but am definitely an all mountain rider. I want to be able to go either direction but am goofy. I love the feel of riding in powder- the floating sensation, but I also really like control. Anxiety makes cat tracks not my favorite, so the control helps there. I am not fast, I am zen riding the mountain. I will never be fast. I don’t want to be fast. I want to ride a mountain and enjoy life. I would love suggestions for the right board, and your opinion on the step in bindings. My “local” spot is Mammoth, but I have a trip to Switzerland (Zermatt) planned for my 50th later this month.:) Thanks so much! Also I am 5 foot 3 and about 135 lbs. I am also teaching my kid, he’s only 7 so I got him a used Burton, but soon!:) I have a Ride board right now, can’t remember the model and no complaints, but I’m not a complainer…

   Reply

   • Nate says

     December 15, 2019 at 2:12 pm

     Hi Faye

     Thanks for your message.

     I haven’t tried the Step-Ons, so I can’t be much help there. I would say that something softer flexing, without being too soft would be the way to go – and that would also suit how you describe your riding. I would say around 4/5 or 5/5 in terms of flex. So, if you were to go Step-On, then I would say either the Limelight Step-On boot or the Ritual LTD Step-On, depending on budget.

     For the board, based on what you’re describing, I think the Never Summer Infinity would be ideal. That’s the first board that came to mind, and weighing up the options, I’m even more leaning towards it. It’s something that’s a really easy going ride, but will give you some decent float in powder – without being too directional, so still easy to ride switch on. I think it’s a really good combination of everything you’re describing. The Rossignol Frenemy and Burton Feelgood Flying V (but definitely the Flying V version for you, not the camber version) would be my next choices.

     Size-wise, I would say around 144-146 would be a good range to look at. But since you’ve been riding as long as you have, what you’re used to riding should also be taken into account. If you’re used to riding significantly longer or significantly shorter than that, we can revise that range.

     So for those 3 options, I would say:

     Infinity: 145 – you could definitely ride the 147 too, and if you’re used to something longer, then that might be the better bet
     Frenemy: 147 or 144
     Feelgood Flying V: 146

     Hope this helps with your decision

     Reply

     • Faye Wachs says

       December 15, 2019 at 6:50 pm

       Thank you! Very helpful!

       Reply

       • Nate says

         December 16, 2019 at 11:37 am

         You’re very welcome Faye. Hope you have an awesome season!

         Reply

8. Niki says

   December 11, 2019 at 12:21 pm

   Hi Nate, I am after a new board to get some fun back in my 1 or 2 weeks a year on the European snow. I used to love my GNU b nice but wanted a bit more stability and better carving, got a 2016 Jones Twin Sister and found it stable but underwhelming, bit heavy to Ollie and mess about on the edge of piste or in trees, I miss the fun, but don’t go in parks, only accessible powder, small kickers.
   I’m wondering if the Jones Dream catcher might bring the fun of buttering and pottering about, also interested in Lib tech Glider or should I go back to GNU with newer technologies, I welcome any comments.
   Thanks,
   Niki

   Reply

   • Nate says

     December 12, 2019 at 3:54 pm

     Hi Niki

     Thanks for your message.

     Based on what you’re describing, I don’t think the Dream Catcher would give you what you’re after. It sounds like you want something that’s fun and playful, but still a bit more stability over the B Nice, but not to the extent of the Twin Sister, if I have that right?

     The Lib Tech Glider is marginally more stable than the B Nice, but still definitely more on the fun, playful side. Definitely an option, if you want very similar to the old B Nice, but just a touch more stable.

     It might be that you like the feel of rocker between the feet. The B Nice is pretty much all rocker, but with all GNU/Lib Tech boards, they have that rocker between the feet and various amounts of camber under the feet and outside the inserts. These kinds of profiles do tend to give you a slightly looser, more playful feel – the extent to which depends on the particular board – the B Nice is at the very loose/playful end, but going with something with a bit of camber in it will still feel on the looser/more playful feel vs the Twin Sister. Going slightly softer in terms of flex will help too. Also having some camber in there will help in terms of pop for ollies, pop off jumps etc.

     Based on everything, I think the following would be good options for you:

     – GNU Ladies Choice (stiffer and has more camber than something like the B Nice, but certainly softer and more on the playful side vs the Twin Sister)
     – GNU Velvet – a little more playful again vs the Ladies Choice
     – Never Summer Infinity – a slightly more directional option, but still not very directional, and nice and playful
     – GNU Gloss – a little more playful again vs the Velvet and Infinity but again not to the extent of the B Nice
     – Lib Tech Glider – as we discussed, quite similar to the B Nice, but just a touch stiffer (same camber profile)

     Those are pretty much in order of least playful to most playful, but all more playful than the Twin Sister (or Dream Catcher), IMO. And I’m thinking that you might prefer something “Hybrid Rocker” like this as opposed to the Hybrid Camber on the Twin Sister.

     Hope this helps with your decision

     Reply

     • Niki says

       January 22, 2020 at 10:47 am

       Hi Nate,
       I just want to thank you for your recommendations, I also read through what you recommended other riders which let me to this years Salomon Rumble fish and that’s the board I bought, just back from an amazing week with this board, I couldn’t be happier, what a fun, reliable board, certainly brought the pleasure back, I can highly recommend it, I am also impressed with the quality of the top deck and base, not a mark on it after a weeks use, excellent edge grip.
       Kind regards,
       Niki

       Reply

       • Nate says

         January 22, 2020 at 12:28 pm

         Hi Niki

         Thanks for the update. Awesome that you’re digging your Rumble Fish! Always great to hear about people’s experiences/insights on their gear. Hope you have an awesome time on it for the rest of the season!

         Reply

9. Jane says

   December 4, 2019 at 1:27 pm

   Hi Nate,

   I’ve been snowboarding about 5 years. I’m 167 cm tall and weigh about 62 kg. I started riding on a board my cousin gave me and I think it’s Head but I’m not sure, either way, the board is 143 cm (which I think is small for me) and I’ve been riding it for 5 years, so I think it’s time to buy a new board and binding because a bought thirty two boots a couple of years ago. The problem is that there are so many options and I can’t make a choice, so I wanted to get your opinion. I would say I’m intermediate and I mostly ride groomed slopes and I like going on the little jumps that are on the sides of groomers. I am trying to learn to carve and I like to feel speed (but not too much haha) so I want something that will be sturdy. I was looking at some boards that are 5-7 flex, but I don’t feel that I know enough to choose one.
   Where I live there aren’t many shops for snowboards so i could only look at Burton, Head and Drake, and there aren’t many options. I only found one set up that I think is the best, which is Drake DFL 2019 and Drake Jade P 2019 bindings or the Queen bindings, but as I tried to do research I couldn’t find any reviews about the board or any of Drake boards and because I want to buy a good board and bindings that I can use for the next couple of years I decided to buy a board and binding online and I was hoping you can give me some advice on what board and bindings would be the best, and since I plan on buying them the summer 2020 I will probably be buying new boots too.
   So I would say, given this information what do you think is the best set up (board, boots and bindings) for me? It doesn’t matter if it’s from brands that aren’t available in the shops in my country since I’m going to buy it online. And price doesn’t matter either, but I want to get my moneys worth.
   I hope what I wrote is understandable since I’m not from the US 🙂

   Thank you in advance
   Jane

   Reply

   • Nate says

     December 5, 2019 at 9:23 am

     Hi Jane

     Thanks for your message.

     Firstly, in terms of size. For your specs as an intermediate rider and how you describe your riding, I would go somewhere in the range 145 to 148.

     In terms of flex I would go any stiffer than 6/10 for you. I think you would probably find 7/10 too stiff. I would say around 5/10 flex would be best.

     If you don’t tend to ride powder or just don’t see if very often, then I think an all-mountain-freestyle board would be a good bet. If you do or think you will ride a bit of powder in the future, then an all-mountain would be your best option, IMO. Some good options from this list:

     – GNU Velvet (All-Mountain-Freestyle)
     – Salomon Rumble Fish (All-Mountain-Freestyle)
     – Rossignol Frenemy (All-Mountain)
     – Burton Feelgood Flying V (All-Mountain)
     – Capita Paradise (All-Mountain-Freestyle)

     Or you could also check out the following:

     >>My Top 5 Women’s All-Mountain Freestyle Snowboards

     OR

     >>My Top 6 Women’s All-Mountain Snowboards

     If you have narrowed down some options from those but still need to fine tune your choice, let me know. And if you have any questions on sizing for particular boards, feel free to ask. Also for boots and bindings, let’s narrow down the board first, then we can take a look at good boots and bindings to match.

     Hope this helps

     Reply

10. Celia Hayet says

    October 31, 2019 at 11:50 pm

    Hi Nate,
    My name is Celia I just bought the arbor Clovis 2020 152cm. I am an intermediate. I am 169cm and 58kg. I used to ride mostly groomer but now that I am living in Nelson bc I wanted an all mountain board with a powder profile. I am worried it’s a bit stiff 6 out of 10 (I don’t really know the range of the arbor snowboard..) and maybe a bit to tall I know they do 149cm but the guy in the shop assure me that 152(the one in the store) was a good size for me. Watching the reviews it feels like it’s a Surprising board pretty versatile. I know it’s going to be great these days I want to ride between trees but my question is do you think it’s going to be enough comfortable and forgiving to carve and play around on groomer with little tricks? Also it’s been 4 years I didn’t ride as I had 2 kids and I am wondering if this board is too technical for me. I hesitated with the Burton day trader but the arbor felt a little bit more exceptional to me. Thank you for your advices

    Reply

    • Nate says

      November 1, 2019 at 2:39 pm

      Hi Celia

      Thanks for your message.

      The Clovis is rated 7/10 in terms of flex – which is quite stiff, especially for a women’s board. I haven’t ridden the Clovis, but in my experience with other Arbor boards, their flex ratings are typically right on. Other brands sometimes overstate how stiff there boards actually feel – or in some cases understate (from my personal feel of them). Arbor they feel to me about what they say they are.

      Size-wise, I would have gone 149 for you for this board. 152 is, IMO, a bit too long for you, especially as an intermediate rider and considering you want to ride in trees. But even as an advanced rider, I would still say 149 for you. In general size-wise, I would say for your specs something more like 146-148. But for the Clovis, since it has such a long nose, the effective edge isn’t that long compared to overall size, so it will feel smaller than it’s total length. So, I think the 149 would be a good size, given that. It does make the 152 not as big as it sounds, and it’s probably doable, but I think I would still have gone 149 for your specs.

      It’s not the kind of board that is suited to tricks. For starters it’s a bit stiff and also it’s very directional. Definitely a board more suited to carving and powder, than anything freestyle, by the looks.

      It’s probably not what I would have recommended but that’s not to say you couldn’t have fun on it. But just from what you’re describing, and what I know of Arbor boards and the specs of the Clovis specifically, and sizing, I think it’s probably not ideal for an intermediate level (I would say more advanced to expert) not an ideal size and not something that will play around with tricks that well. I think if you had the 149 it would even some of those things out a bit. But remember that I haven’t actually ridden it – so this is just based on my experience with other Arbor boards and the specs of the Clovis.

      Hope this helps

      Reply

11. Thea moeller poulsen says

    October 4, 2019 at 12:14 pm

    Hello,
    I’m a 19 year old Girl from denmark and I just got into snowboarding. I would like to purchase my first snowboard, but I don’t know what would work best for me. I am around 56-58 kg (I think 125-128 lbs) and I am 167-168cm (5’6 I think). I would like a board that is good mainly on the piste but also a little in the park.
    I hope you can answer my questions, and btw I’m a student so the budget is important too.

    Reply

    • Nate says

      October 5, 2019 at 9:29 am

      Hi Thea

      Thanks for your message.

      From this list, the Arbor Poparazzi would be a good choice. It’s the lowest priced on this list – and good for both piste and park. Another option not on this list, but that wasn’t far off from making this list, is the GNU Gloss. Similar price as the Poparazzi and also good for both piste and park. Also note that there is now a Poparazzi Camber and a Poparazzi Rocker – for you I’d go for the Rocker version.

      Not as good as intermediate boards, but good beginner boards and a little less expensive again, you could look at the Arbor Ethos, Nitro Lectra, Roxy Sugar Banana or Rossignol Gala.

      Size-wise, for your specs and assuming you’re a high-end beginner, low intermediate (if I have that right), then I would look at a range from 143-145. So for the boards mentioned that would be:

      Poparazzi: 144
      Gloss: 144
      Ethos: 144
      Lectra: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)
      Sugar Banana: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)
      Gala: 142 (or 146 potentially, depending if you wanted to go longer or shorter)

      Hope this helps

      Reply

12. Jenny says

    September 28, 2019 at 12:44 am

    Hi Nate,

    Been really considering getting the Capita Paradise and was wondering what your thoughts are between getting a 143 vs. 145? I’m 5’4”, size 7 to 7.5 boots, and 125 lbs. As a beginner I was riding a 142 and enjoying learning more freestyle but still want a board that can do it all. Wondering if going to a 145 will be difficult to maneuver? Would I be able to ride the 143 with my boot size?

    Reply

    • Nate says

      September 28, 2019 at 10:08 am

      Hi Jenny

      Thanks for your message.

      Size-wise, in general, I would say around 146cm, as an advanced rider. If still more intermediate or beginner, then going a little shorter is a good idea. And if you like to ride a bit of freestyle, then going shorter can also be a good idea. I don’t think the 145 would be too difficult to maneuver for you, but in saying that, the 143 might be still be the better bet. Width-wise, it’s on the narrower end for 7.5s, but still doable for 7.5s, IMO. If you get in 7s, should be no problem.

      Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision

      Reply

      • Jenny says

        September 28, 2019 at 10:26 pm

        Hi Nate,

        Thanks for the tip! That was really helpful and put my mind more at ease for making a decision! I’m more intermediate and was debating between the 143 and 145. But seeing as I want to get into more freestyle, I think I’ll go with 143!

        Any thoughts on bindings that fit the flex of this board? Currently riding burton scribes but looking into Union bindings?

        Reply

        • Nate says

          September 30, 2019 at 12:26 pm

          Hi Jenny

          You’re very welcome.

          The Scribes would match this board well, IMO. But if you wanted to switch to Union’s, then the Juliet or Trilogy would be good options. The Trilogy being the better quality pair, and the Juliet the cheaper option.

          Reply

13. Stephanie says

    April 3, 2019 at 9:31 pm

    Hi Nate,

    I bought my first board/boots/bindings a couple of years ago (with your help) and now that I’m a pretty solid intermediate rider, I’m interested in getting a new board. I live in California and spend most of my time in Tahoe with a few days in Colorado every year. I generally stick to groomers – mainly blues with the occasional black run – and dip into the trees occasionally. My current board is the Burton Genie and I’m considering the Burton Feelgood flying v because I’d really like to work on getting faster and making quicker turns. Other factors that I keep in mind are that I have big feet (I wear a 9.5 in the Burton Starstruck) and that knocked a few boards out of contention when I bought my first board. Do you think that the Feelgood Flying V is a good choice? Any other options I should consider?

    Reply

    • Nate says

      April 4, 2019 at 11:24 am

      Hi Stephanie

      Thanks for your message.

      I think the Feelgood Flying V would be a good step up for and not be too advanced either. Definitely a good solid intermediate option, IMO.

      Looking back on our previous conversation, I would be weighing up between the 149 and 152 size-wise, but probably leaning more towards 149. What size Genie did you end up getting?

      The Feelgood Flying V is still a looser feeling board, but certainly going to be more stable at speed vs the Genie. If you think you’d prefer a slightly more stable feeling, then you could look at something like the:

      – Salomon Rumblefish
      – Rossi Frenemy
      – Capita Paradise

      But if you like that slightly looser kind of feel (without being ultra-loose), then the Flying V would be a great option.

      Hope this gives you more to go off

      Reply

14. Celia says

    March 27, 2019 at 7:11 pm

    Hi Nate,
    Thanks for the great tips! I am a small rider 5′ 3, 108lbs, 22.5cm boots. There is no snow from where I live and I go to Japan for ~10/15 days a year for the last 3 years. I think I am an intermediate level 4 rider, can ride smoothly on red line but not so stable in single black. I have my own boots with rental board for the last 3 years and looking to buy my first full set now.
    From your suggestion, the Capita Paradise is exactly what I need. I like that camber dominant profile with a little bit rocker at the end, I think that type of board will help me progress. But I cannot find a size 141 anywhere, would a 143 too long for me? Also, I have found a size 138&142 Capita Jess Kimura Pro, the size fit but do you think that board would be too stiff for me? (I know it is not a true twin but it is ok I don’t ride switch much, I just want a board which can help me ride all the groomer lines stably). All in all, would you suggest a 143 Paradise or 138, 142 Jess Kimura Pro for me or any other board? Open to suggestions too!
    Thanks,
    Celia

    Reply

    • Nate says

      March 28, 2019 at 1:12 pm

      Hi Celia

      Thanks for your message.

      Size-wise, I think something around 142 would be a great length as an advanced rider. As an intermediate rider, you could drop a little in terms of size. For the Paradise, especially for your boot size, I would prefer to see you on the 141 vs the 143. Not saying it’s going to be massive for you, but ideally I think the 141 would be a better size for you.

      There isn’t really a direct men’s equivalent of the Jess Kimura Pro. In some ways it looks like a softer flexing Black Snowboard of Death. But based on specs, it looks like it’s a similar flex to the Paradise. So I wouldn’t be too concerned about the stiffness, as an intermediate rider. But it does look to have a slightly more aggressive camber profile, with mostly camber to the tail – with a small flat section – and rocker towards the nose only (no rocker in the tail). Based on specs I would say it’s a little more advanced than the Paradise overall, but it still looks intermediate suitable. Certainly more directional than the Paradise, but if you’re not riding much switch or freestyle, then that’s a good thing.

      Size-wise, if you were to go for the Jess Kimura pro, it’s a touch call between the 142 and 138.

      It is a narrower board – so that’s certainly a plus for your boot size, IMO. I haven’t seen a narrower waist on a women’s board than the 223mm on the 138 – and I think that would work well with your boots. But it’s just whether it would be getting a little on the short side for you not. As a beginner, I would say that would be a good size, but since you’re at an intermediate level – and are progressing towards being advanced, in the long term I think the 142 would be the better length – even if with a slightly steeper learning curve to begin with. I think for right now, you would be fine with the 138, but my only thing would be if you were to outgrow it too fast. The width on the 142 would also be fine for your boots.

      Some pros and cons of those sizes:

      – Shorter usually means more nimble, particularly at slower speeds, better for freestyle and better in trees – so the 138 would be better in this sense.
      – Longer usually means more stability at speed and better float in powder – the 142 would be better in this sense

      I would be leaning towards the 142 Jess Kimura Pro for you vs the 143 Paradise and 138 Kimura Pro – but it’s a close call between the 138 and 142.

      Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision

      Reply

15. Wendy says

    March 19, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    A couple other bindings I was looking at aside from the Lexa are the Union Milan, Union Rosa, or Burton Scribe.

    Reply

    • Nate says

      March 20, 2019 at 2:12 pm

      Hi Wendy

      I think the Scribe would work fine on Frenemy/Rumblefish. The Milan might be getting just a touch on the Soft side and the Rosa would be too soft for those boards, IMO.

      If going Union your best bet would be the Trilogy or Legacy – but the Milan would work too – just not quite as good a match.

      Reply

16. Wendy says

    March 19, 2019 at 4:43 pm

    Hi Nate,
    I just got off the scale. Looks like I shaved off 5 lbs from my original post, so I’m 120lbs, if that matters for length size. The Frenemy is a 2017 board size 143. Is it pretty much the same as the 2019 model? With a flex of 5, that won’t make it too surfy of a feel will it? I want to feel sturdy and secure in my board, easy to maneuver and turn, and hold my edge at faster speeds. On my current Burton feather board (2002) I feel like I’m working too hard. The Rumblefish would be a size 144 but the Frenemy fits my budget more.

    I’m open to trying other bindings other than Flows. The other one I was looking at was the Burton Lexa 2018 model, size Medium. Are there other ones out there that you think would work with the Frenemy and Rumblefish?

    Reply

    • Nate says

      March 20, 2019 at 2:11 pm

      Hi Wendy

      That 5lbs shouldn’t matter too much. I would still say about the same in terms of length. As far as I know the 2017 Frenemy’s smallest size is a 144 – but in any case I think that will be fine. The Frenemy, as far as I can tell hasn’t changed at all since then, so basically the same board as the 2019 model.

      Going back to 2002, I can’t find much about that model of Burton Feather. But since it’s 2002 it’s likely that it was traditional camber (all camber) as everything was back then. So in terms of camber profile, the Frenemy will have a more forgiving feel, having rocker in the profile. Could feel a little more surfy in that sense. But if the Feather of 2002 is anything like the recent Feather, then it would have been very soft flexing. So going up to the 5/10 flex of the Frenemy should feel stiffer – and since it’s from 2002 it’s likely to be a noodle by now! So the Frenemy should feel considerably stiffer compared to it, I would guess.

      But if you’re really worried, you could look at something like the Jones Dream Catcher or Jones Twin Sister, which are a little stiffer and have a little more camber in them. Still doable for an intermediate rider, but a little more advanced than most in this list. But certainly very stable feeling boards. The YES Hel Yes would be another option, but the smallest size is a 146, which is just a bit too long for you, IMO.

      In terms of bindings, the Lexa would work on the Frenemy (and the Rumble Fish, Dream Catcher and Twin Sister) – and medium would work size-wise. With size 6 boots you should also be able to fit into smalls as well (though depending on the brand of your boot, the medium might be the safer option). You could also check out:

      >>Top Women’s All-Mountain Bindings

      Note: You probably already know this, but I like to make sure – if you get Burton bindings make sure you get the “Re:Flex” model as their “EST” models only fit on Burton boards.

      Hope this helps

      Reply

17. Wendy says

    March 17, 2019 at 1:40 pm

    Hi Nate!

    This is such a fantastic site. I’ve learned so much! I need your opinion on a board and bindings as I’ve been getting differing recommendations from the guys at the board shops. I would say I’m an intermediate 4 and ride in Ontario, Canada. The runs here are groomers with some icy days. I don’t intend to ride in the park and on occasion I might have some fluffier powder. I have a really old 2002 Burton Feather board and Flo bindings currently. I think it’s time to upgrade to some better technology that will help with my ease of turning and I want something that will hold my edge. Basically I want to feel secure and solid on my board. I plan to ride with my kids who will be learning to board next year so I don’t plan nor do I like to go too fast. Too much speed makes me nervous.

    I got new boots last year: Ride Cadence double Boa and love them so far. The guys at the pro shop recommended the Arbor Swoon rocker but after reading your site I don’t think a rocker board is for me since I want more of a solid, secure ride. I’m thinking I would do best on a hybrid rocker-camber-rocker profile so I am looking at an older 2017 Rossignal Frenemy board. I’m 125lbs and 5’2″. Size 6 boots. What do you think of that board for me? is there a lot of difference from the 2017 to the more recent Frenemy? It’s the end of the season so I’m looking for boards on sale for next season.

    The other board I’m considering is the Rossignal Justice 2018 but I’m worried it might be too stiff? I mentioned 2 Rossignal boards because it uses the Magna traction technology that I think will add to edge holds. Although I’m a wee bit concerned as the pro shop guy said Rossi’s suck and that they are really a skii brand. I don’t know? Will I be frowned upon if I’m riding a Rossignal board?

    Anyhow, onto bindings. Initially I was looking at the Stiletto Burton bindings but now I’m not sure if I should stick to Flow’s since that’s what I’ve been using all along. Can you recommend something for me? Arbor? Union? Burton? or Flow?

    Reply

    • Nate says

      March 18, 2019 at 11:27 am

      Hi Wendy

      Thanks for your message.

      I think the Frenemy would be a great option for you. The Justice would be too stiff for what you’re describing though.

      I don’t want to judge, but sounds like the pro shop guy is a bit pretentious to me – just because Rossi are also a ski brand doesn’t mean they make terrible boards – or that snowboarders will any way look down on you for riding a “ski brand” board. K2 & Salomon also make boards and skis. It’s not that uncommon, and doesn’t make the snowboards worse. Rossi haven’t put a lot of effort into upgrading their boards in recent years, but they still make decent boards. If they continue to just release the same boards, they will start to fall behind, but for now they are still a good option, depending on what you’re looking for. That’s my opinion, anyway.

      Size-wise, I would say only get the Frenemy if you can find it in the 144. Anything longer will be too long for you, IMO. That would be the longest I would go for you.

      Some other really good options for what you’re describing, would be:

      – Salomon Rumblefish 144 (or you could even think about going 140 – the 140 is a little on the shorter side for your specs, but given your boot size, sizing down isn’t a bad idea)

      – YES Emoticon 143

      In terms of bindings. When I first started snowboarding I was in flows, because I liked the idea of that quick entry. But when I changed to other bindings, I was glad I did. Now that was a fair while ago, and Flow isn’t a brand of bindings that I currently test, so I haven’t been on them for many years, so they could well have improved in that time. But I’ve never found that binding in a little slower (and flows are certainly faster) has been a problem – and worth the extra bit of time. Especially if you’re binding in standing up anyway – there’s little in it, IMO. So, definitely not saying don’t go Flow, but trying something new might be a good thing and you might well like the change.

      For something like the Frenemy or Rumble Fish, I would look to get on something a little stiffer than the Stiletto – just because I like to match board and binding flex as much as possible and I would say 5/10 flex for the Frenemy and Rumblefish and more like 3/10 for the Stiletto. The Emoticon is more like 4/10 flex, so that would be a better match if you were to go stiletto. Also, to match the Ride Cadence, a stiffer binding would also work better, IMO.

      Also check out, for more options:

      >>Top Women’s Freestyle Bindings

      >>Top Women’s All-Mountain Bindings

      If you see any other bindings on sale that you think might be suitable, let me know, and I would be happy to give you my opinion.

      Hope this helps

      Reply

    • Julia Mason says

      June 26, 2019 at 2:25 pm

      Hi Nate
      Im hoping you can help. I do most of my riding in Australia where the conditions can be varied. For example, at the moment we havent had any snow for 5 days, but, it’s been really cold (for here anyway): -6C overnight to -2C during the day. Then, in a few days it’s forecast to snow for about 4 days straight! So I could be riding on hard packed ice, fresh snow, snow out of the machines, or slush because despite the cold conditions, it does occaisionally rain!
      I’ve been riding for about 4 seasons (but only about a week each time on the holidays), and I’m a mid-range intermediate. Sometimes I like to adventure off the groomers to practice some fast turns on some bumps, or test myelf on narrow runs, and then other days it’s just the groomers, or something a bit steeper. I do like the adventure of ungroomed slopes I must admit – probably because the groomers can get a little crowded in the holidays as you can imagine. I’m not interested in the park although I do like to practice switch and 360s (not in the air LOL) but only on easy slopes – just for fun.

      I rode the new WHIP (demo) which I really liked but it is directional so I’m a bit concerned – although I understand it should not be a problem unless I want to go to the park. But I cant find any reviews of this board as it’s very new.

      I’ve previously ridden hire boards which tend to be soft and rocker only, or just completely flat. I should be riding a 145-148cm board but last season the hire place only had 155cm so I rode that which was ok.

      I’ve also demo-ed Burton Talent Scout but did not work for me; it just didnt seem to turn as well. I have also demo-ed the Burton Rewind 2019 but found it too soft.

      Should I also consider the GNU B PRO 2020 which has the sintered base. It is a twin but the shape seems the same as the WHIP. The WHIP is not sintered. Is this a problem?
      (On mountain there are no JONES or YES boards to trial, so selection is a bit limited.)….I’ve been reading reviews and perhaps the Twin may have worked as well but it’s not an option to demo.

      So in essence, as there doesnt seem to be any reviews on the WHIP, what do you think of it? Any other views/advice you may have?

      Many thanks from Down Under.
      Julia

      Reply

      • Nate says

        June 28, 2019 at 7:31 am

        Hi Julia

        Thanks for your message.

        Usually I would say something like the WHIP is probably too stiff/too much camber for an intermediate rider, but since you’ve tried it and liked it, then that doesn’t sound like an issue for you. Also, I’ve found GNU boards tend to be softer than what GNU rates them as – especially after breaking them in a bit. So, that’s certainly an option. Being directional is only really a problem if you like to ride switch a lot – and if you were landing/taking off switch a lot for 180s, 540s etc. But if not, then it shouldn’t be an issue. There’s a 148 which sounds like it would fit in your size range (is that the size you demoed?).

        But yeah, if you wanted to go for a twin ride, then the B Pro has the same camber profile, but is a True Twin shape. The sintered base isn’t a deal breaker, but having a sintered base is preferable, usually. If you were getting a lot of slow, sticky snow, then I would say sintered base for sure, but otherwise, it’s not a deal-breaker, but good to have (so long as you’re willing to wax it regularly – the extruded base isn’t as necessary to wax it regularly).

        Another option, if you wanted to go twin, but with a little less camber is the Lib Tech No.43 – also a new board. It’s the closest women’s equivalent to the Lib Tech TRS if you wanted to check out my review on that.

        But like I say, no reason not to go directional necessarily, if you’re not going to be doing a lot of freestyle riding – and given that you rode it and you liked it, the WHIP should certainly be an option.

        Hope this helps with your decision

        Reply

        • Julia Mason says

          June 29, 2019 at 9:44 pm

          Thanks Nate for your comment. The board shop gave me the Capital Jess Kimura Pro to try today – with the moose on it. My daughter spotted it and immediately wanted me to try it!! LOL

          Actually also really liked it. I’ve read some reviews which rate it pretty highly.

          So now I’m a bit stuck now as the Magna traction is supposed to be good on ice – which we can get So I’m wondering if the Capita will do just as well. Unhelpfully it snowed overnight so right now we are on powder!!

          Anyway- any further comments on this Capita board?

          Thanks so much
          Julia

          Reply

          • Nate says

            July 3, 2019 at 3:07 am

            Hi Julia

            Apologies for slow reply – on vacation with limited internet.

            There isn’t an exact men’s equivalent of the Jess Kimura Pro – but it’s quite similar to the BSOD, which is a great board. There isn’t a Capita board that I haven’t liked in good snow. But they don’t tend to be as good in icy snow unfortunately. If you were to only seldom get icy snow, then I’d say you’d be fine so long as you kept your edges sharp, but if you get it a lot, then it’s ideal, IMO.