• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Snowboarding Profiles

  • SNOWBOARDS
    • Top Snowboard Picks 2025-2026
    • Snowboard Reviews
    • Snowboard Buying Guide
    • Snowboard Length Sizing
    • Snowboard Width Sizing
    • For Beginners
    • Setup/Maintenance
  • BINDINGS
    • Top Bindings Picks 2025-2026
    • Binding Reviews
    • Binding Buying Guides
    • Binding Sizing
    • Binding and Board Compatbility
    • For Beginners
    • Bindings Setup
  • SNOWBOARD BOOTS
    • Top Boots Picks 2025-2026
    • Boot Reviews
    • Boot Buying Guides
    • Sizing and Fit
    • Boot Fit by Brand
    • For Beginners
    • More
  • OUTERWEAR
    • Featured Snowboard Jackets 2025-2026
    • Jacket Buying Guide
    • Pants Buying Guide
    • Goggles Buying Guide
    • Helmet Buying Guide
    • Base Layers Buying Guide
    • More
  • About
    • About SP
    • Our Patreon

Bent Metal Joint Bindings Review

Bent Metal Joint Snowboard Bindings Review 2025-2026

Last Updated June 4, 2026 by Nate

Hello and welcome to my Bent Metal Joint snowboard bindings review.

Overall, I found the Joint to be playful, surfy bindings that were easy to ride, had really good slow-speed agility and decent board feel. They weren’t the bindings I’d reach for if I wanted to really charge or lay down aggressive carves, but for mellow, creative riding they were a lot of fun.

In this review I will take a look at the Joint as freestyle snowboard bindings.

As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Joint a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how they compare with other freestyle bindings.

Overall Rating

Bindings: Bent Metal Binding Works (BMBW) Joint

Price: $219 (USD recommended retail)

Style: Freestyle

Flex Rating: Medium (5/10)

Flex Feel: Mid-Soft (4/10)

Rating Score: 80.3/100

Compared to other Men’s freestyle Bindings

Of the 25 current model men's freestyle bindings that we tested:

  • The average score was 84.6/100
  • The highest score was 93.1/100
  • The lowest score was 75.5/100
  • The average price was $309
  • WordPress Responsive Table

    ❄️ The Joint ranked 19th out of 25


    Overview of the Joint’s Specs

    Check out the tables for the Joint’s specs and available sizes.

    Specs

    STYLE:

    Freestyle

    PRICE: 

    $219 - BUYING OPTIONS

    Ability Level: 

    Ability Level Beginner to Intermediate

    flex:

    snowboard Flex 4

    weight:

    FELT normal

    Mounts to: 


    2x4 | 4x4 | Channel

    Sizing

    SIZE 

    US BOOT SIZE

    EURO BOOT SIZE

    MONDO

    S

    5-8

    36.5-40

    23-26

    M

    8-11

    40-44

    26-29

    L

    11-14

    44-48

    29-32

    Who are the Joint Most Suited To?

    The Joint are best suited to riders looking for softer, more playful bindings that prioritize maneuverability, board feel and an easy going overall ride over power and high-speed precision.

    They should work well for beginners and riders who like to cruise, butter around, hit side-hits, slash, ride smaller park features and generally ride with a more creative, relaxed style. They have enough support that they don’t feel completely loose or unsupportive, but they certainly still lean more playful than locked-in.

    They would be best matched to softer to mid-flexing boards, particularly boards in that 3/10 to 5/10 flex range. I wouldn’t personally pair them with something stiff or aggressive, because they didn’t feel like they’d have the power or stability to make the most of that kind of board.

    They should work for beginner to intermediate riders, and also more advanced riders who wanted something forgiving and surfy rather than something super responsive and powerful.


    Test/review details for the Joint

    Bent Metal Joint 2025-2026 On Snow Testing

    O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Joint are capable of.

    Demo Info

    Binding: Bent Metal Joint, M

    Date: February 25, 2025

    TESTING Conditions:

    Overhead: Overcast with periods of light snow and rain. 

    Visibility: Variable 65%-80%

    °C °C +wind chill °F °F rounded °F +wind chill °F WC rounded °C | °F ° +wind chill
    Morning Temp: 0 0 32 32 32 32 0°C | 32°F 0°C | 32°F
    Afternoon Temp: 1 -1 33.8 34 30.2 30 1°C | 34°F -1°C | 30°F
    cm inch in rounded cm inch
    24 hr snowfall: 18 7.0866 7 18cm 7”
    48 hr snowfall: 18 7.0866 7 18cm 7”
    7 day snowfall: 26 10.2362 10 26cm 10”
    kph mph mph rounded kph mph
    Morning Wind: 5 3.1075 3 5kph 3mph
    Afternoon Wind: 10 6.2150 6 10kph 6mph
    WordPress Responsive Table

    On groomer:  Fresh on top and a fairly good layer. Still some good untouched spots right on groomer and plenty off groomer. Middles of groomed runs was messy tracked pow, particularly towards the end. Deep enough that you couldn't feel the compact snow underneath in most places. 

    Off groomer: Fresh pow! Plenty of untracked, even later on in the day and naturally some well tracked areas. 

    Powder wasn't super wet/heavy. But not super Light and fluffy either. Wouldn't describe it as concrete but not super dry - a little bit wet. Was it's driest first thing and got wetter/stickier towards end, particularly lower down. 

    Set Up & Measurements

    Bindings angles: +18/-9
    mm in mm in
    Stance Width: 560 22.0472 22.05 560mm 22.05”
    Footbed Length: 246 9.6850 9.7 246mm 9.7”
    Footbed Length Fully Extended n/a 0 0 n/amm 0”
    Baseplate Length 237 9.3307 9.3 237mm 9.3”
    Highback Height: 207 8.1496 8.1 207mm 8.1”
    Rider Height: 6"0" 183cm
    Rider Weight: 180lbs 82kg
    Boots Tested With: US10 K2 Overdraft
    Board Tested With: YES Greats 156
    Control Bindings: Burton Malavita, M
    grams lbs & ozs
    Binding Weight: 900 1.9841 0.9841 1 16 900g* 1lbs 16ozs* 15.7460
    Average Men's Binding Weight: 938 2.0679 0.0679 2 1 938g** 2lbs 1ozs** 1.0864
    WordPress Responsive Table

    * for one binding, including screws and disc. 

    **based on a sample size of 130+ bindings models that we’ve weighed in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 & 2026 models. 

    I tested the Joint in conditions that made a couple of things a little harder to judge properly. Shock absorption and ollie power, in particular, were a bit tricky to fully assess because of the snow conditions.

    But even with that, I was able to get a good feel for the overall personality of the binding, especially in terms of flex, board feel, maneuverability and overall response.

    Comparisons

    We had the Bent Metal Transfer, Axtion, Logic, and Lightning Supermatic, YES Drive and IPO and Jones Mercury FASE bindings on hand when doing the in-house testing for the Joint. For the on-snow test, we rode this on the same day as we rode the Bent Metal Logic and the YES IPO. Part of this review will involve comparisons to some of the bindings mentioned.  

    Naturally we also had my control bindings (Burton Malavita) on hand for in-house testing and for the on-snow test, used during the control laps.

    Mounting

    Mounting and general setup was pretty straightforward.

    One small thing I really liked - and this applied to most of the Bent Metal bindings I tested, apart from the Lightning Supermatic - was the removable footbed. You could take the whole footbed off and whack it against your leg to get the snow off.

    It sounds like a tiny detail, and it is – and it’s certainly not something that would be a deal breaker or anything, but I liked it. There weren’t screws or small parts on it that felt like they were going to disappear into the snow, and it made clearing snow out of the binding really easy.

    That kind of thing didn’t make or break the ride, obviously, but it was one of those practical little features that I appreciated.

    Flex

    In Hand

    In hand, the Joint felt like one of the softer, more playful Bent Metal bindings I had around.

    The highback twist flex was super flexy. Along with the Logic, it had one of the easiest twisting highbacks of the Bent Metal bindings I tested. It didn’t take much effort to twist it, and that lined up with the surfy/playful feel I got on snow.

    The highback pullback flex had a bit more give than something like the Transfer or Axtion, which felt like they had pretty much no pullback flex. It wasn’t crazy floppy or anything like that, but it had more movement there than the stiffer/more supportive models.

    The ankle strap felt softer than the Lightning Supermatic’s ankle strap as well as vs the Mercury FASE and my control bindings, but stiffer than the Transfer Axtion and Logic’s ankle straps. But it definitely didn’t feel like a really stiff, locked-in strap or anything. About average.

    The toe strap was actually quite stiff compared to the rest of the Bent Metal lineup I had on hand. Of the ones I was comparing, the Joint’s toe strap felt the stiffest, just ahead of the Jones Mercury FASE, Lightning Supermatic, Axtion, Burton Malavita (my control bindings), Transfer and Logic.

    On Snow

    On snow, the Joint felt mid-soft overall. It felt really similar overall to the IPO in terms of flex.

    The ride feel was forgiving and playful. There was enough support that it didn’t feel like I was riding something overly soft or sloppy, but it still leaned clearly to the playful side rather than the powerful/aggressive side.

    Responsiveness

    The Joint were really good at slower speeds. Edge-to-edge transitions felt quick and easy, and they helped to make things very easy to maneuver when I was riding slower or making tighter turns. They had that surfy, easy-going feel that made them nice for slower, more playful riding.

    Compared to the Logic, I’d say the Joint maybe weren’t quite as good for slow-speed agility - but they were very close. The Logic had just that little bit more of an ultra-easy feel. But the Joint still felt really maneuverable and easy to work with.

    At higher speeds, they weren’t as strong. They were better than the Logic for carves and stability at speed, but they still weren’t great in that area overall.

    Carving

    When I pushed them harder, they didn’t have the same level of support or drive as something stiffer. They could handle some speed and some carving, but they weren’t the kind of binding that encouraged me to really lean into big, aggressive carves or charge through rougher snow.

    Compared to the Logic, I would say the Joint were a little better for carving and stability at speed. They had a bit more support and composure when I pushed them.

    But compared to more responsive bindings, they still felt limited. They weren’t ideal for really driving into carves, especially at higher speeds. They could handle mellow to moderate carves fine, but they didn’t give me that locked-in, powerful, confidence-building feeling I’d want for aggressive carving.

    So, if carving was a casual part of your riding, they were fine. If carving was a major priority, I’d look at something stiffer and more supportive.

    Board Feel / Butterability

    Board feel was a strong point. I felt like the Joint had better board feel than the IPO. Not by a massive amount, but noticeable enough that they felt more natural underfoot and a little more connected to the board.

    Compared to the Logic, I would say the Logic had a touch better board feel, but the Joint were close. They had that similar surfy feeling and didn’t feel like they were muting the board too much.

    The overall feel was forgiving and playful enough that presses/butters felt natural, and I didn’t feel like I was fighting the binding.

    Pop / Ollie Power

    Ollie power was hard to judge properly because of the conditions.

    Nothing stood out as being especially powerful or especially weak. They didn’t feel like bindings that were going to massively boost pop, but they also didn’t feel like they were taking anything away.

    Shock Absorption

    Shock absorption was also hard to judge properly on the day. I didn’t get a strong enough feel to say they were amazing or poor in this area. Nothing felt overly harsh, but the conditions didn’t really give me the clearest test for chatter, harder landings or firmer snow.

    Based on the ride feel, they didn’t feel ultra-damp or super cushioned, but they also didn’t feel jarring. I’d put them somewhere around average, with the caveat that I’d want more time in rougher/firmer conditions to be more confident there.

    Ankle Support

    Ankle support felt decent, but not amazing. I would say it was maybe a touch worse than the IPO, but a touch better than the Logic. So, it sat somewhere in that middle zone: supportive enough for playful freestyle/all-mountain freestyle riding, but not something I’d describe as really locked in.

    The strap had more structure than the Logic, which helped this area, but overall still had that softer, surfier feel. If you liked a more locked-down, powerful feel, the Joint probably wouldn’t give you enough support.

    But if you liked a little more freedom and a forgiving feel, while still having enough support to ride around the mountain, they hit a nice balance.

    Weight

    Weight felt very similar to the other Bent Metal bindings I was testing around the same time.

    They didn’t feel noticeably heavy on the lift or on snow. They also didn’t stand out as super light. Just normal, really.

    Entry / Exit

    Entry and exit was simple and straightforward.

    The straps did what they needed to do, and I didn’t have any issues getting in and out. The easily removable footbed design was the most notable practical feature, just because it made clearing snow out of the binding so easy.


    Score Breakdown and Final Verdict

    Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.

    FACTOR Rating (/5) weighting total score weighted rounded score
    Weighted
    Board Feel 4 20 16 16/20
    Shock Absorption 4 20 16 16/20
    Carving 3 15 9 9/15
    Slow Speed Response 4 15 12 12/15
    Adjustability 3.5 10 7 7/10
    Comfort 4 10 8 8/10
    Ankle Support 3.5 5 3.5 3.5/5
    Entry/Exit 4 5 4 4/5
    TOTAL (after normalizing):94 80.3191 80.3 80.3/100
    WordPress Responsive Table

    Overall, I found the Bent Metal Joint to be playful, surfy, easy-going bindings that were at their best when riding slower, getting creative and keeping things mellow.

    They had really good slow-speed agility, good board feel and a forgiving overall ride. They felt better than the Logic for carving and speed stability, but still weren’t something I’d choose for hard charging or aggressive carving.

    Compared to the IPO, the Joint felt similar in flex, maybe a little less supportive at the ankle, but with better board feel. Compared to the Logic, the Joint weren’t quite as agile or quite as strong in board feel, but they were a little more stable and supportive.

    So, I’d see the Joint as a good option for riders who wanted something playful and freestyle-friendly, but with just a touch more support and stability than the softest/surfiest options. Also a great option for beginners.

    Not the best choice for aggressive riders, big carvers or anyone who wanted a really locked-in feel, but a fun binding for cruising, playing around, buttering, side-hits and all-mountain freestyle riding.


    More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online

    If you want to learn more about the Joint, are ready to buy or want to research prices and availability, check out the links below.




    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at evo.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at blauerboardshop.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at tactics.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2025 at the-house.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at evo.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2025 at prfo.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at blue-tomato.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at evo.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at blauerboardshop.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at tactics.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2025 at the-house.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at evo.com
    >>Bent Metal Joint 2025 at prfo.com
    WordPress Responsive Table


    >>Bent Metal Joint 2026 at blue-tomato.com
    WordPress Responsive Table

    Bent Metal Joint Bindings 2026

    If you want to see how the Joint compares to other men’s freestyle bindings or want to check out some other options in that category, check out the next link.

    Our Top Rated Freestyle Bindings
    Share 0
    Post 0
    Pin 0

    Category Links: 2026 Snowboard Bindings Reviews| BMBW| Current Model| Men's Freestyle Binding reviews Tags: Bent Metal Joint 2025-2026| Bent Metal Joint Review

    About Nate

    Nate is passionate about and loves learning new things everyday about snowboarding, particularly the technical aspects of snowboarding gear. That, and becoming a better rider and just enjoying and getting the most out of life.

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Footer

    Follow Snowboarding Profiles

    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Recent Comments

    • Nate on Capita Aeronaut Snowboard Review
    • Nate on YES Standard Snowboard Review
    • Bernis Smith on Capita Aeronaut Snowboard Review

    Snowboardingprofiles.com participates in affiliate programs and may earn commissions on products linked to on this site.  More Details

    Snowboardingprofiles.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

    Copyright © 2014–2026 · SnowboardingProfiles.com

    back-to-top
    • Home
    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact
    Bent Metal Joint Bindings 2026