Hello and welcome to my Union Atlas bindings review.
In this review, I will take a look at the Atlas as all-mountain-freeride snowboard bindings.
As per tradition here at SnowboardingProfiles.com I will give the Atlas a score out of 100 (based on several factors) and see how they compare with other all-mountain-freeride bindings.
Overall Rating
Binding: Union Atlas 2024
Price: $369
Style: All-Mountain-Freeride
Flex Rating: Stiff (8/10)
Flex Feel on Snow: Medium-Stiff (7/10)
Rating Score: 85.6/100
Compared to other Men’s All-Mountain-Freeride Bindings
Out of the 20 men’s all-mountain-freeride bindings that I rated:
Overview of the Atlas’s Specs
Check out the tables for the Atlas’s specs and available sizes.
Specs
STYLE:
ALL-MOUNTAIN-FREERIDE
PRICE:
$369
Ability Level:
flex:
weight:
Felt normal
Mounts to:
2x4 | 4x4 | Channel
Sizing
SIZE | US BOOT SIZE | EURO BOOT SIZE | UK BOOT SIZE |
---|---|---|---|
S | 5.5-7.5 | 37-40.5 | 4.5-6.5 |
M | 8-10 | 41-43 | 7-9 |
L | 10.5-13 | 43.5-46 | 9.5-12 |
Who is the Atlas Most Suited To?
The Atlas is best suited to anyone looking for a stiffer than average binding that provides good support and carveability while at the same time rides well when riding slower/more casual.
Best matched to boards in the 5/10 to 8/10 flex range and even more ideal for that 6/10 to 7/10 flex range, IMO.
The Atlas in More Detail
O.k. let’s take a more detailed look at what the Atlas are capable of.
Demo Info
Binding: Union Atlas 2024, M
Date: March 16, 2023
Conditions
Sunny, barely a cloud in the sky. Perfect visibility.
Temperature was -1°C (30°F) and -6°C (21°F) with wind, in the morning and 2°C (36°F), which was -2°C (28°F) with wind, in the afternoon. NW winds 5kph (3mph) morning and afternoon.
24 hour snow: 0" (0cm)
48 hour snow: 2" (5cm)
7 day snow: 16" (41cm)
On groomer: Hard pack but not icy. Overall really quite nice. And fast.
Off groomer: Doable but not ideal. Hard and crunchy.
Set Up
Bindings angles: +15/-15
Stance width: 560mm (22″)
Board tested with: Lib Tech Terrain Wrecker
Boots tested with: Adidas Response ADV, size US9.5
Footbed length: 24.5cm (9.7”)
Footbed Length Fully Extended: 25.5cm (10”)
Baseplate Length (underside): 23cm (9.1")
Highback Height: 20.8cm (8.2”)
Weight: 1020 grams (2lbs, 4oz)
* for one binding, including screws and disc. The average weight of a small sample size of around 80 bindings (2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 & 2024 models) I have weighed is 920 grams (2lbs). So the Atlas were heavier than average on scales, but on snow they felt normal weight-wise.
Flex
I had the Atlas FC, Atlas Pro, Force, Force Classic and Strata with me to test, so I was able to compare against all of them, plus the Burton Malavita (my control bindings).
In Hand: In terms of high-back twist, they are what you'd expect vs the other Union bindings in the line. They had a little more twist flex than the Atlas FC and Atlas Pro but not as much twist as the Force and Force New. They were pretty similar to the Strata in terms of twist flex. There was virtually no pull back flex, but just a touch more than the Atlas FC. About the same as the Atlas Pro, which was very very little. Vs the Malavita there was a touch more twist in the Atlas' high-back, but pretty close (note that the Malavita has quite a stiff high-back but softer baseplate).
Ankle strap flex is a little flexier than all of the Atlas FC, Atlas, Force New, Force Classic, Strata and Malavita. They weren't ultra flexy or anything, but the flexiest of all that I had with me.
The toe strap's flex was stiffer than on the Atlas FC, Atlas Pro and Force New and very similar to the Strata, Force Classic and Malavita.
On Snow: Overall they felt stiffer than medium, but very similar to other bindings I've ridden with 7/10 flex. I think the 8/10 flex rating they get is a little exaggerated and I would say they're right there at that 7/10 flex mark on snow.
Responsiveness
On a higher speed carve, there was more stability and could carve a little harder vs the Malavita, but not quite as good as the Atlas Pro.
In terms of slower speed agility, they were very close to the Malavita. If I had to choose I'd say the Malavita were a little better, but not much in it. They were quite noticeably better at slow speeds than the Atlas Pro.
The response feel is a nice even, consistent smooth, predictable feel.
Board Feel/Butterability
Not quite as good as Malavita in terms of board feel but still decently good. This is likely aided by the quite hard, not very padded footbed. Very similar to the Atlas Pro in terms of board feel, but the Atlas, just a hair better in terms of tweaking and buttering.
Pop/Ollie Power
Popping ollies or popping off rollers/jumps was easier to initiate vs the Atlas Pro, with a similar amount of overall power. Very similar in terms of power as the Malavitas but not quite as easy to initiate, but very close.
Adjustability
The Atlas have really good adjustability. Most things are adjustable on this binding.
Heel Cup: Yes - which is great for boot centering.
Stance Width: Micro adjustments possible - can run disc horizontal and that allows micro stance width adjustments. And given you can use the heel cup for boot centering, you're pretty much always going to be able to run the disc horizontal, as the only advantage of running the disc vertical is to adjust for boot centering.
Highback Lean: Yes and tool-less
Ankle Strap Position: No
Toe Strap Position: Yes - 2 position options
Ankle and toe strap length: Tool-less
Gas pedal/toe ramp extension: Yes - a 1cm range.
Highback Rotation: Yes - 2 position options
Compatible with: 2 x 4 | 4 x 4 | Channel
Shock Absorption
Footbed Thickness: 2.1cm toe and 2cm heel (on one side then 2.2cm toe and 2.1cm heel on other side) – some subtle canting there. There’s padding in the toe and heel, but it’s very hard, not cushy at all. That probably helps with board feel, but not shock absorption.
On Snow: They didn't absorb shock absorption as well as my control bindings. Quite noticeably down. Nothing terrible - but a step down. Felt very similar to the Atlas Pro, which in turn felt very similar to the Atlas FC.
Entry/Exit
Ratchets are nice and smooth. Not the smoothest ever, but as smooth as you'd ever need them. No issues unstrapping on the move, approaching chairlift.
Comfort
Good comfort overall. Not a lot of cush in the footbed, but otherwise very comfortable.
Ankle Strap: Felt really nice, conformed well and no pressure points.
Toe Strap: Ditto ankle strap.
Canted Footbed: Yes, subtly.
Padded Footbed: Some padding but quite hard/solid feel.
Highback: Minimal padding but felt good riding. No calf-bite.
Ankle Support
Ankle support was good. Felt very similar to the Atlas Pro and the Malavita.
Score Breakdown and Final Verdict
Check out the breakdown of the score in the table below.
RATING | SCORE WEIGHTING | |
---|---|---|
CARVING | 4.0 | 20/25 |
SLOW SPEED RESPONSE | 4.0 | 8/10 |
ADJUSTABILITY | 4.5 | 13.5/15 |
ANKLE SUPPORT | 4.0 | 12/15 |
BOARD FEEL | 4.0 | 8/10 |
SHOCK ABSORPTION | 3.5 | 7/10 |
COMFORT | 4.0 | 8/10 |
ENTRY/EXIT | 4.0 | 4/5 |
TOTAL after normalizing | 85.6/100 |
Overall, the Atlas are really solid bindings without any weaknesses. They are a good mid-stiff binding that can take you anywhere you want to go and are overall just great quality and feel good for both carving and slower speed riding.
More Info, Current Prices and Where to Buy Online
If you’re interested in Union’s Atlas bindings, are ready to buy or want to research current prices or availability, check out the links below.
If you want to check out some other all-mountain-freeride type bindings or want to compare the Atlas to others, check out the next link.
Nick says
Hi Nate,
I currently am riding a ’16 GNU riders choice and honestly I love this board. I currently have some older 390 BOSS that have been my staple but I am looking for something more stiff and definitely lighter. Currently most of my riding is fairly speed/carving oriented. I am typically only on groomers, natural side hits, butters etc (as I live in the east ‘ice’ coast. But I would like to get into more tree and powder type runs. As are most people, I am stuck between the Falcor and the Atlas. While the new bindings would go on my GNU I am considering getting a YES Optimistic toward the end of the season.
Do you recommend I go with the falcor or atlas? nd does this opinion change if the bindings are being put on the YES optmistic?
Thanks
Nick
Nate says
Hey Nick
Thanks for your message.
I would be leaning Falcor, mostly because you mention side-hits and butters. I prefer the mini-disc and the extra board feel of the Falcor for doing those kinds of things. But if what you’re looking for is more of a smooth/predictable carving feel and that’s more important to you than butters/side-hits etc, then the Atlas might be your best bet. I find the biggest difference between the two, in overall personality, is that the Falcor provides a bit more an explosive/springy turn feeling and better board feel, with the Atlas being a smoother, more consistent turn feeling, all else being equal.
With the Optimistic, I think typically something like the Atlas, if you’re looking to most carve/cruise/find powder with it. But if you’re thinking more tight tree runs, then I like the feel of the Falcor for that, personally.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision
Marwin says
Hi Nate,
I am thinking of buying the Union Atlas or the Burton Cartel X for my new Libtech Terrain Wrecker. I am currently riding a deep thinker with a Burton Malavita, but I am looking for a stiffer binding to go with both boards. What do you think? Or are there any other alternatives I should consider? Thanks a lot for your help!
Nate says
Hi Marwin
Thanks for your message.
Any of the 3 would work for sure on those two boards. They are at the upper end of stiffness for the Terrain Wrekcer, IMO, but certainly not out of range – not so stiff that it should make it too twitchy or anything, I wouldn’t think. And they should be a good flex-match to the Deep Thinker (what year is your Deep Thinker by the way?).
If you’re looking for more board feel and connection with the board that allows for more natural flex of the board, then I’d be leaning Falcor or Cartel X (more similar feel to the Malavita in terms of board feel). If you want a stronger connection with the board and a smoother feel, then I’d go Atlas. I find I prefer something with more board feel for things like ollies, short/sharp turns and butters etc. But if you’re looking for more of a smooth, flowing feel for bigger, smooth carves, then something with more connection, like the Atlas tends to work better.
Hope this gives you more to go off for your decision.
Marwin says
Hi Nate,
thanks for the quick reply and sorry for double posting my question.
I have the Deep Thinker from 2018 (the one with the fish on the bottom).
I can currently get the Union Atlas for a good price, so my decision will probably be on that.
As an alternative, what do you think of the Rome Katana/D.O.D. or the Bataleon Astro. In my opinion, these are also interesting alternatives.
Thanks for the help and always great reviews. Keep up the good work!
Nate says
Hi Marwin
The Katana would be a really good option, IMO. We haven’t tested the DOD but on paper it should work too.
I think the Astro would be a little too stiff for the Terrain Wrecker though. It would work on your Deep Thinker, but a little too stiff (imo) for the TW.
Marwin says
Thanks a lot! Maybe the Asym Astro, which seems to be less stiff (flex 7).
Nate says
Hey Marwin
Yes, the asym wrap version (didn’t think of that) is supposed to be a little mellower (we’ve only tested the full wrap version). So I think that could work too for sure. I had tunnel vision on the version we got on!
Nick says
Hi Nate! Thanks for all the awesome reviews! They’ve really helped me narrow down on gear.
Right now I currently have a capita mercury 159 and looking to upgrade my bindings. I got it narrowed down to the union falcors, union atlas, and the burton cartel x. When I ride I usually love to speed down groomers and make some tree runs when I can. Do you have any suggestions on which I should be leaning more towards or if I should take a look at another binding?
Nate says
Hi Nick
Thanks for your message. All 3 of those should work well with the Mercury and you can’t make a bad choice between them, IMO. If you’re planning on doing ollies, butters etc as well, then I would be leaning Falcor or Cartel X as I find they have better board feel for those kinds of things. If not, then the Atlas is a really good bet. The Atlas has a smoother, more consistent, even response vs something like the Falcor, which has a more springy/explosive kind of response, if that makes sense, so depending on which you prefer the sound of might be the difference between them. Response from the Cartel X is kind of in between those two expalanations in terms of feel, IMO.
Hope this helps with your decision
Kerry says
Hi Nate! Thanks for all your reviews, they are super helpful. What are your thoughts on pairing the atlas with the Jones Frontier board? I usually go to Winter Park and spend most of my time jumping off the groomers trying to find POW in the trees. If not the atlas, what would you recommend? Thanks a million!
Nate says
Hi Kerry
Thanks for your message. I think the Atlas will match well to the Frontier. Lots of other options that will also match well, but the Atlas are a good bet, IMO.
Kyle says
Hi Nate,
Great review! Like many others, I am struggling to make a decision between the Atlas’ and the Falcors. My standard riding style would lead me more toward the Atlas’ but I’m wondering if the Falcors (or another binding) would be better for my setup. I have a very unique board: K2 Fastplant (2010). It’s more of a park board but I use it on groomers, in the trees, in powder, etc. I would like to create more of an all-mountain board but don’t want to rig something up that just doesn’t make sense. For what it’s worth, I currently have Rome SDS 390 bindings (2011). Any help on this would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Nate says
Hi Kyle
Thanks for your message.
I would be leaning Atlas. Typically I would be thinking Falcor for the Fastplant, between the two (though I would actually go with a softer binding on it, ideally), but in your case, for your riding style, I think the Atlas is probably the better bet. My biggest concern would be, with either Falcor or Atlas, is that they could make the board a little twitchy, with the Fastplant being a softer board, sometimes when you pair a soft board with stiffer bindings, it can get a little twitchy.
Hope this helps
Ryan says
Hi Nate! I have a 2023 capita bsod 159 and paired it with 2023 medium union atlas bindings. I wear a 2022 burton photon boa wide boot in size 10. Do you think I made the right decision for medium over large bindings? I have the bindings centered but the toe and heel has more overhang than I’m used to vs my old bent metal transfers in medium. Not sure if a size large would be too big? I have the medium extended all the way out with the heel cup and and will have to do the opposite with the large. From what I’ve been reading, Medium atlas fit size 8-10 and large 10.5 and up. My existing boot is supposed to be low profile and the toe strap is on the last setting extended all the way out. Please let me know what you think? I appreciate your time and look forward to your reply.
Nate says
Hi Ryan
Thanks for your message.
I tend to prefer going on the smaller option – so whilst you might fit in the L, I would stick with the Medium. A little bit of boot overhang over the bindings is all good and personally I prefer the fit of being on the big end for a medium than being on the small end for a large. Have you adjusted the heel cup on the Atlas? If you move the heel cup back, that might allow you to have the toe strap not on the last hole. That said, if it fits well on the last hole, then there’s no issues with it being on that – and also if you have good boot centering in terms of heel and toe overhang on the board, then it wouldn’t necessarily make sense to move the heel cup back. But if you have a little more toe overhang, then it’s a good idea to move the heel cup back (if you haven’t already).
Hope this helps
Ryan says
Thank you for your quick reply Nate. Yes, I moved the heel up all the way back and the boot is completely centered with equal toe
and heel. About 1.5-2” overhang on the heel and toe. Just the toe strap is on the last hole and all the toe straps are moved towards the front or toe side of the binding since you can adjust the strap setting by pushing down and pulling up into 3 different positions to make it fit over the toe better. I made all the possible adjustments and just want to be sure since I can easily exchange for the size large. I’ll stick with the medium. I appreciate your knowledge and advice. Hope you have a great season
Nate says
Hey Ryan
Yeah, I think you should be good – does sound like you’re fully maxed out on it, but as long as you have the toe strap in a good position I think it’ll be fine. Hope you have a great season too!
David says
Hi Nate,
I have 157 decks (254 waist width), and 10.5 Vans infuse boots.
Is Atlas size L a good choice? Is footbed size ok with the deck waist width? Or is large size safe?
I found some reviews that Medium may be ok with 10.5 boots.
I am not sure which size I need to pick.
Thanks,
David
Nate says
Hi David
Thanks for your message.
Hard to say for sure, as I haven’t measured an L Atlas before. I measured the M at 24.4cm on the top of the footbed, with the gas pedal not extended – and then down to 22.7cm on the bottom of the baseplate. Based on other Union bindings that I’ve measured, the L will likely be around 26.4cm with no gas pedal extension on the footbed and around 24.7cm on the underside of the baseplate.
Assuming your boards is around 264mm at the inserts, then you’ll likely be OK with the L on them.
In terms of fitting the Vans Infuse 10.5s into an M, I think you’d get them in. No guarantees because I haven’t tried that exact combination. But had a bit of leeway with 10s in the M, so I’d guess that it’s fine but can’t say for sure.
Hope this gives you a little more to go off
Jakub says
Hi Nate,
Do you think Atlas is a good choice for T.Rice Pro board? I was going to get a Terrain Wrecker bit ended up with Travis board (better core, base and graphics). I have a good deal for the Spring Break version of atlas and I am a bit worried that it could be too stiff for all around riding. Also the spring break has some strap upgrades over regular Atlas.
Thanks!
Nate says
Hi Jakub
Assuming the overall stiffness of the spring break version (which I haven’t tested) is the same as the regular version, I think they should work well on the T.Rice Pro. I felt the Atlas at around a 7/10 flex and the T.Rice Pro around 6.5/10, so they’re a good flex match together, IMO. And in terms of all-round riding, unless you’re doing a lot of slow riding or a lot of creative freestyle/park stuff, I wouldn’t say they’re too stiff.
Nick says
Hey Nate,
Thanks for all the reviews, they are very very helpful.
Currently riding 2022 NS Snowtrooper 159 (5’10”/190lbs/10 Burton photon BOA)
I have Union Atlas in medium from 2020-2021 but looking for slightly softer bindings specifically in union lineup. Doing less freeride than I thought when bought this board, and don’t have that much powder in Tremblant, got more into glades when good conditions, small/medium jump, side hits and groomers.
1) is that 159 big for what kind of boarding I’m doing (considering my weight)?
2) would strata be a good choice?
3)is atlas too stiff for ST flex and camber style?
4)is it worth the switch?
5)passed up on ride algorythm 157. Bad move?
Nate says
Hi Nick
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t ridden the Algorythm but from what I know of the board, I think the Snowtrooper is a better bet for how you’re describing your riding. I think you’re good in the 159, assuming at least a solid intermediate level. I wouldn’t go longer than that for what you’re doing, but I think you’re good to stick with that. You could go a little shorter, but it’s not what I would call too big.
The Strata would be a good match – as would the new Union Ultra. I felt the Snowtrooper at a 4/10 flex and the Ultra at a 5/10 flex and the Strata at 6/10. So, IMO the Ultra is the best match. The Atlas, at a 7/10 flex by my feel is a bit too stiff for that board, IMO. The Strata is the stiffest I’d put on it, but still in a good range.
Yeah, I would say it’s worth the switch, IMO.
Hope this helps with your decision
Nicholas Sisti says
Hi Nate,
Thanks for the response.
I think 158 cm is perfect To be honest (learned to board on a NS SL 158). You’re not first the person I see rate the NS ST closer to 4/10 (although NS claims it’s 5/10).
I did look at the Ultra’s but not crazy about the toe strap. I like the more web/hexagonal-style strap pattern the Strata has (more grip) especially since I sometimes have issues with my Atlas toe strap staying gripped on my boot.
– What would you say is the stiffest board you should use with Strata?
-If not in Union, do you have another few options of bindings ?
Thanks again!
Nate says
Hi Nick
The stiffest board I would use the Strata on would be a 7/10 flex. The softest board I would use it on would be a 4/10 flex. So they’d certainly work on the ST, IMO. And if you’re used to the Atlas on it, then they should feel noticeably softer.
Not from Union, the following would be good bets. I’m taking into account that you’ll be incorporating the likes of side hits etc and that you’ll want decent board feel and decent shock absorption (flex in brackets):
– Strata – has to be mentioned because they should work well
– Burton Malavita (5.5/10)
– Burton Genesis (5.5/10)
– Burton Mission (5/10)
– K2 Line Up (4/10)
Ethan says
Hey Nate. Thanks for all the reviews. I’m looking for new bindings and was considering the new Atlas after the remodel (had a pair in 2018 but didn’t like them. Trying to switch from my Burton Cartels. To be clear, I love my Cartels! I love having board feel and Burton bindings give the best board feel IMHO. The problem – I can’t center my boots on the board and ride the stance I prefer. I like to ride a narrower stance (21 inches). With cartels, I have to either center the bindings on board (which means my stance ends up to wide or too narrow), or ride with my heels dragging since there’s no heel cup adjustability on the Burtons. I have a knee issue and I’m old (lol), so really need to dial my stance in or I will be in pain, lol. I also ride lots of boards (10+ board quiver), which is another reason I need the adjustability. I saw you gave the Atlas a 3.5 on board feel and a 4.0 for the cartels. Would it be worth considering these an an alternative? If not, are there any bindings that offer the same or close level of board feel and allow me to adjust stance and center my boot on board? I’ve ridden Union Stratas and Falcons, but don’t like them unfortunately. Would anything get me the board feel I get from Cartels or close to it? Thanks!
Nate says
Hi Ethan
The Atlas could work, but I think you’d probably miss some board feel. And yes, they are different to what they used to be, but they’re not any better board feel-wise, IMO. And still a very similar personality. I’ve also replied to your comment on the Cartel review, and I think the Rome Katana could suit you well – more details on the reply over there.
Stephen says
Hi Nate,
I have 2 boards terrain wrecker and the yes greats. I have the union stratas and I want to purchase another pair of bindings. I want to put the stratas on my terrain wrecker and get new bindings for my greats. What’s do you suggest.
Im 5,8 195lbs and size 8 boots.
Jon says
Hi Nate,
Appreciate all the work you do for these reviews. Very helpful with what I purchase.
I have a few boards that I need your suggestions for and they are the following:
2022 yes greats 154 – all mountain / park
2021 asymulator 154 – all mountain (when I wanna change up from riding the greats). I feel this spins better than the greats.
2022 libtech orca 153 – all mountain / tree / pow
I’m in a toss up on what to throw on each of the boards.
-Union strata 2022
-Union falcor 2022
-Union atlas 2022
-Union force pro 2022 (with falcor straps and team high back)
My specs are 5’7” / 170 lbs / size 9 adidas tactical / advanced rider but I mostly mess around all mountain (70% all mountain 30% park)
Which binding would you throw on each board and why? I have been riding the stratas for two full seasons now and I pretty much threw it on all my boards but I’m tired of moving the bindings. Id rather just marry the right binding to the right board now.
Thanks! Looking forward to your suggestions for me.
Nate says
Hi Jon
Thanks for your message.
I would go:
Greats with Falcor
Asymulator with Strata
Orca with Atlas
You could certainly also put the Atlas on the Greats and Falcor on the Orca. But I like the board feel more from the Falcor for something you’re going to be riding freestyle, like the Greats. I often pair my Greats with Falcors and love that setup. The Orca, for me is a board I don’t feel need as much board feel for, because it’s not something I’m going to be buttering or doing ollies on as much – and the smoother response of the Atlas would work better with the style of riding I’d be doing on the Orca. The Asymulator, from my experience is the softest of the 3, in my experience, so the softest bindings make the most sense on it, IMO. Also, because the Asymulator is something I’d also be doing freestyle stuff on, the extra board feel of the Strata comes into play there as well.
Hope this helps
Jon says
I actually agree with those pairings 100%
I read that the 2021/2022 asymulator has been stiffened up a little bit compared to the original one. The flex scale according to capita even says that they beefed it up a little bit. I’m not sure if that’s true as I haven’t ridden the original asymulator.
Do you know if this is true? If so would the beefed up asymulator almost be the same overall flex of the current greats?
I am going to be returning my force pros because I feel like the strata/atlas/falcor overall are definitely in their own world of amazing. Union makes such good bindings it makes it difficult to choose but that’s a good thing right? Lol
Nate says
Hi Jon
I wasn’t aware they’d beefed up, or made any changes to the Asymulator from the 20/21 model to the 21/22 model. I was wondering if I’d missed something (I compare specs when the new catalogs come out so I can decide which boards I’m going to try to ride (i.e. I don’t re-test a board that hasn’t changed), but when I look at the Catalogs from 19/20, 20/21 and 21/22 and currently on their website, the Asymulator is rated 6/10 from Capita in terms of flex. I personally felt it at a 5/10 flex. But I don’t think Capita has changed their ratings on it. Capita’s ratings are also based on their cores (or so I was told by someone from Capita) – and don’t take into account the additives and type of fibreglass used etc. But the glass doesn’t seemed to be changed or anything on the Aysmulator either. The only thing that seems to be different (based on the specs) is the alloy skid plates (which looks like they just lightened them up). But there could be something they changed that they didn’t publish. But as far as I’m aware they haven’t changed it.
But if they did beef it up a touch, then it would be similar to the Greats, in terms of flex, I would say.
When there are so many good choices, it’s definitely a high quality problem to have!
Jon says
Thanks for all you do!
will you be testing the 2022 force pros this year?
Would love to read your rating on it.
Nate says
Hi Jon
I will make an effort to get on the Force Pros this year. Typically I get stuff from Union anywhere between early Feb and late March. If they have the Force Pros available I’ll get on them for sure (will likely be the 22/23 model though) .
Mat says
Hi Nate! First of thanks for all the great reviews! I think your content is very valuable for the snowboarding community.
Regarding the Union bindings I have a burning question. Sadly I can’t find much info about how they fit size 13 boots. I have Burotn SLX boots in size 13 and I’m looking into buying the Atlas. Will they fit my boots or are my boots to big?
I currently own the Warpig (154) and the Twinpig (156W). I have Burton Genesis bindings for one board (currently mounted on the Twinpig) and looking into buying the Atlas for another (probably for the Warpig). I like my Genesis a lot except for the disks wich lack a bit of adjustability imo.
As a side note, would you rather recommend getting the Strata instead of Atlas? In that case I would put the Strata on my Twinpig and Genesis on the Warpig. Would the Strata also fit my 13 boots well?
Thank you so much for your answer and keep up the excellent work man!
Nate says
Hi Mat
Thanks for your message.
Can’t say for sure, because I’ve never had 13s in Large Union bindings, so I can’t guarantee anything. But given that you have Burton boots, which are pretty low profile, I would be surprised if Large Union couldn’t take Burton 13s.
I’ve ridden boots with a 31.3cm length in Union medium. I would predict your boots to be between 33.5cm and 33.8cm (I haven’t measured the SLX specifically, but I’ve measured a majority of their other boots, so it’s based on that). I would be surprised if their large couldn’t accommodate at least 2.5cm more in length. And in terms of footbed length you should be all good there. The Atlas L will likely have a longer footbed on it than the Genesis L. If you went Strata, you’d get an even longer base plate, but I think the Atlas will be just fine.
I would go Atlas on Warpig and Genesis on Twinpig, like you say. Even if you went Strata, I would still go Genesis on Twinpig and Strata on Warpig. To me the Strata are stiffer than the Genesis, and with the Warpig being the stiffer board, I think that would be the better match. The other way around would still work, but that’s the way I’d do it.
Hope this helps
Mat says
Hi Nate!
Oh it helps a lot and thank you so much for your reply!
Regarding Burton SLXs I actually measured them at 33.3cm (or borderline 33.4cm) so pretty reduced footprint imo. I contacted a local shop and they assured me Union bindigs fit size 13 boots well so you are right about it being fine. On the plus side I also ordered a new pair of Adidas Response in size 12.5 or 30.5 which is actually my true mondo. I’m really hoping they will fit me well and I will get an even more reduced footprint.
I agree with you and Genesis will stay on the Twinpig but I now have a new dilemma regarding Unions. I started leaning more and more towards the new Falcors for my Warpig. In my experience the Warpig (I own a 2021 model) is stiffer than marketed so I’m looking for a more responsive binding with better ollie/pop power. The mini disc and Falcor straps also appeal to me more. I like to do side hits, medium jumps, butters and I’m also liking my Warpig in pow. What’s your take on that? Would I be making a huge mistake by going with the falcors?
Thanks man!
Nate says
Hi Mat
I love the Falcor’s, so I think the only reason you wouldn’t is if the board was too soft for them. I probably wouldn’t put them on a board with less than 6/10 flex. So, if you feel the Warpig is at least 6/10 flex (I’ve had others say they feel it’s a bit more than medium too – I haven’t ridden it in too long, hoping to get back on it soon), then I think you could put the Falcor’s on there for sure. Note the 2022 model Falcor is a little stiffer than previous models (7.5/10 by my feel versus 7/10 previously).
Mat says
Hi Nate!
You have helped me a lot with your advice and I can honestly just say thank you. I ordered the Falcors and I’m sure I’ll love them to. By my feel the Warpig is right around a 7 flex or maybe a solid 6.5 at least. You should definitely review it again as they have made some changes from the old models. I also see a lot of riders putting Rides A-8 or C-8 bindings on it so I think the Falcors will be great also.
Appreciate your work a lot man! You do great things for the community. Take care!
Nate says
You’re very welcome Mat.
I even more want to get back on it now. I have a Twinpig coming my way right now, so hopefully I can get on both this winter. Happy riding!
Saeed says
Hi Nate,
Thank you for your comprehensive review, it helps a lot.
I’m an intermediate rider and just got a Jones Mountain Twin 157, I was wondering which binding among the Strata, Mercury, Meteorite, Falcor, and Atlas would be the best choice for all-mountain/freestyle riding?
Nate says
Hi Saeed
Thanks for your message.
I would be looking to pair it with the Strata for all-mountain/freestyle riding. It’s a really good flex match to the MT and they’ve got great board feel (something that I really appreciate for freestyle riding). The Falcor also has good board feel, but it’s a stiffer binding. Doable on the MT, but bordering on too stiff – and bordering on too stiff for intermediate too. The Mercury isn’t quite as stiff as the Falcor, but not too far off. And, in my experience the board feel isn’t great, IMO. Otherwise, it would match the MT. I haven’t tested the Meteorite yet, but flex-wise, it looks like it could be similar to the Strata, or a little softer. I think it’s a match to the MT, so an option, but again, the board feel is likely not to be as good as the Strata. The Mercury has amazing shock absorption and the Meteorite is likely no different. But the Strata also has decent shock absorption, so all round that’s what I’d be leaning towards.
Hope this helps with your decision
Jon says
Hey Nate I’m gonna be on a 155 capita mega mercury this year (I’m 5’8, 150lbs size 8 boot), I like laying trenches and bombing the mountain. Also like to get in tree runs and mess around on side hits/natural features, rarely in the park. Would the latest atlas or falcors work best for that board?
Thanks in advance!
Nate says
Hi Jon
Thanks for your message.
I would be leaning Falcor, just because it’s a little stiffer, by my feel (Union rates the Atlas quite a bit stiffer than what I felt it at). The Mega Merc is stiffer than Capita rate it (again, by my feel), so I’d want fairly stiff bindings on there to drive it. So yeah, I would go Falcor personally. I don’t think the Atlas are completely wrong for it or anything, but the Falcor a better match, IMO.
Hope this helps with your decision
Jon says
Sounds good, thank you! Also would a 157 mega merc for my weight and boot size feel very planky? Not sure if you’ve ridden it but I’m a little worried the 155 might not be stable enough to bomb. I do value maneuverability but not at the cost of stability at high speeds. Thanks again!
Oh and just yesterday published my review of the Mega Merc, if you wanted to check out more details on what I thought of it.
Nate says
Hi Jon
Yeah, IMO, the 157 would be too big and planky. The 155 should be well stable enough for your weight and boot size. The board is a beast and I think the 155 will be plenty stable enough – and a much better balance between stable at speeds and maneuverability than the 157. I think the 157 would be sacrificing too much maneuverability to get a little more stability.
Mike says
For all mountain riding with a bit of freestyle would you recommend the atlas or the falcor . Which binding would also be compatible with more boards if you wanted one binding to do it all and switch between boards ?
Nate says
Hi Mike
Thanks for your message.
I prefer the Falcor for freestyle, just because I like the feel of that mini-disc. I prefer having less deadspot underfoot for loading up ollies and for butters. Plus I really like the more explosive/springy response I get from the Falcor (versus a more even, smoother response from the Atlas). But it also really depends on the board your riding it on. The 2022 Falcor to me is around a 7.5/10 flex, versus 6.5/10 flex. Depending on the board the Falcor could be too stiff or the Atlas too soft. Note that the 2021 Falcor and prior were more like 7/10 flex (by my feel).
In terms of binding to switch between boards, it depends on a couple of factors. The flex range of the boards in your quiver. Like if you’ve got something that’s like 8/10 flex and something that’s 6/10 kind of thing, then I’d probably be leaning Falcor to cover those boards best. But if you’ve got like a 7/10 and a 5/10, then Atlas might be better. Also depends on the board in terms of compatibility. The Falcor uses a mini-disc and can’t be mounted on 4 x 4 insert patterns (whilst most boards are 2 x 4 these days, there are a few boards that have “slam back” or “blower stance” inserts, which is a set of holes that’s setback 4cm back from the main insert pack – mini-discs can’t be setup on those extra holes). The Atlas will go on those boards fine (fits 2 x 4, 4 x 4 and the channel, but Falcor 2 x 4 and the channel but not 4 x 4.)
Hope this helps
Alevio says
Hi Nate,
Thanks for your review, I have a Nitro Magnum and size 13, would you think the Union Atlas would be a good binding for me or would you advise another binding? I am an advanced rider, pretty much doing a bit of everything (more freeride than parks though),
Thanks a lot and keep up the good work,
Alevio
Nate says
Hi Alevio
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t ridden the Magnum, but based on specs and my experience with other Nitro boards, I think the Atlas would be a very good match for it. And for the style of riding you’re describing it definitely works too, IMO.
Hope this helps
Niko says
Hi Nate,
Do you know the baseplate length of size L Atlas. I made a purchase of Capita Kazu Kokubo 157+Union Atlas L. My foot is mondo 280cm, but my current boots are 285. I ride front foot +15deg and back foot -9deg. Will i have binding overhang?
So i am wondering whether I should’ve purchased size M bindings.
Great site, keep up the good work.
Nate says
Hi Niko
Thanks for your message.
I haven’t measured the baseplate on the L Atlas, just the M. But I would say you’re probably fine there – just based on the M and on the difference between M and L in other Union bindings. The bottom of the baseplate on the Atlas is 23cm. The bottom of the baseplate on the Force M is around 24.5cm. The bottom of the baseplate on the L Force is 26.3cm (from what I’ve been told by others, but I haven’t measured it myself). So my guess would be that the L Atlas would be around 24.8cm give or take. The footbed on the Atlas is longer and based on other sizes, the footbed is likely around 26.5cm.
The Kazu is around 26.2cm at the back insert, but with a 9 degree angle, I don’t think you would get any binding overhang. And if you do it would only be the footbed, which of course sits higher up, and only very very minimal and nothing that would be worried about. Of course no guarantees, but based on this I think you would be fine with the L Atlas on the 157 Kazu.
In terms of fitting into the M, depending on the brand/model of your boots you might be OK to fit in the M, but I think you will be fine with the L on that board anyway.
Hope this helps
Jake says
Hi Nate,
I just bought the 2021 Yes Standard (in large part thanks to your review) and I am looking for some new bindings to pair with it. I do a little bit of everything when I ride, from powder to park, which is why I wanted the versatility of the Standard. I am looking at both the Union Atlas and Falcor. Which of those two would you recommend for the Standard? I’m also open to suggestions if you think another binding might be better. Also, would there be any issue with the Falcor’s mini disc in using the Standard’s slamback inserts?
Thanks!
Nate says
Hi Jake
Thanks for your message.
Glad you mentioned the slam backs. Before I read that part, I was going to say go Atlas, because you won’t be able to use the slam backs with the mini disc on the Falcor. Also I think the Atlas is very subtly a better flex match to the Standard. Very little difference, IMO, but just subtly. And yeah, because you can use the Slam Backs with the Atlas, that’s the way I would be leaning for you, with the Standard.
Hope this helps
Jake says
Great thank you! Keep up the awesome work with these reviews, they really helped me out a lot.
Nate says
You’re very welcome Jake. Happy riding!
Paul says
Hi Nate
I have a Lib Tech Terrain Wrecker 2021 – 161W.
Which binding would you recommend me? The Atlas or the Strata? I ride more relaxed.
Nate says
Hi Paul
Thanks for your message.
Not really a wrong choice there, but I would be leaning towards Strata in this case. Just mildly softer and subtly a better match for the Terrain Wrecker.
Hope this helps
BEN SNOW says
Hi Nate, would the 2021 Atlas Kazu share all the upgrades? I noticed that the ankle strap is different from regular Atlas. In fact, it appears to be the same strap as the 2021 Strata. Thoughts? Thanks.
Nate says
Hi Ben
Thanks for your message. I hadn’t looked closely at the Kazu Atlas until you mentioned it there – but you’re right it does have a different strap, which is the same as the strap on the 2021 Strata (the Forma Lab ankle strap as opposed to the Exoframe 3.0 on the Atlas. Everything else looks to be the same as with the regular Atlas, but it gets that upgraded ankle strap.
Both straps are really nice, so there’s not going to be a huge difference there – however, I do slightly prefer the Forma Lab over the Exoframe 3.0 personally.
So yeah it shares all the upgrades that the regular Atlas got, in addition to one extra upgrade, by the looks of it.
Oh and I just noticed it’s also got a different toe strap to the regular Atlas. I don’t notice a massive difference between the Hexagrip and the TS-3.0 Ultragrip Wide, so not really a downgrade or upgrade there, IMO.
giannis sidiropoulos says
Hello I have bought a lib tech orca and I am between union falcor union atlas and burton cartel x .who would you suggest to me and why?
Nate says
Hi Giannis
Thanks for your message.
I would personally probably lean towards the Falcor, because I really like those bindings – but also because I think they’re a slightly better flex-match for the Orca and they’re a harder driving binding, and I think the Orca needs a hard driver. All would work, but I would be leaning Falcor. I haven’t ridden the Cartel X yet, but on paper they would be suitable too. I would likely still lean Falcor, just because they have a longer baseplate and the Orca is a wider board (just to gain a little more leverage on the edges). Not a deal breaker, but that would be one thing I would be considering for that board, depending on the size of bindings and the size Orca that you have.
Hope this helps
giannis sidiropoulos says
thanks nate you help me very much i found the ultra union 2020 with 60 %sale and i took it.
i believe its very similar with falcor.and i believe its a good choice.What is your opinion?
Nate says
Hi Giannis
I wouldn’t say the Falcor and Ultra are super similar. They’ve got a different feel. They have a similar flex to the baseplate, but a stiffer highback, and from my feel felt stiffer overall than the Falcor. That’s not necessarily a bad thing though on the Orca. I think it will match the Orca just fine. But will feel a little stiffer than the Falcor would have, IMO.
Jakub says
Hi
What Do u think Abou matching Jones Flagship 19 with Atlas 20 or 21? I am thinking about Falcor as well. Cant really decide which one to buy.cheers
Nate says
Hi Jakub
I would go Falcor over Atlas for the 2019 Flagship. Just that little bit more drive out of the Falcor, and the 2019 Flagship needs a hard driver, IMO. The Atlas would work, but I think the Falcor would be the slightly better option. The Atlas FC would be a really good match too, but I understand the price of the Atlas FC is pretty prohibitive to most.
Hope this helps
Kenny says
How do you think this would pair up with the new Capita Black Snowboard of death? Thinking about these or the new Rome D.O.D. bindings, but also open to other suggestions.
Nate says
Hi Kenny
I think the Atlas would work well on the BSOD. I don’t test Rome gear, so not sure about the D.O.D. In general, I would try to match the BSOD with anything around a 7/10 flex. The Atlas is close to that, and would work, IMO. And is a very good pair of bindings, IMO, outside of just looking at flex.
Check out the following if you wanted to look at other options:
>>Top 5 All-Mountain-Freeride Bindings
Hope this helps
Zee says
Hi Nate,
Thanks for the review. I’m a high-intermediate rider who likes all-mountain freeriding, tree-runs, powder, jumps on natural kickers.
I currently ride a 2018 Salomon Sight with Salomon District bindings and a 10.5 Salomon Hi-Fi (28.5 cm) boot. Both the board and bindings are quite soft and I’m considering making that combo into my park/freestyle board and using my 2020 Yes Pick Your Line (159) as my do-everything board.
For this I need to pick out a good pair of bindings and I’m trying to decide between the Union Falcor, Union Atlas, and Burton Cartel. Which do you recommend?
Nate says
Hi Zee
Thanks for your message.
For the PYL, I would be leaning towards the Falcors. I think they’re the best flex match and overall a very good pair of bindings. The Atlas and Cartel would certainly work with it, but, IMO, the Falcor would be the best choice of the 3.
Rob says
Been riding unions for years but really have been thinking of making the switch to Flux. Have you ridden the tm’s? You obviously like the XF’s, comparison?
Nate says
Hi Rob
Thanks for your message.
I have ridden the TMs – and they’re also very good bindings. Flux are pretty consistently good across their line I have found, from the models I have tried. I slightly prefer the XF over the TM, but mostly because of personal preference I think. I found the XFs were just that little bit more forgiving, and with slightly better board feel – partly because they’re slightly softer flexing and partly because they have slightly shorter high backs. But forgiveness is a personal preference thing. I found the XFs struck a really good balance (for me) in terms of being responsive but still with enough forgiveness.
But for more details, check out the following:
>>Flux TM Full Review
>>Flex XF Full Review
Hope this helps with your decision
Rafael says
Hi Nate,
Thanks for your reviews. The breadth of your coverage really helps me make informed decisions. Please keep up the great work.
Question. I urgently need to replace my Union Atlas for an upcoming trip. I’m riding a Jones Ultra Mountain Twin and am considering my binding options. I’ve never been a park rat, but have enjoyed hitting natural features all around.
In an ideal world, I’d be hitting back country pow day in day out. Given weather conditions, the reality is that towards the end of last season, I’ve enjoyed bombing/ carving a lot more technically on groomers and have enjoyed dialling all my gear super tight and responsive. How would the Flux XF compare to the Atlas? Should I go for a Union Falcor or Flux XV if I want an even faster response?
Nate says
Hi Rafael
Thanks for your message.
I would personally prefer the XF or Falcor on the Ultra Mountain Twin than the Atlas. Just a little bit more responsive, and better in terms of board feel, IMO. But if you really want dialled-in, stiff and responsive, then something like the XV would be the way to go.
Something like one of these would be good options in that case (which includes the XV):
>>Top 5 Freeride Bindings
If you want just that little bit more forgiveness but still great response, then I would say the XF or Falcor are the best bets.
Hope this helps